Shady Posted January 25, 2012 Author Report Posted January 25, 2012 No faster then Bush but then Obama is Black right? So you want Republicans to attack Bush? Huh? Quote
Shady Posted January 25, 2012 Author Report Posted January 25, 2012 No faster then Bush but then Obama is Black right? Oh, and I almost forgot. Yes, they have gone up a lot faster than Bush. So you're basically 0 for 2 in your assumptions so far. Quote
Shady Posted January 25, 2012 Author Report Posted January 25, 2012 Just to summarize punked's dart throwing... You do know it went way up in 92,93,94,95 No it didn't. It actually went the exact opposite of your claim. No faster then Bush but then Obama is Black right? Strike two. Nope, it's actually gone up faster than when Bush was President. I'm beginning to see why you people see race no matter what the subject is. You have absolutely no grasp of reality, and what's really happened, or happening. Quote
maple_leafs182 Posted January 25, 2012 Report Posted January 25, 2012 I keep hearing Newt say he is the anti establishment candidate, what policies does he differ from Romney? Quote │ _______ [███STOP███]▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ :::::::--------------Conservatives beleive ▄▅█FUNDING THIS█▅▄▃▂- - - - - --- -- -- -- -------- Liberals lie I██████████████████] ...◥⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙'(='.'=)' ⊙
sharkman Posted January 25, 2012 Report Posted January 25, 2012 I don't think he differs terribly, he's just got conviction about it, while Romney is kind of a wet noodle. Quote
cybercoma Posted January 25, 2012 Report Posted January 25, 2012 So you want Republicans to attack Bush? Huh? No. He expect you not to be a partisan hack and criticize Republicans and Democrats equally for the same issues. Quote
Shady Posted January 25, 2012 Author Report Posted January 25, 2012 No. He expect you not to be a partisan hack and criticize Republicans and Democrats equally for the same issues. That's not what the discussion was about. Anyways, back on to the campaign. Looks like Gingrich was forced to retreat on his attack of Romney's immigration stance. Sen. Marco Rubio scolded Newt Gingrich’s presidential campaign over a Spanish-language radio ad that accuses rival Mitt Romney of being “anti-immigrant.”“This kind of language is more than just unfortunate. It’s inaccurate, inflammatory, and doesn’t belong in this campaign,” Rubio told The Miami Herald when asked about the ad In the wake of Sen. Marco Rubio’s denunciation of Newt Gingrich’s ad calling Mitt Romney ‘anti-immigrant,’ the Romney campaign’s Hispanic leadership team — headlined by former Sen. Mel Martinez — is demanding that Gingrich pull down the radio spot. Apparently Gingrich has agreed to pull the ad. Looks like that blew up in his face, and could probably cost him winning Florida. Quote
Smallc Posted January 25, 2012 Report Posted January 25, 2012 Thank goodness for the Republicans....although, at his point, I don't see either potential candidate beating Obama. Quote
punked Posted January 25, 2012 Report Posted January 25, 2012 (edited) That's not what the discussion was about. Anyways, back on to the campaign. Looks like Gingrich was forced to retreat on his attack of Romney's immigration stance. Apparently Gingrich has agreed to pull the ad. Looks like that blew up in his face, and could probably cost him winning Florida. What lies from Gingrich of course Romney loves illegals heck he even employed them till he got caught right? Edited January 25, 2012 by punked Quote
Shady Posted January 25, 2012 Author Report Posted January 25, 2012 I don't see either potential candidate beating Obama. It'll be tough. Defeating an incumbant president is always difficult. Quote
sharkman Posted January 25, 2012 Report Posted January 25, 2012 So Shady, you don't think the unemployed, the new bankrupt and the food stamp users will take it out on Obama and vote with their pocket books? Quote
Smallc Posted January 25, 2012 Report Posted January 25, 2012 It'll be tough. Defeating an incumbant president is always difficult. It's unfortunate, but I just don't see them as being Obama's equals, and I don't think I'm alone there. An Obama - Romney debate won't, IMO, end well for Romney. Quote
cybercoma Posted January 25, 2012 Report Posted January 25, 2012 It's just too bad we won't get to see a Perry-Obama debate. Quote
Shady Posted January 25, 2012 Author Report Posted January 25, 2012 It's unfortunate, but I just don't see them as being Obama's equals, and I don't think I'm alone there. An Obama - Romney debate won't, IMO, end well for Romney. I disagree. Romney would fair pretty well. Obama's going to be on the defensive this time, trying to defend his pathetic record and litany of broken promises. No more blaming everyone else like he did in '08. Quote
Smallc Posted January 25, 2012 Report Posted January 25, 2012 I just don't see either one of these Republicans as strong candidates. Quote
maple_leafs182 Posted January 25, 2012 Report Posted January 25, 2012 Paul could beat Obama if the Republicans got behind him. Paul attracts more youth, active duty military, independents and democrats then any of the other candidates. Quote │ _______ [███STOP███]▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ :::::::--------------Conservatives beleive ▄▅█FUNDING THIS█▅▄▃▂- - - - - --- -- -- -- -------- Liberals lie I██████████████████] ...◥⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙'(='.'=)' ⊙
bush_cheney2004 Posted January 25, 2012 Report Posted January 25, 2012 Paul could beat Obama if the Republicans got behind him. Paul attracts more youth, active duty military, independents and democrats then any of the other candidates. Not likely, as Paul has already lost two previous election cycles. I guess more "youth, active duty military, independents, and democrats" didn't like him that much. Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
Shady Posted January 25, 2012 Author Report Posted January 25, 2012 I just don't see either one of these Republicans as strong candidates. That's ok. Obama isn't a strong candidate either. Quote
bud Posted January 25, 2012 Report Posted January 25, 2012 It's just too bad we won't get to see a Perry-Obama debate. lols Quote http://whoprofits.org/
Shady Posted January 26, 2012 Author Report Posted January 26, 2012 I think you underestimate him. How's that? I said that the odds are he'll win re-election. Quote
sharkman Posted January 26, 2012 Report Posted January 26, 2012 It's just too bad we won't get to see a Perry-Obama debate. I'd love to see a Newt-Obama debate. I doubt that'll happen either. Quote
Shady Posted January 26, 2012 Author Report Posted January 26, 2012 So Shady, you don't think the unemployed, the new bankrupt and the food stamp users will take it out on Obama and vote with their pocket books? I do. However, never underestimate the power of the bully pulpit, and a mainstream news media doing everything in its power to help him out. Quote
Shady Posted January 26, 2012 Author Report Posted January 26, 2012 I'd love to see a Newt-Obama debate. I doubt that'll happen either. That would definitely be sweet. Obama would get the thrashing of his life! Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.