bud Posted December 22, 2011 Report Posted December 22, 2011 (edited) and covering the face? that's practiced only in a few countries. majority of muslim women in majority of muslim countries do not cover their faces. it's something that came from wahabism and if you ask most muslims, they do not agree with it. Edited December 22, 2011 by bud Quote http://whoprofits.org/
cybercoma Posted December 22, 2011 Report Posted December 22, 2011 (edited) Family violence is against the law in Canada. Although the Criminal Code does not have a specific "family violence offence", an abuser can be charged with an applicable offence. Criminal charges could include: • assault • assault causing bodily harm • sexual assault • sexual assault causing bodily harm • sexual assault with a weapon • criminal harassment (sometimes called "stalking") • uttering threats • mischief • intimidation • forcible confinement • attempted murder, and • murder So it is against the law; an abuser can be charged with an applicable offense. Which is, semantics aside, the same thing, as in the end, it amounts to the same thing. So it's the reality that I'm interested in and it's the reality that I referred to. I didn't say family violence was legal. I said there is no specific domestic violence law in Canada. And what I meant by that is that it's not in the criminal code as its own offense. In other words, your link shows that I was right. Edited December 22, 2011 by cybercoma Quote
GostHacked Posted December 22, 2011 Report Posted December 22, 2011 And that observation is completely irrelevant to anything I said in my post. How so? Quote
cybercoma Posted December 22, 2011 Report Posted December 22, 2011 (edited) No, it wouldn't. First of all, as I said, I think a fine will hit "the man/men of the house" harder than it will the woman who is oppressedWow. That's great. Fine the woman because the man will have to pay it. Do you have any idea how sexist that sounds? What about single Muslim women that wear it? Fine their fathers? What if he's dead; fine their brothers?You could just fine the husband if his wife is seen in public with a niqab. Of course, then you could have a case where you encourage the husband to get angry and violent with his wife if she insists on wearing it because he'll have to pay the charges. Why can't you just admit that punishing the victim for the crimes of their abuser is just a really terrible idea? Moreover, your ideas have yet to address the fact that many women may choose to wear it of their own volition. In which case, you just created a crime out of wearing religious clothing that you find unacceptable. Edited December 22, 2011 by cybercoma Quote
Guest American Woman Posted December 22, 2011 Report Posted December 22, 2011 American Woman, on 22 December 2011 - 02:14 PM, said: And that observation is completely irrelevant to anything I said in my post. How so? It doesn't have anything to do with anything that I said. Quote
Tilter Posted December 22, 2011 Report Posted December 22, 2011 wow. just wow. how many muslims do you know? how many times have you read the Quran?, It in it'self is a guide to oppression, slavery, misogamy,cruelty and murder. Quote
cybercoma Posted December 22, 2011 Report Posted December 22, 2011 how many times have you read the Quran?, It in it'self is a guide to oppression, slavery, misogamy,cruelty and murder. What's misogamy? Quote
Black Dog Posted December 22, 2011 Report Posted December 22, 2011 how many times have you read the Quran?, It in it'self is a guide to oppression, slavery, misogamy,cruelty and murder. So a bit like the Old Testament, then. A cracking work of fiction. Quote
The_Squid Posted December 22, 2011 Report Posted December 22, 2011 So a bit like the Old Testament, then. A cracking work of fiction. Exactly so.... Quote
The_Squid Posted December 22, 2011 Report Posted December 22, 2011 What's misogamy? You really couldn't figure out what that meant? You have never made a spelling mistake before? Are you really this petty? In real life too, or just on internet forums? Quote
DogOnPorch Posted December 22, 2011 Report Posted December 22, 2011 Exactly so.... Except the fellows really keen on Islam will liberate your head from your neck in this year, 711 2011. Quote Nothing cracks a turtle like Leon Uris.
The_Squid Posted December 22, 2011 Report Posted December 22, 2011 Except the fellows really keen on Islam will liberate your head from your neck in this year, 711 2011. Quite true. There are extremists in nearly every religion.... what would a KKK member do to a Jew in the name of his holy book? Quote
GostHacked Posted December 22, 2011 Report Posted December 22, 2011 how many times have you read the Quran?, It in it'self is a guide to oppression, slavery, misogamy,cruelty and murder. Kind of like the Bible then. Quote
GostHacked Posted December 22, 2011 Report Posted December 22, 2011 It doesn't have anything to do with anything that I said. The last 30 some pages have been irrelevant to the thread. I guess this is the new MLW status quo. Carry on. Quote
WWWTT Posted December 22, 2011 Report Posted December 22, 2011 And what I meant by that is that it's not in the criminal code as its own offense. In other words, your link shows that I was right. This could be true. However in Canada and many other western nations,when the police are dispatched to a reported domestic dispute call a specific procedure is followed unique to family/spouce abuse/violence WWWTT Quote Maple Leaf Web is now worth $720.00! Down over $1,500 in less than one year! Total fail of the moderation on this site! That reminds me, never ask Greg to be a business partner! NEVER!
bud Posted December 22, 2011 Report Posted December 22, 2011 how many times have you read the Quran?, It in it'self is a guide to oppression, slavery, misogamy,cruelty and murder. i've seen the verses in the koran and i've seen them in the bible, including the old testament. so what now? majority of the world are killers/oppressors/slave owners/rapists? Quote http://whoprofits.org/
cybercoma Posted December 22, 2011 Report Posted December 22, 2011 This could be true. However in Canada and many other western nations,when the police are dispatched to a reported domestic dispute call a specific procedure is followed unique to family/spouce abuse/violence WWWTT Of course there is. You don't respond to a parent assualting a child the same way you respond to two drunks fighting outside a bar. They're still charged under the same section of the CCC though. This is why judicial discretion is necessay and the reason mandatory minimums are garbage. Quote
DogOnPorch Posted December 22, 2011 Report Posted December 22, 2011 Quite true. There are extremists in nearly every religion.... what would a KKK member do to a Jew in the name of his holy book? Not sure...what's been done lately? Quote Nothing cracks a turtle like Leon Uris.
DogOnPorch Posted December 22, 2011 Report Posted December 22, 2011 i've seen the verses in the koran and i've seen them in the bible, including the old testament. so what now? majority of the world are killers/oppressors/slave owners/rapists? Deeds not words. Quote Nothing cracks a turtle like Leon Uris.
The_Squid Posted December 22, 2011 Report Posted December 22, 2011 Not sure...what's been done lately? That is the fundemental difference. N. America has laws and deterents to such actions. It wasn't that long ago that even in N. Ameerica there were lynchings by Christian sects of blacks. If you think that the KKK has gotten kinder and would never again do such a thing, then you are gravely naive. It is the actions of governments that has curbed this sort of thing, not the temperence of the religious nutbars! Quote
The_Squid Posted December 22, 2011 Report Posted December 22, 2011 Deeds not words. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waco_Siege Religous murderous nutbars are even *gasp* Christians!! Quote
DogOnPorch Posted December 22, 2011 Report Posted December 22, 2011 (edited) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waco_Siege Religous murderous nutbars are even *gasp* Christians!! Waco...long time ago. One crazy dude. Now...let's find a news source and count the various acts of Islamic terror occuring every day. Edited December 23, 2011 by DogOnPorch Quote Nothing cracks a turtle like Leon Uris.
DogOnPorch Posted December 22, 2011 Report Posted December 22, 2011 That is the fundemental difference. N. America has laws and deterents to such actions. It wasn't that long ago that even in N. Ameerica there were lynchings by Christian sects of blacks. If you think that the KKK has gotten kinder and would never again do such a thing, then you are gravely naive. It is the actions of governments that has curbed this sort of thing, not the temperence of the religious nutbars! The KKK may not be kinder...but they are a Hell of a lot smaller. Tell me how many KKK there were in 1921 and how many exist today. Quote Nothing cracks a turtle like Leon Uris.
The_Squid Posted December 22, 2011 Report Posted December 22, 2011 Waco...long time ago. One crazy dude. Now...let's find a news sourse and count the various acts of Islamic terror occuring every day. Not that long ago really... It proves that religious whackos are not just found in any one religion. The KKK may not be kinder...but they are a Hell of a lot smaller. Tell me how many KKK there were in 1921 and how many exist today. The difference is that they used to be able to get away with it. I have no idea how many KKK there were compared to now. I'm sure lots died off and they aren't being indoctrinated into that religious bigotry and violence as children as much any more. Quote
Scotty Posted December 23, 2011 Report Posted December 23, 2011 Not that long ago really... Like, a generation ago? Sorry, but that doesn't qualify. Especially when those were isolated acts by people who were hunted down by the government. Compare to that Iran, which hangs teenage girls for the crime of being raped, or Afghanistan, which makes rape victims go to prison if they don't marry their rapist, or the UAE, where the supreme court specifies how you can beat your wife according to the Koran, or Indonesia, where mobs of crazed Muslims burn down churches and murder people, and the government then charges the members of the church who fought back, or Saudi Arabia, which forces teenagers back into their burning school because their faces aren't covered up. Shall I go on? There is a difference between the acts of a few screwballs who are not accepted even by the Church, and the actions of a society as a whole as accepted by both their church/temple/mosque and their government. Quote It is an inverted moral calculus that tries to persuade the world to demonize one state that tries its civilized best to abide in a difficult time and place, and rides merrily by the examples and practices of dozens of states and leaderships that drop into brutality every day without a twinge of regret or a whisper of condemnation. - Rex Murphy
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.