Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Go to Google, type in "global warming and sea level rise" you'll be days reading all the evidence that will show up. Read a bit of it and then get back to me.

Why is there no plan in place to reduce that problem? We do not see a plan to relocate people from cities close to the oceans that are at sea level.

  • Replies 605
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

-We can conserve energy

-We can switch electrical generation from coal to nuclear/hydro/gas and then use more electric vehicles

-We can use more geothermal for heating

gas transition happens without any CO2 concerns so CO2 policies are irrelevant. same with energy conservation. nukes on a large scale can reduce emissions but that is not going to happen anytime soon.
Posted

gas transition happens without any CO2 concerns so CO2 policies are irrelevant. same with energy conservation. nukes on a large scale can reduce emissions but that is not going to happen anytime soon.

The point is that we have choices.

Even if we are doing some already, we can choose to do these things bigger, better and faster.

I am in favour of a well-implemented carbon-tax - this would incentivize the choices. Revenue raised in the carbon tax should be used to reduce the payroll tax and personal income taxes.

Posted

A carbon tax would be the most efficient way to reduce carbon pollution while reducing the potential for corruption.

"Our lives begin to end the day we stay silent about the things that matter." - Martin Luther King Jr
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities" - Voltaire

Posted

A carbon tax would be the most efficient way to reduce carbon pollution while reducing the potential for corruption.

Except we already have a large carbon tax on gasoline yet we still use gasoline.

Carbon taxes don't reduce emissions. They may slow the growth but that is it.

Posted

Carbon taxes don't reduce emissions. They may slow the growth but that is it.

oh, really? As one countering example: Carbon pricing most cost-effective way to reduce carbon emissions, says OECD --- Study finds cost of alternatives such as feed-in tariffs, industry regulation and subsidies can be ‘substantially higher’

Carbon taxes and emissions trading systems are the most cost-effective way to reduce emissions and should be “at the centre of government efforts to tackle climate change”, according to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

An OECD study, called Effective Carbon Prices, found that other policies, such as feed-in tariffs, industry regulation and subsidies, are far less economically preferable than carbon pricing.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,891
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    armchairscholar
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...