I miss Reagan Posted February 15, 2005 Report Posted February 15, 2005 Not when I have you around to repeat lies like "Fox News was banned!" It was banned. You're being obtuse again. No. Banned means "To prohibit, especially by official decree". If you'd read over the thread instead of barking like a trained seal, you'd see that was not the case. Fox was never banned and it was also never denied a start up license. The CRTC gave approval for "Fox News Canada" but Fox News chose not to work with Global TV to offer that service. Fox was banned. Quote "Liberals saw the savagery of the 9/11 attacks and wanted to offer therapy and understanding for our attackers. Conservatives saw the savagery of 9/11 and the attacks and prepared for war." -Karl Rove
Newfie Canadian Posted February 15, 2005 Report Posted February 15, 2005 FoxNews wasn't banned from coming to Canada, it was just refused a broadcasting licence, until late last year. The CRTC never reviewed a ban, it reviewed and granted an application to broadcast. Quote "If you don't believe your country should come before yourself, you can better serve your country by livin' someplace else." Stompin' Tom Connors
I miss Reagan Posted February 15, 2005 Report Posted February 15, 2005 Okaying Al-Jazeera coming into Canada, but forbidding Fox News, tells you all you need to know about the CRTC. Does that make sense? Of course not, but that's the CRTC -- Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission -- which has about as much relevance to today's electronic society as the horse and buggy has to the automobile. Fox was rejected last year as part of an application that included other U.S.specialty channels like ESPN and HBO, and refused for three years to enter the country on a licence requiring some Canadian content. This debate is pointless. The statement that the CRTC "approves" Fox News, in itself implys that it was banned. Conduct a simple search on any search engine. This is insane. Quote "Liberals saw the savagery of the 9/11 attacks and wanted to offer therapy and understanding for our attackers. Conservatives saw the savagery of 9/11 and the attacks and prepared for war." -Karl Rove
Black Dog Posted February 15, 2005 Report Posted February 15, 2005 It was not "banned". See, the way it works is, cable and/or satellite companies that wish to carry foreign signals here must apply to do so. A prior application for by the Canadian Cable Telecommunications Association to bring Fox to Canada was rejected because Fox News U.S. and Winnipeg-based Global Television were already planning to create Fox News Canada, a digital hybrid of U.S. and Canadian news. Those plans were scrubbed by Fox U.S.A. and so the next application for FoxNews was approved. No ban. No socialist conspiracy. Just a lot of right-wing disinformation and hot air. The statement that the CRTC "approves" Fox News, in itself implys that it was banned. Conduct a simple search on any search engine. This is insane. The same decision which saw FoxNews get approved also gave the go-ahead to the NFL Network. Tell me: was the 24 hour football network also banned? Quote
Montgomery Burns Posted February 16, 2005 Author Report Posted February 16, 2005 Hey Burns...Where can we get a CBC or a C-BS Blocker? Oh wait... you say that no one has ever made one? Oh my... I wonder why not? Perhaps because they are the one who are actually Fair and Balanced? I doubt you will find them. Conservatives wouldn't block another news channel; that's the left's game. Who could ever forget the left chanting in Manhatten (outside the FNC's station) during the RNC...F*CK FOX NEWS? You could just feel the tolerance and understanding excuding from the left. Oh and yes, CBC is so fair and balanced; that's why the 5th Estate had to pay a lawsuit for their lies, and C-BS had its "fake but accurate" phony memos before the US election this year. Quote "Anybody who doesn't appreciate what America has done, and President Bush, let them go to hell!" -- Iraqi Betty Dawisha, after dropping her vote in the ballot box, wields The Cluebat™ to the anti-liberty crowd on Dec 13, 2005. "Call me crazy, but I think they [iraqis] were happy with thier [sic] dumpy homes before the USA levelled so many of them" -- Gerryhatrick, Feb 3, 2006.
Montgomery Burns Posted February 16, 2005 Author Report Posted February 16, 2005 An excellent article yesterday from Paul Jackson about the Fox News Channel being banned from Canada. As we all know, the Liberal Party-controlled CRTC would only allow something called "Fox News Canada"...whatever the hell that is. Quote: Yes, friends, through Starchoice I've become a devotee of Fox News, (www.foxnews.com) the most popular all-news TV network in the U.S., and the one the Liberal-dominated Canadian Radio-telecommunications and Television Commission (CRTC) tried to prevent Canadians from watching. Why? Because it openly gives a voice to conservative commentators rather than the Lib-Left establishment. And, naturally, the thought-control police of the Jean Chretien/Paul Martin regimes can't tolerate anything that doesn't walk the official Lib-Left line. Think of 1984's George Orwell and his perceptive warning: "I believe totalitarian ideas have taken root in the minds of pseudo-intellectuals everywhere." Whatever, for years Canadians were forbidden to watch Fox News -- Big Brother saw to that -- but the CRTC made one huge error. It gave the green light to the Islamic terrorists' favourite network, al-Jazeera, to pipe its anti-America drivel into Canadian minds, and with that, the charade that there wasn't enough room for another all-news channel fell through. Fox News' slogan, echoed by all, but I like it especially when quoted by the gorgeous newscaster Page Hopkins, is: "Only one network has Real Journalism. Fair and Balanced. That's why we're Number One." End quote Quote "Anybody who doesn't appreciate what America has done, and President Bush, let them go to hell!" -- Iraqi Betty Dawisha, after dropping her vote in the ballot box, wields The Cluebat™ to the anti-liberty crowd on Dec 13, 2005. "Call me crazy, but I think they [iraqis] were happy with thier [sic] dumpy homes before the USA levelled so many of them" -- Gerryhatrick, Feb 3, 2006.
Black Dog Posted February 16, 2005 Report Posted February 16, 2005 An excellent article yesterday from Paul Jackson about the Fox News Channel being banned from Canada. As we all know, the Liberal Party-controlled CRTC would only allow something called "Fox News Canada"...whatever the hell that is. Two factual errors here: Error #1 "the Liberal Party-controlled CRTC would only allow something called "Fox News Canada"..." Fox News Canada was a creation of Fox News U.S. and Global Television. Thei rplans to launch this were what kille dthe original CCTA appilcation. Error #2: "An excellent article yesterday from Paul Jackson" There is, in fact, no such thing as an excellent article from Paul Jackson. Who could ever forget the left chanting in Manhatten (outside the FNC's station) during the RNC...F*CK FOX NEWS? You could just feel the tolerance and understanding excuding from the left. So wait: we leftists are suppossed to tolerate intolerance now? I don't think that's how this works. Quote
Fortunata Posted February 16, 2005 Report Posted February 16, 2005 Fox News, Schmox News. It's good entertainment but bad news. They could get their facts straight if they tried tho. I just don't think they want to. They'd rather smear and fear mong. It can get as good as the comedy channel. Oh, and people think Fox was banned cause O'Reilly TOLD THEM SO. Good little sheeples. Quote
Montgomery Burns Posted February 21, 2005 Author Report Posted February 21, 2005 FACT: The CRTC refused to let the pure unadulterated Fox News Channel into Canada for years. They put special restrictions on Fox by demanding that they change their programming and have 35% Canadian content; They said it would be called "Fox News Canada." CNN had no such restrictions placed on it. The far left Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting did a study and concluded that 57% of guests on Brit Hume’s show, Special Report, were conservative. Cry me a ****** river. Fox leans right, but so what? CNN, NBC, CBC, and the majors are so tilted left that Fox is a refreshing alternative. May they continue to prosper. Liberals either have a weak ideology (check), or they are not used to defending their platform (check) by reporters or pundits on TV. Liberals often end up looking dumb on the FNC. They are not used to having to defend their twisted ideology against conservative pundits on live TV. And that's why people like Black Dog defend the childish antics of the radical leftists who were chanting "F*** Fox News" in Manhatten during the RNC and, as stated in the article, wanted Fox News off the air. Liberals fear that Fox News is hurting their relentless brainwashing of the population. Quote "Anybody who doesn't appreciate what America has done, and President Bush, let them go to hell!" -- Iraqi Betty Dawisha, after dropping her vote in the ballot box, wields The Cluebat™ to the anti-liberty crowd on Dec 13, 2005. "Call me crazy, but I think they [iraqis] were happy with thier [sic] dumpy homes before the USA levelled so many of them" -- Gerryhatrick, Feb 3, 2006.
Guest eureka Posted February 22, 2005 Report Posted February 22, 2005 Since you have not heard of much else, I suspect that you have not heard the recently broken news that the administration has been paying" Conservative" reporters and columnists for their support - including commentators on Fox. And that it has put pressure on Fox and others to not have non-radical rightists appear. There is also the very recent one about the non-accredited "journalist" who walks in and out of White House briefings and gets Bush's requests for soft questions. He also has made reports, on behalf of the White House on the danger of "gays." The interesting bit about that is that he is a reporter for a "gay" paper and runs a "gay" lifestyle website. Quote
Black Dog Posted February 22, 2005 Report Posted February 22, 2005 The CRTC refused to let the pure unadulterated Fox News Channel into Canada for years. They put special restrictions on Fox by demanding that they change their programming and have 35% Canadian content; They said it would be called "Fox News Canada." Pure, unadulterated rubbish. "FoxNews Canada" was Global's baby. The CRTC approved FOX News Canada on behalf of the Global Television Network for broadcast. The CRTC even went so far as to grant Global and Fox an extension on negotiations. The channel was never implemented by FOX, and the deadline for commencement of the service expired on November 24, 2004. The far left Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting did a study and concluded that 57% of guests on Brit Hume’s show, Special Report, were conservative. 71 per cent to be exact. Liberals often end up looking dumb on the FNC. They are not used to having to defend their twisted ideology against conservative pundits on live TV. Or could it be that Fox goes out of its way to make liberals look dumb (like their house "liberal", the ineffectual Alan Colmes). Debate is non-existent on Fox News, much like truth is non-existent in your posts. Liberals fear that Fox News is hurting their relentless brainwashing of the population. And the unintentional irony award goes to.... Monty! Fox News and misperceptions In the run-up to the war with Iraq and in the postwar period, a significant portion of the American public has held a number of misperceptions that have played a key role in generating and maintaining approval for the decision to go to war. Significant portions of the public have believed that Iraq was directly involved in the September 11 attacks and that evidence of links between Iraq and al-Qaeda have been found, that weapons of mass destruction were found in Iraq after the war and that Iraq actually used weapons of mass destruction during the war, and that world public opinion has approved of the US going to war with Iraq. While, in most cases only a minority has any particular misper-ception, a large majority has at least one key misperception.... Fox News watchers were most likely to hold misperceptions—and were more than twice as likely than the next nearest network to hold all three misperceptions. Who's doing the brainwashing, again? Quote
Guest eureka Posted February 23, 2005 Report Posted February 23, 2005 "And the unintentional irony award goes to Monty." I had missed the award winning statement, BD. Quote
anticlimates Posted February 23, 2005 Report Posted February 23, 2005 This topic is moronic. Why would Canada or anyone in Canada - Liberal or otherwise - be afraid of FOX? Pure trolling bullshit. By an American, I'm guessing! Quote
Black Dog Posted February 23, 2005 Report Posted February 23, 2005 "And the unintentional irony award goes to Monty." I had missed the award winning statement, BD. Liberals fear that Fox News is hurting their relentless brainwashing of the population. Methinks Burnsy is projecting. Quote
ft.niagara Posted February 28, 2005 Report Posted February 28, 2005 This topic is moronic. Why would Canada or anyone in Canada - Liberal or otherwise - be afraid of FOX?Pure trolling bullshit. By an American, I'm guessing! Why indeed! This thread was started back in September. It seems to be the longest running active thread. Fox News IS the most influential news service in the US, bar none. Obviously, people can not tune in. What's the problem? CNN has really two channels. Obvious solution, remove one of CNN's channels: Headline News. To be truly informed about what your neighbor to the south is thinking, an enlightened person would want at to least have access to Fox News. Quote
anticlimates Posted February 28, 2005 Report Posted February 28, 2005 Why indeed! This thread was started back in September. It seems to be the longest running active thread. Fox News IS the most influential news service in the US, bar none. Obviously, people can not tune in. What's the problem? CNN has really two channels. Obvious solution, remove one of CNN's channels: Headline News.To be truly informed about what your neighbor to the south is thinking, an enlightened person would want at to least have access to Fox News. Well, seeing that it hasn't been touched for a few days, perhaps people like you are the reason it's the "longest running active thread"? Your point makes no sense though. "Why ideed"? Why indeed what? Quote
Montgomery Burns Posted March 4, 2005 Author Report Posted March 4, 2005 "FoxNews Canada" was Global's baby. The CRTC approved FOX News Canada on behalf of the Global Television Network for broadcast. The CRTC even went so far as to grant Global and Fox an extension on negotiations. The channel was never implemented by FOX, and the deadline for commencement of the service expired on November 24, 2004. Pure crap. It was the CRTC's practice at the time (and still is - witness Court TV Canada), as digital TV was coming into its own in Canada, that American stations would be allowed in some cases if the Canadian cable provider spiked it with Canadian flavor. CNN was immune to this practice. Thus we have no MTV here but rather an "MTV-Canada", and no BBC but "BBC-Canada", and so on. They're really Canadian rip offs of foreign broadcasts and stuffed with the usual state-mandated Canadian content which the CRTC enforces upon Canadian broadcasters in TV and radio. The 2000 application for Fox News Canada was approved but not acted upon, because the cable providers realized that that wasn't what Canadians had in mind when they asked for it. They wanted a pure, plain and simple (unadulterated) Fox News channel. Just like the grownups in the US can watch if they want to. 71 per cent to be exact Nope. 57 percent. I wonder if the precentage of conservatives on CBC would even hit double digits. I doubt it. Or could it be that Fox goes out of its way to make liberals look dumb (like their house "liberal", the ineffectual Alan Colmes). Debate is non-existent on Fox News, much like truth is non-existent in your posts. Freud had a term for some of the things you write. He called it projection. Do you know what projection is? Either that or you have never watched Fox News. Fox News has fierce compelling debates and is a breath of fresh air. One of the reasons why liberals loathe Fox News is because their side has to explain and account for their idiotic views and end up looking foolish - like Black Dog on this forum. Let's not forget that those who got their news from liberal sources believed that Saddam never had WMD, never sponsored terrorism, never aided Al Qaeda for 9-11. Indeed, most thought that criminal organizations like the UN and countries who were in bed with Saddam (France, Germany, Russia, and Canada) were against the liberation of Iraq for purely moral reasons. some even thought that Iraq was a Garden of Eden under Saddam's rule (Michael Moore-on's Fahrenheit 9-11). Can you spell brainwashing? And Black Dog is going to love today's ratings report: CNN tanking as Fox News surges The ratings are in for February, and the numbers are not good for CNN which saw steep losses in its viewership, while the Fox News Channel continued its rise. According to Nielsen Media Research, CNN's ratings fell by 21 percent last month in primetime, and 16 percent overall, reports Variety. Primetime big-name shows such as "Larry King Live," "Wolf Blitzer Reports," "Lou Dobbs Tonight," "Paula Zahn Now" and "Newsnight With Aaron Brown" all experienced double-digit declines. In contrast, Fox News was the only news network on cable to see viewership increases in February, as it outpaced all other cable news companies combined for the sixth straight month. "FNC averaged 1.57 million viewers in primetime, up 18 percent from the same period last year, while CNN fell 21 percent to 637,000 viewers from the same time period," Variety stated. Bwahahahahaha. No wonder the CBC went apesh*t when the CRTC was basically forced (after approving the anti-American and anti-semitic Al Jazeera to broadcast in Canada) to lift its ban of the FNC. Quote "Anybody who doesn't appreciate what America has done, and President Bush, let them go to hell!" -- Iraqi Betty Dawisha, after dropping her vote in the ballot box, wields The Cluebat™ to the anti-liberty crowd on Dec 13, 2005. "Call me crazy, but I think they [iraqis] were happy with thier [sic] dumpy homes before the USA levelled so many of them" -- Gerryhatrick, Feb 3, 2006.
Montgomery Burns Posted March 4, 2005 Author Report Posted March 4, 2005 This topic is moronic. Why would Canada or anyone in Canada - Liberal or otherwise - be afraid of FOX? I don't know. Why is the left so terrified of the FNC? Perhaps a Canadian moonbat can enlighten us. Are you up to the task? Perhaps you can volunteer to go on The O'Reilly Factor, or maybe face Sean Hannity and tell them...since many liberals are too gutless to go on Fox and back up their illogical views. I guess they are expecting to have Dan "fake but accurate memos" Rather fawn all over them... Quote "Anybody who doesn't appreciate what America has done, and President Bush, let them go to hell!" -- Iraqi Betty Dawisha, after dropping her vote in the ballot box, wields The Cluebat™ to the anti-liberty crowd on Dec 13, 2005. "Call me crazy, but I think they [iraqis] were happy with thier [sic] dumpy homes before the USA levelled so many of them" -- Gerryhatrick, Feb 3, 2006.
Guest eureka Posted March 4, 2005 Report Posted March 4, 2005 Could you tell me how to get an invitation to Fox. It might be an amusing experience to face off with the intellectual pygmies who pass for newscasters there. Quote
Montgomery Burns Posted March 4, 2005 Author Report Posted March 4, 2005 Fox News IS the most influential news service in the US, bar none. Obviously, people can not tune in. What's the problem? CNN has really two channels. Obvious solution, remove one of CNN's channels: Headline News. The FNC is available in Canada now. Its 5 year ban by the CRTC was lifted in November 2004. I get it on digital cable - you have to buy a digital box. I highly recommend getting the FNC. It is like no other news channel I have ever seen. It's easy to see why it gets better ratings than CNN, CNN Headline News, MSNBC, and CNBC combined. It's fast-paced, has cool graphics, and its opinion shows have fierce debate between both sides who passionately believe that their point of view is correct. When reporting the news, they call the terrorists "insurgents", but the pundits call them for what they really are - terrorists! One guy I work with is involved with the Liberal Party and even he said that he enjoyed watching Fox News, although he gets distressed at how bad liberal pundits often end up looking when faced with a conservative pundit. (I think years and years of softball questions by the liberal media has left them unprepared to back up their points). Their primetime lineup is excellent. Brit Hume's Special Report (leans to the right), followed by The O'Reilly Factor (O'Reilly calls himself a traditionalist, so he leans to the right, although he gets flack from conservatives also), followed by Hannity & Colmes - my favorite (one conservative pundit and one liberal pundit), followed by On The Record with the liberal Greta Von Sustern (sp?). You might remember her from the OJ trial on CNN. I also enjoy Neil Cavuto's show and John Gibson's show. They also have a half hour show on the weekend strictly devoted to media bias. I especially like when they read emails from viewers. many of them are insultive of Fox but they still get on the air. My favorite was when some leftwing idiotarian called The O'Reilly Factor...The Fascist Factor. I just about fell out of my chair from laughing so hard. The left's favorite insult; fascist...even though Mussolini and Hitler were both socialists, i.e, leftists. Although Fox leans right, there are no shortage of liberals on the channel. I especially enjoy that they expose these loonies that have hijacked the Democrat Party and crush them in debates using nothing but cold hard facts. One thing I noticed that drives liberals insane with rage is when Fox shows some event that is live, they have the little "live" graphic in the top LH corner and it interchanges with a small American flag waving like in a breeze. Patriotism! Nothing drives the left more crazy than patriotism for the country that is capitalistic, wildly successful, and destroyed their utopia (the USSR). As we all know, leftists hate America with a passion. That is why the American public doesn't trust them with national security. To be truly informed about what your neighbor to the south is thinking, an enlightened person would want at to least have access to Fox News. Well said. However we are talking about the left and they do not want any views out there that contradict theirs. The left has always been about totalitarianism. One can see it when they aligned themselves with Islamofascism to get their revenge on the US destroying their beloved USSR. Quote "Anybody who doesn't appreciate what America has done, and President Bush, let them go to hell!" -- Iraqi Betty Dawisha, after dropping her vote in the ballot box, wields The Cluebat™ to the anti-liberty crowd on Dec 13, 2005. "Call me crazy, but I think they [iraqis] were happy with thier [sic] dumpy homes before the USA levelled so many of them" -- Gerryhatrick, Feb 3, 2006.
Montgomery Burns Posted March 4, 2005 Author Report Posted March 4, 2005 CNN aka the Communist News Network allowed two of their liberal pundits (James Carville and Paul Begala) to continue to host their show (Crossfire) while both were advising the Kerry campaign - a blatant conflict of interest. The liberal media was utterly silent about this. Just think of the outrage there would have been had two conservative Fox News pundits done the same thing... CNN overlooked Saddam's atrocities (as admitted by Eason Jordan) so they could keep their Baghdad bureau open. Eason Jordan resigned because he got caught by a blogger at the Davos Forum ridiculously claiming that the US military was targeting journalists for death and had captured and tortured journalists. He tried to backtrack after getting caught (sucking up to the international community), but he couldn't take the heat and resigned. Never trust the left, with the exception of Lieberman and Zell Milller, etc, because they always take the side of the enemy...which is why the American public is reluctant to put them in charge of defending their country. Ann Coulter calls it treason and I have to agree with her...although I think that Canada's Rachel Marsden is better (and hotter) than Ann Coulter. Quote "Anybody who doesn't appreciate what America has done, and President Bush, let them go to hell!" -- Iraqi Betty Dawisha, after dropping her vote in the ballot box, wields The Cluebat™ to the anti-liberty crowd on Dec 13, 2005. "Call me crazy, but I think they [iraqis] were happy with thier [sic] dumpy homes before the USA levelled so many of them" -- Gerryhatrick, Feb 3, 2006.
Shakeyhands Posted March 4, 2005 Report Posted March 4, 2005 Monty... you sure are nuts. How about trying some decaf? Quote "They muddy the water, to make it seem deep." - Friedrich Nietzsche
Black Dog Posted March 4, 2005 Report Posted March 4, 2005 Pure crap. It was the CRTC's practice at the time (and still is - witness Court TV Canada), as digital TV was coming into its own in Canada, that American stations would be allowed in some cases if the Canadian cable provider spiked it with Canadian flavor. CNN was immune to this practice. Thus we have no MTV here but rather an "MTV-Canada", and no BBC but "BBC-Canada", and so on. They're really Canadian rip offs of foreign broadcasts and stuffed with the usual state-mandated Canadian content which the CRTC enforces upon Canadian broadcasters in TV and radio. CNN is not a digital cable channel. Nope. 57 percent. I wonder if the precentage of conservatives on CBC would even hit double digits. I doubt it. Fifty-seven percent of Special Report ’s one-on-one guests during the period studied were ideological conservatives, 12 percent were centrists and 11 percent were progressives. Twenty percent of guests were non-ideological. Among ideological guests, conservatives accounted for 72 percent, while centrists made up 15 percent and progressives 14 percent. (The total exceeds 100 percent due to rounding.) Viewers were roughly five times more likely to see a conservative interviewed on Special Report than a progressive. Freud had a term for some of the things you write. He called it projection. Do you know what projection is? Boy, you can't even come up with an original joke. Black Dog Posted on Feb 23 2005, 08:55 AM-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Methinks Burnsy is projecting. One of the reasons why liberals loathe Fox News is because their side has to explain and account for their idiotic views and end up looking foolish - like Black Dog on this forum. One of eh reasopns conservatives love Fox news is that it gives them a forum for this kind of self-congrulatory back-slapping (I'll spare you the cruder, yet more accurate, analogy). Let's not forget that those who got their news from liberal sources believed that Saddam never had WMD, never sponsored terrorism, never aided Al Qaeda for 9-11. U.S. "all wrong" on WMD: report No Evidence Connecting Iraq to Al Qaeda, 9/11 Panel Says FoxBoy is one for three. And Black Dog is going to love today's ratings report: CNN tanking as Fox News surges Unlike you, I don't associate popularity with quality. But then, I bet you dig Amerian Idol too. No wonder the CBC went apesh*t when the CRTC was basically forced (after approving the anti-American and anti-semitic Al Jazeera to broadcast in Canada) to lift its ban of the FNC One Fifth Estate program is hardly apeshit (you must be getting confused, what will all the simian feces being flung around by the likes of Nannity and O'Reilly). Yes means no for Al Jazeera Elie Kawkabani, president of Reach Media, a Los Angeles-based media marketing and distribution company, which holds the rights to distribute al-Jazeera, said the channel has been marketed in the United States since 1998 with no such restrictions. "A big percentage of Arab-Americans pay for the channel," he said. "The State Department has it, the White House has it." Kawkabani said that the Canadian restrictions pose impossible hurdles for distribution in Canada and that his company and cable firms plan to appeal the decision. "They've given us approval but made it difficult for cable companies and satellite companies to carry it. They are not set up to monitor and decide what is appropriate or not appropriate. Their role is not censorship," Kawkabani said. "They should not be concerned or involved in the content they deliver. The CRTC has made it impossible for us to find distribution in Canada." Well said. However we are talking about the left and they do not want any views out there that contradict theirs. The left has always been about totalitarianism. One can see it when they aligned themselves with Islamofascism to get their revenge on the US destroying their beloved USSR. Goodnight, folks! Quote
Montgomery Burns Posted March 5, 2005 Author Report Posted March 5, 2005 Shakeyhands, coming from you, I consider that a compliment. P.S. don't bogart the bong. Black Dog is jonesing. Quote "Anybody who doesn't appreciate what America has done, and President Bush, let them go to hell!" -- Iraqi Betty Dawisha, after dropping her vote in the ballot box, wields The Cluebat™ to the anti-liberty crowd on Dec 13, 2005. "Call me crazy, but I think they [iraqis] were happy with thier [sic] dumpy homes before the USA levelled so many of them" -- Gerryhatrick, Feb 3, 2006.
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.