GostHacked Posted February 14, 2013 Report Posted February 14, 2013 Looks like we have another one. http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/saskatchewan/story/2013/02/13/sk-political-scientist-questions-pamela-wallin-senate-eligibility-1302.html Senator Pamela Wallin insists her home is Saskatchewan, in response to questions about whether she meets the residency requirements to sit in the Senate. "The question of home is pretty clear to me," Wallin said from Ottawa Wednesday when asked where she lives. "Saskatchewan is my home. I have lived and worked and continue to work not only in Ottawa but around this country." Senators are required to be residents of the province they represent, but according to Howard Leeson, political science professor emeritus at the University of Regina, since she was appointed in 2009, Wallin has given less than satisfactory answers to questions about her connection to the province. Quote
g_bambino Posted February 14, 2013 Report Posted February 14, 2013 (edited) We don't know that they are fraudulent yet. Duffy is required to own property in the province he represents and he sure can't be in two places at once. He is constitutionally required to reside in the province for which he is appointed. Of course, what "residence" means isn't exactly clear. [ed.: sp.] Edited February 14, 2013 by g_bambino Quote
g_bambino Posted February 14, 2013 Report Posted February 14, 2013 The system of Canadian Senators who are essentially a rubber stamp appointed by those in power.. Er... they were appointed at the direction of the prime minister "in power" at the time, but they each cease to be a "rubber stamp" for that individual (if, indeed they ever were, since the prime minister can do nothing to a senator to make that senator follow the prime minister's diktat) when the prime minister who directed their appointment is "out of power". The majority of senators right now were not chosen by Harper. Quote
PIK Posted February 14, 2013 Report Posted February 14, 2013 Funny how harb is almost forgotton when his is a real joke, getting a house in pembroke, just a little over the 100k from ottawa. That is real fraud but of course he is getting a free ride. Quote Toronto, like a roach motel in the middle of a pretty living room.
cybercoma Posted February 14, 2013 Report Posted February 14, 2013 He is constitutionally required to reside in the province for which he is appointed. Of course, what "residence" means isn't exactly clear. [ed.: sp.] If he can't get medicaid and doesn't qualify for other provincial benefits there, I think it's safe to say he doesn't "reside" there. Quote
g_bambino Posted February 14, 2013 Report Posted February 14, 2013 If he can't get medicaid and doesn't qualify for other provincial benefits there, I think it's safe to say he doesn't "reside" there. Possibly. But, that's still just an opinion. I don't know if there's anything in the Senate's standing rules that state what requirements a senator must meet in order to be considered a resident of the province he or she was appointed. There's certainly nothing in the law. Quote
scribblet Posted February 14, 2013 Report Posted February 14, 2013 Funny how harb is almost forgotton when his is a real joke, getting a house in pembroke, just a little over the 100k from ottawa. That is real fraud but of course he is getting a free ride. The media seems to have collective amnesia on that one. Quote Hey Ho - Ontario Liberals Have to Go - Fight Wynne - save our province
BubberMiley Posted February 14, 2013 Report Posted February 14, 2013 The media seems to have collective amnesia on that one. I realize that playing the "we are victims of the MSM" card is all the CPC has when its dealings are exposed, but what do you make of the fact that the Toronto Star has written about Harb as recently as the last 12 hours? http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2013/02/14/senate_expense_controversy_all_quiet_at_mac_harbs_westmeath_home.html Quote "I think it's fun watching the waldick get all excited/knickers in a knot over something." -scribblet
Peanutbutter Posted February 14, 2013 Report Posted February 14, 2013 I'm not sure if I'd call it a scandal. it's hardly a scandal. How much money are we talking about? A few thousand? If he is found to be misinterpreting the rules he should be made to pay the money back for sure. Quote Ah la peanut butter sandwiches! - The Amazing Mumferd
Topaz Posted February 15, 2013 Report Posted February 15, 2013 There's another side to all of this in my view and it concerns trust and honesty in government. Most Canadians don't trust or believe most politicans as it is and IF Duffy was a residence of PEI, then shouldn't he already have a health card? Does he have an Ontario health card? Quote
Peanutbutter Posted February 15, 2013 Report Posted February 15, 2013 There's another side to all of this in my view and it concerns trust and honesty in government. Most Canadians don't trust or believe most politicans as it is and IF Duffy was a residence of PEI, then shouldn't he already have a health card? Does he have an Ontario health card? I'm certainly not defending his actions, that's for sure. It really doesn't look too good for Senator Duffy and I have a feeling he'll wind up paying it back. I think his primary residence is in Ontario and not in PEI as he is claiming but I'm not on the inside track so who knows really. Quote Ah la peanut butter sandwiches! - The Amazing Mumferd
Guest Posted February 15, 2013 Report Posted February 15, 2013 If he's caught ripping off the taxpayer by cheating on his expenses he should go to jail. They all should, if guilty. Quote
Peanutbutter Posted February 15, 2013 Report Posted February 15, 2013 If he's caught ripping off the taxpayer by cheating on his expenses he should go to jail. They all should, if guilty. There could've been a discrepancy in the interpretation of the guidelines of what's permitted and what's not. If we've learned anything about the government is that the things they publish are hardly in English that normal people can understand. We all should be patient, not jump to conclusions and only make a decision once all the information is made public which is not happening right now. Quote Ah la peanut butter sandwiches! - The Amazing Mumferd
Guest Posted February 15, 2013 Report Posted February 15, 2013 Absolutely. That's why I said, if guilty. Quote
WWWTT Posted February 15, 2013 Report Posted February 15, 2013 There's another side to all of this in my view and it concerns trust and honesty in government. Most Canadians don't trust or believe most politicans as it is and IF Duffy was a residence of PEI, then shouldn't he already have a health card? Does he have an Ontario health card? Lack of trust in politicians typically favour conservative/republican politicians. during voting time. WWWTT Quote Maple Leaf Web is now worth $720.00! Down over $1,500 in less than one year! Total fail of the moderation on this site! That reminds me, never ask Greg to be a business partner! NEVER!
jacee Posted February 15, 2013 Report Posted February 15, 2013 (edited) Lack of trust in politicians typically favour conservative/republican politicians. during voting time. WWWTT Harper could have made better choices for senators, but he couldn’t help himself. So great is his contempt for democratic governance that he felt obliged to fill the senate with the ethically challenged and other losers. While others are decrying the descent into bathos, the Senate farce could be seen as just another arrow in Harper’s voter-suppression quiver. The more public disdain for government, in Harper’s calculations, the better. http://rosslandtelegraph.com/news/comment-brazeau-harper-and-idle-no-more-23253#.UR471jdZ6JI Harper knows exactly what he's doing: Concentrating all power in his own hands. Edited February 15, 2013 by jacee Quote
Topaz Posted February 15, 2013 Report Posted February 15, 2013 I can't see what difference it make being elected or appointed, it all about the person's life experience and character and so far some of these "new" people have a character flaw. how does a senator being elected make a better, upright and trustworthy senator? I'm totally against getting rid of the senator because then we have a more powerful parliament and depending on the PM, we could created more of a problem, unless rules were changed about the power the PMO has. Quote
Shakeyhands Posted February 15, 2013 Report Posted February 15, 2013 I realize that playing the "we are victims of the MSM" card is all the CPC has when its dealings are exposed, but what do you make of the fact that the Toronto Star has written about Harb as recently as the last 12 hours? http://www.thestar.c...meath_home.html it's the usual "DEFLECT" defense. It's all the CPC has.... Quote "They muddy the water, to make it seem deep." - Friedrich Nietzsche
shortlived Posted February 16, 2013 Report Posted February 16, 2013 (edited) resident means to have a permanent residence (as opposed to temporary residence) you reside at except in quebec where you just need to hold property Edited February 16, 2013 by shortlived Quote My posts are sometimes edited to create spelling errors if you see one kindly notify me. These edits do not show up as edits as my own edits do, so it is either site moderation, or third party moderation. This includes changing words completely. If a word looks out of place in a message kindly contact me so I can correct it. These changes are not exclusive to this website, and is either a form of net stalking by a malicious hacker, or perhaps government, it has been ongoing for years now.
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.