Jump to content

Iraq and it's Al-Queda problem


GostHacked

Recommended Posts

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-25588615

So when do we go help Iraq... again?

Sunni militants linked to al-Qaeda are reportedly still in control of parts of two cities in western Iraq.

Fierce fighting continues as government troops try to force militants aligned to the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIS) from Ramadi and Fallujah.

A leader of a tribal militia fighting alongside government forces says that more than 60 jihadists have been killed in or near Ramadi.

Clashes erupted on Monday after troops dismantled a protest camp in the city.

Local Sunni Arabs had been demonstrating for months against what they perceive as discrimination by the Shia-led government and unfair targeting of their minority community by anti-terrorism measures implemented to stem the surge in sectarian violence.

But Prime Minister Nouri Maliki ordered that the sit-in be cleared, alleging it had "turned into a headquarters for the leadership of al-Qaeda".

I think they could use some more freedom.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 395
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I was listening to a program last night, and the topic was Africa, and how the violence there is about,..guess what... OIL. The US, Al Queda, the leaders of the African countries that have the oil, the word is, it's getting nasty fight to get the oil, so Africa will be the lead country for wars in 2014.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was listening to a program last night, and the topic was Africa, and how the violence there is about,..guess what... OIL. The US, Al Queda, the leaders of the African countries that have the oil, the word is, it's getting nasty fight to get the oil, so Africa will be the lead country for wars in 2014.

That has been already been going on for decades.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it were only as simple as that. You like history right?

Post 911 western politics, and a group of incompetent gerbil faced optimists brought the war to Iraq. Never let a good crisis go to waste as they say! And we will be out of there within a few months and it will cost a few million dollars!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Post 911 western politics, and a group of incompetent gerbil faced optimists brought the war to Iraq. Never let a good crisis go to waste as they say! And we will be out of there within a few months and it will cost a few million dollars!

Either way, Saddam had to go. But, like Vietnamization...handing the war over to the Iraqi army will simply not work. Fallujah fell to al-Qaeda this weekend, for example. They had better start droning some rear-ends or it will be helicopters from the roofs of the Green Zone before long.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Post 911 western politics, and a group of incompetent gerbil faced optimists brought the war to Iraq. Never let a good crisis go to waste as they say! And we will be out of there within a few months and it will cost a few million dollars!

One main reason was to get Al-Queda out of Iraq and Afghanistan. Let's just call that a fail. They never left. And now they are causing a lot of trouble. In fact I'd say the US helped Al-Queda by taking out hardliners like Saddam. But, some would interpret that as me supporting terrorism.

But Kerry says:

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/01/05/kerry-vows-support-for-iraq-government-in-fallujah-but-wont-send-us-troops/

In his first remarks since Islamic militants with Al Qaeda ties overran the Iraqi cities of Fallujah and Ramadi, U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry promised support for Iraq's government, but emphatically rejected any possibility that the U.S. would send troops back into the country, saying of the Baghdad government "this is their fight."

Men like Saddam would have taken care of this issue. Why not just use drones like the US is doing elsewhere.

This was expected to happen. Take out Saddam, disband the military, try a new government, it has issues, cannot maintain security (see disbanding of army and police) and now has another Al-Queda problem.

Al-Queda are the ones our governments say are the bad guys right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We've seen weekly bombings in Iraq and last year apparently was the highest death toll since 'Mission Accomplished' Iraq is another hot bed for these terrorist types.

Kerry is showing how much of a (fill in the blank) he really is. I think he needs another swiftboat kick in the ass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One main reason was to get Al-Queda out of Iraq and Afghanistan. Let's just call that a fail. They never left. And now they are causing a lot of trouble. In fact I'd say the US helped Al-Queda by taking out hardliners like Saddam. But, some would interpret that as me supporting terrorism.

But Kerry says:

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/01/05/kerry-vows-support-for-iraq-government-in-fallujah-but-wont-send-us-troops/

Men like Saddam would have taken care of this issue. Why not just use drones like the US is doing elsewhere.

This was expected to happen. Take out Saddam, disband the military, try a new government, it has issues, cannot maintain security (see disbanding of army and police) and now has another Al-Queda problem.

Al-Queda are the ones our governments say are the bad guys right?

Helicopters from the Green Zone...lol. Not so far...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No. The quaint coalition of mouth-breathing morons of course didn't give a rat's ass about the Iraqis...and it shows.

What's interesting is that a great part of the objection to the war, from the start, was of the probabilities of terrible, unintended consequences...like, oh, for example, sectarian bloodshed....which occurred; the rise of terrorist violence.....well, lookee there; and the eventual threat of extremist Islamists taking advantage of the chaos to insert themselves into (at least) regional powers...

....and of course, as we all remember well, the little geniuses who supported and defended the war derided all these warnings as wildly implausible......

Well, I take no pleasure form the incompetence of the war's architects, nor from the monumental servility of the their defenders. It's been one sad tragedy after another. Good job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,723
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    DACHSHUND
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • babetteteets went up a rank
      Rookie
    • paradox34 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • paradox34 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • phoenyx75 earned a badge
      First Post
    • paradox34 earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...