Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

The drug trade exists on both sides of the border. Drugs are produced on both sides of the border. Guns are used in the drug trade on both sides of the border. The guns used in the drug trade primarily come from one side of the border. A drug cannot kill you unless you consent to take it. Someone let me know when guns can only be used to commit suicide.

Edited by Wilber

"Never trust a man who has not a single redeeming vice". WSC

  • Replies 270
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest American Woman
Posted

The drug trade exists on both sides of the border. Drugs are produced on both sides of the border. Guns are used in the drug trade on both sides of the border. The guns used in the drug trade primarily come from one side of the border. A drug cannot kill you unless you consent to take it. Someone let me know when guns can only be used to commit suicide.

Drugs most definitely do account for the deaths of innocent people. Are you truly unaware of that?

Posted

Drugs most definitely do account for the deaths of innocent people. Are you truly unaware of that?

How do you define innocent?

"Never trust a man who has not a single redeeming vice". WSC

Guest American Woman
Posted (edited)

How do you define innocent?

As not involved. How do you define innocent?

Edited to add:

Some would argue that if its only gangsters killing each other in the drug trade then we shouldn't give a shit. Well its not just gangsters killing each other - innocent people are injured and killed all the time - and its drug prohibitions fault. End the drug war, end this senseless violence.

Edited by American Woman
Guest American Woman
Posted

These people are being shot by drugs? Thanks for making my point.

Then by the same token, guns don't kill anyone, people do.

Posted

Then by the same token, guns don't kill anyone, people do.

No, one cannot be killed by a people hurling a bag of pot. At least it's bloody unlikely.

"Never trust a man who has not a single redeeming vice". WSC

Guest American Woman
Posted

No, one cannot be killed by a people hurling a bag of pot. At least it's bloody unlikely.

But people can be bloody killed in the crossfire of a drug deal - or by someone on drugs. Which was my point. If you want to continue to deny that innocent people aren't killed because of drugs, go for it. Apparently you need to believe it for some reason. :unsure:

Posted

But people can be bloody killed in the crossfire of a drug deal - or by someone on drugs. Which was my point. If you want to continue to deny that innocent people aren't killed because of drugs, go for it. Apparently you need to believe it for some reason. :unsure:

Look, you can't kill someone with a gun if you don't have one. That at least should be obvious to you.

"Never trust a man who has not a single redeeming vice". WSC

Guest American Woman
Posted

Look, you can't kill someone with a gun if you don't have one. That at least should be obvious to you.

I'd tell you what's obvious to me, but the forum rules prevent it. :)

Guest American Woman
Posted

So it's not obvious to you. OK.

What's obvious to me is that you either can't see that innocent people are killed because of drugs (and not just by guns), or you can't admit it. Either way, it doesn't look good on you. I'll leave it at that - and if you still feel the need to go on about it, you'll just be furthering my point.

Posted

What's obvious to me is that you either can't see that innocent people are killed because of drugs (and not just by guns), or you can't admit it. Either way, it doesn't look good on you. I'll leave it at that - and if you still feel the need to go on about it, you'll just be furthering my point.

Of course they are killed because of drugs. With guns !

"Never trust a man who has not a single redeeming vice". WSC

Guest American Woman
Posted

Of course they are killed because of drugs. With guns !

Which brings us full circle right back to my original statement.

Guest American Woman
Posted

No it doesn't but who cares any more.

Yeah, it does; and evidently you care - since you responded. :)

Posted

Yeah, it does; and evidently you care - since you responded. :)

Eventually I know when to stop waisting my time and I haven't stayed married for 43 years by insisting on the last word.

"Never trust a man who has not a single redeeming vice". WSC

Guest American Woman
Posted

Eventually I know when to stop waisting my time and I haven't stayed married for 43 years by insisting on the last word.

So have you figured out that it's time to stop yet? :D

Posted

Eventually I know when to stop waisting my time and I haven't stayed married for 43 years by insisting on the last word.

:)

I hear that!

“There is a limit to how much we can constantly say no to the political masters in Washington. All we had was Afghanistan to wave. On every other file we were offside. Eventually we came onside on Haiti, so we got another arrow in our quiver."

--Bill Graham, Former Canadian Foreign Minister, 2007

  • 4 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,015
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    agackibal
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...