Jump to content

Long-gun registry to be shot down Thursday


Recommended Posts

Guest Derek L
Posted

http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/Politics/2011/10/19/18850681.html

And good riddance……It truly has been ridiculous and an insult to hunters, sports shooters, farmers and ranchers………

While the order paper notice only hints at amendments to the Firearms Act, a source close to the file told QMI Agency the bill is expected to fully repeal the requirement to register long-guns. It will also re-write the Firearms Act to specify only restricted and prohibited firearms need to be registered.

Now will it redefine what’s restricted and prohibited? Here’s hoping…….

  • Replies 304
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

And good riddance……It truly has been ridiculous and an insult to hunters, sports shooters, farmers and ranchers………

Oh well, it's not like Harper won't have all sorts of new ways soon to keep tabs on who you are and what you do.

Now will it redefine what’s restricted and prohibited? Here’s hoping…….

Be careful what you wish for.

A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.

Posted

The millions of Canadians who never did register their weapons will greet this news with.... indifference.

I don't think so. I don't own a gun but I think this law is simple pandering to sensationalists.

Legal gun-owners aren't the problem. It's illegal hand-gun owners that are the problem.

Posted

Be careful what you wish for.

Why should he be careful? Some of the things considered restricted are absolutely ridiculous.

Posted (edited)

Why should he be careful? Some of the things considered restricted are absolutely ridiculous.

What's really ridiculous is how the things that most anti-gun control people want the state to prohibit causes so much of the gun crime that gets them most excited.

It's not as vicious a circle as much as a really stupid one.

Edited by eyeball

A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.

Posted (edited)

You mean like how I'm in favour of legalizing marijuana and prostitution, as well as decriminalizing some other problem drugs?

Edited by Smallc
Posted

You mean like how I'm in favour of legalizing marijuana and prostitution, as well as decriminalizing some other problem drugs?

Sorry but I've heard all this get the state off the people's backs stuff before from small-c conservatives. Maybe you should come talk to us when YOU have 100% of all the power in this country. You don't seem to have anymore than anyone else when it comes to Harper's crew.

I'm actually all for getting rid of the ridiculous gun registry too - now we can move past this charade and straight on to gun control like we should have in the first place.

A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.

Posted

You mean like how I'm in favour of legalizing marijuana and prostitution,

Booya.

"A man is no more entitled to an opinion for which he cannot account than he is for a pint of beer for which he cannot pay" - Anonymous

Posted
I don't think so.
I'm quite sure of it. Many, make that very many, other wise law abiding Canadians simply ignored the long gun registry, and they will greet the repeal of the registry legislation with the same response they met the introduction: they'll ignore it.

It was an ongoing problem for regulators and cops:how do you enforce a law that is widely ignored by ordinary people? In this case, ignored by both ordinary peope and criminals.

The government should do something.

Posted

I don't think so. I don't own a gun but I think this law is simple pandering to sensationalists.

Legal gun-owners aren't the problem. It's illegal hand-gun owners that are the problem.

Was it a hand gun that killed the RCMP out west? Do hunters or farmer`s or anyone who have rifle, chose a hand kill to their spouse or some else. ALL guns are dangerous.

Posted

Was it a hand gun that killed the RCMP out west? Do hunters or farmer`s or anyone who have rifle, chose a hand kill to their spouse or some else. ALL guns are dangerous.

And how does the registry prevent crime?

Guest Derek L
Posted

Oh well, it's not like Harper won't have all sorts of new ways soon to keep tabs on who you are and what you do.

Not if you have a Tin-foil hat...

Guest Derek L
Posted (edited)

Why should he be careful? Some of the things considered restricted are absolutely ridiculous.

Exactly………some guns were banned because they looked scary or have an “aggressive name”………Those that crafted the laws, know next to nothing related to the subject mater….

Edited by Derek L
Posted

Exactly. A semi auto that looks like an M16 isn't an M16, nor is a BB gun that looks like an AK47 (look to a recent news report for that).

That said, I do agree with stringent licensing requirements as well as regulations regarding the size of clips that are allowed. I also agree with the regulations regarding handguns and automatic weapons, even if I don't agree with registration of them.

Guest Derek L
Posted

Was it a hand gun that killed the RCMP out west? Do hunters or farmer`s or anyone who have rifle, chose a hand kill to their spouse or some else. ALL guns are dangerous.

No a gun is a tool………It can be turned into a weapon by a person, much like a baseball bat, steak knife or a Toyota.

And the Mayerthorpe tragedy was committed by a man with a rifle......

Posted

No a gun is a tool………It can be turned into a weapon by a person, much like a baseball bat, steak knife or a Toyota.

It is a very effective tool when it comes to killing though.

Guest Derek L
Posted

It is a very effective tool when it comes to killing though.

Like a car, depends on the human operating it.......I own various handguns, shotguns, bolt action, semi-auto and pump rifles…….I have for decades……I got a 10/22 when I was 8 years old……..my fifteen year old son, under my supervision, handles firearms……….never once have my firearms posed a threat to another person.

Guest Derek L
Posted

Bad analogy. A car is a horribly ineffective tool for killing.

How many Canadian die each year in car related deaths as opposed to guns?

Guest Derek L
Posted

relevance ?

Bad analogy. A car is a horribly ineffective tool for killing.
Posted

How many people have used a car to kill?

I'm a little too busy to google it right now, but many. If you include suicides, very meny.

The government can't give anything to anyone without having first taken it from someone else.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,910
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    AlembicoEMR
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...