punked Posted April 15, 2012 Report Share Posted April 15, 2012 It could. What do you propose should be taught about it? In other words, what would be the purpose of teaching them about it? - do you think it should be taught strictly be in regards to teaching them about homosexuality? Please elaborate on how it could harm them? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest American Woman Posted April 15, 2012 Report Share Posted April 15, 2012 Please elaborate on how it could harm them? After you answer my questions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest American Woman Posted April 15, 2012 Report Share Posted April 15, 2012 I think Tennessee should go a step further and add "birth" to things that can lead to sex... no sense leaving anything out at all. People should know ALL of the gateway activities! Once again. The title of this thread is misleading as "Tennessee" has not said that hand holding is a gateway to sex; that is simply some people's interpretation of the bill. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Squid Posted April 15, 2012 Report Share Posted April 15, 2012 Once again. The title of this thread is misleading as "Tennessee" has not said that hand holding is a gateway to sex; that is simply some people's interpretation of the bill. Then what is? If they are legislating against "it", shouldn't they define "it"? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Squid Posted April 15, 2012 Report Share Posted April 15, 2012 I know that's how it's presented in the media, and while there's some truth to it, it's not exactly the total picture either. California, for example, is among the top 10 states with the highest teen pregnancy rates - while Tennessee is not. It's not presented in the media, because what you say is not true! Lol Tennessee is #9. California is #15. http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/USTPtrends.pdf Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shakeyhands Posted April 16, 2012 Report Share Posted April 16, 2012 Once again. The title of this thread is misleading as "Tennessee" has not said that hand holding is a gateway to sex; that is simply some people's interpretation of the bill. Sorry, I was just trying to make someone laugh.... my bad. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GostHacked Posted April 16, 2012 Report Share Posted April 16, 2012 (edited) Why not let parents be responsible to teach their kids about sex? Why is this kind of thing left up to the state? Because when you do, this type of shit happens. Parents take back control of your children and don't put up with this crap. http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2012/04/nj_principal_who_told_students_2.html Blackmore caused an uproar in March when he told his more than 900 students thet they were in a "no hugging school" because of some "incidents of unsuitable, physical interactions."School Superintendent David Healy said at the time that the district has the responsibility to teach children about appropriate interactions. But he said no one would be disciplined for hugging. Maybe this next one should be in the 'Florida' thread. http://www.myfoxorlando.com/dpp/news/brevard_news/110311-students-suspended-for-hugging PALM BAY, Fla. (WOFL FOX 35) - A hug can brighten your day. It's so popular, there has even been a hug campaign around the world. But the gesture got some Palm Bay Southwest Middle School students into big trouble."I thought it was the most bizarre thing I've ever heard," said Nancy Crescente, the mother of 14-year-old Nickolas Martinez. "We're a cultural family and this is what we do." Crescente said both her son and the 14-year-old girl who was the recipient of the hug were suspended. She says she wasn't notified about the suspensions until afterwards. "They said this is what they do across the board, it is what it is. And that was that." School administrators said a committee of parents approved the "no hugging" policy years ago, and there aren't plans to change it any time soon. Edited April 16, 2012 by GostHacked Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheNewTeddy Posted April 16, 2012 Report Share Posted April 16, 2012 Dear Tennessee My bare forearm once rubbed up against the bare forearm of another man Does this mean I'm gay? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Hardner Posted April 16, 2012 Report Share Posted April 16, 2012 Why not let parents be responsible to teach their kids about sex? Why is this kind of thing left up to the state? Because when you do, this type of shit happens. Parents take back control of your children and don't put up with this crap. Why not ? Maybe because parents don't do it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GostHacked Posted April 16, 2012 Report Share Posted April 16, 2012 Why not ? Maybe because parents don't do it. Then they should not have children if they don't want the responsibility. Simple as that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BubberMiley Posted April 16, 2012 Report Share Posted April 16, 2012 Simple as that. Not that simple. What if they have children even though they shouldn't have? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GostHacked Posted April 16, 2012 Report Share Posted April 16, 2012 Not that simple. It is that simple. People like to make a real simple thing difficult. What if they have children even though they shouldn't have? And how is that the State's problem? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Hardner Posted April 16, 2012 Report Share Posted April 16, 2012 And how is that the State's problem? Unwanted children brought up by families who don't plan, don't pay attention to good advice.... You don't see how this can cause problems for the state ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest American Woman Posted April 16, 2012 Report Share Posted April 16, 2012 It is that simple. People like to make a real simple thing difficult. It is that simple, eh? So what's your plan to stop them from having kids? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest American Woman Posted April 16, 2012 Report Share Posted April 16, 2012 Dear TennesseeMy bare forearm once rubbed up against the bare forearm of another man Does this mean I'm gay? Dear TheNewTeddy, Once again I feel compelled to repeat that it's not Tennessee saying that holding hands is a gateway to sex. Tennessee is not putting out all the hyperbole. Once again I will point out that it is only some people's interpretation of the bill. Sincerely, American Woman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest American Woman Posted April 16, 2012 Report Share Posted April 16, 2012 It's not presented in the media, because what you say is not true! Lol Tennessee is #9. California is #15. http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/USTPtrends.pdf For that year, that study (which, btw, includes estimated numbers of pregnancies ending in miscarriage or stillbirth, so I question the accuracy of the reality), Tennessee is 9 and California is 15; other studies, other years, show different results. I was looking at earlier stats. In 2010, Tennessee fell to #10, as their rate of teen pregnancy fell in accordance with the rest of the country, in spite of their sex education classes stressing abstinence. But here's the thing - sex education isn't the only factor in teen pregnancy rates, so as I said, the claim being made doesn't tell the whole sotry. Other studies, other claims, say that low income is a factor, while others say that wide income discrepancies is a factor, as others still say that the rate of teen pregnancy is higher among Blacks and Hispanics. In New Hampshire, for example, the state with the lowest teen pregnancy rate, Blacks make up 1% of the population compared to 17% in Tennessee. I would say that overall income is also more of a factor in Tennessee. Yet the headlines say it's because of "abstinence being taught in sex education." As I said, those headlines are not exactly taking into account the total picture. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BubberMiley Posted April 16, 2012 Report Share Posted April 16, 2012 (edited) And how is that the State's problem? You could make the same argument against education in general. Learned people decided long ago that certain burdens on society could be reduced with an educated populace. They experimented with a novel concept called public education whereby all children would learn things that it was to everyone's benefit that they know, and they even made it illegal to not send your kids to school. Edited April 16, 2012 by BubberMiley Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Squid Posted April 16, 2012 Report Share Posted April 16, 2012 Dear TheNewTeddy, Once again I feel compelled to repeat that it's not Tennessee saying that holding hands is a gateway to sex. Tennessee is not putting out all the hyperbole. Once again I will point out that it is only some people's interpretation of the bill. Sincerely, American Woman Can you inform us as to what acts constitute a "gateway to sex" act? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GostHacked Posted April 16, 2012 Report Share Posted April 16, 2012 Question do you think it will do them harm to learn about it? How about letting kids ... be kids. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GostHacked Posted April 16, 2012 Report Share Posted April 16, 2012 Can you inform us as to what acts constitute a "gateway to sex" act? It's like saying pot is a gateway drug to harder substances. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GostHacked Posted April 16, 2012 Report Share Posted April 16, 2012 You could make the same argument against education in general. Learned people decided long ago that certain burdens on society could be reduced with an educated populace. They experimented with a novel concept called public education whereby all children would learn things that it was to everyone's benefit that they know, and they even made it illegal to not send your kids to school. If parents want to homeschool their children, they should have the option to. They should not be punished for it. I probably could have benefited from homeschooling... I did not do very well in high school. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest American Woman Posted April 16, 2012 Report Share Posted April 16, 2012 If parents want to homeschool their children, they should have the option to. They should not be punished for it. I probably could have benefited from homeschooling... I did not do very well in high school. Where aren't parents allowed to homeschool their children? How are they punished for it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GostHacked Posted April 16, 2012 Report Share Posted April 16, 2012 Where aren't parents allowed to homeschool their children? How are they punished for it? Look up truancy laws. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truancy Truancy is any intentional unauthorized or illegal absence from compulsory schooling. The term describes absences caused by students of their own free will, and usually does not refer to legitimate "excused" absences, such as ones related to medical conditions. The term's exact meaning differs from school to school, and is usually explicitly defined in the school's handbook of policies and procedures.[citation needed] It has no relation to homeschooling, although sometimes parents who practice homeschooling have been charged with this.[1] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest American Woman Posted April 16, 2012 Report Share Posted April 16, 2012 Look up truancy laws. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truancy Parents who homeschool are expected to actually teach their children and the children are expected to put in school time at home. Did you read the source you cited? The charge is for parents who allow their children to be truant from school, claim they are going to homeschool them, and then don't. I certainly agree that parents who homeschool should be held to certain standards. Do you disagree? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GostHacked Posted April 16, 2012 Report Share Posted April 16, 2012 Parents who homeschool are expected to actually teach their children and the children are expected to put in school time at home. Did you read the source you cited? The charge is for parents who allow their children to be truant from school, claim they are going to homeschool them, and then don't. Sure some people will take advantage of anything when they can. Most good people don't. I certainly agree that parents who homeschool should be held to certain standards. Do you disagree? Sure, as long as home schooled children can pass the government state run school tests, then there is no problem. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.