Bryan Posted December 13, 2010 Report Posted December 13, 2010 Funny how so many people think that they know what SunTV's programming will and will not be, all without it having begun broadcasting. Quote
Shwa Posted December 13, 2010 Report Posted December 13, 2010 You talk like a North Korean ... I don't know why sending somebody to an institution of supposed 'higher learning' is a solution to the ignorance problem in this country. Those institutions regularly spread ignorance. They churn out a misinformed product that has more interest in Lady Gaga than in the issues of the day. This is an interesting comment. Since it has been amply proven the institutions of "higher learning" do not spread ignorance, but actualy comabt it, your comment is thus ignorant. This reveals some things about you, least of which is your complete lack of humour. And, by your use of the phrase "a misinformed product" I believe you might be a bit of a sociopath too. Kind of like Jethro meets Dalmer. Quote
dre Posted December 14, 2010 Report Posted December 14, 2010 Why do you watch CNN, and FOX? The main point here is what "news" do Canadian taxpayers are forced to pay for. I dont watch them. I dont even have cable TV! Quote I question things because I am human. And call no one my father who's no closer than a stranger
Saipan Posted December 15, 2010 Report Posted December 15, 2010 I dont watch them. I dont even have cable TV! Do you often criticize something you don't see? Quote
bloodyminded Posted December 15, 2010 Report Posted December 15, 2010 I don't think Suntv wil be good or bad for Canadian democracy. Any more than "So you think can dance," it's intellectual equal, has any delineated good or ill effects. Quote As scarce as truth is, the supply has always been in excess of the demand. --Josh Billings
bloodyminded Posted December 15, 2010 Report Posted December 15, 2010 To balance CBC spin. Yep. Got to "balance" that establishment centrism with something further right. Quote As scarce as truth is, the supply has always been in excess of the demand. --Josh Billings
Saipan Posted December 15, 2010 Report Posted December 15, 2010 Yep. Got to "balance" that establishment centrism with something further right. Yep. Got to balance that Liberal establishment with something politically incorrect. Quote
Saipan Posted December 15, 2010 Report Posted December 15, 2010 And it must be supported by our taxes. Just like CBC. Quote
bloodyminded Posted December 15, 2010 Report Posted December 15, 2010 Yep. Got to balance that Liberal establishment with something politically incorrect. Oh, don't worry, the political Right is knee-deep in political correctness at all times. Don't forget to Support The Troops. Quote As scarce as truth is, the supply has always been in excess of the demand. --Josh Billings
Saipan Posted December 15, 2010 Report Posted December 15, 2010 Oh, don't worry, the political Right is knee-deep in political correctness at all times. Then you have nothing to worry about. We can hold hands and sing Kumbaya Quote
bloodyminded Posted December 15, 2010 Report Posted December 15, 2010 Then you have nothing to worry about. I already said I wasn't worried about the whole matter. Of course, you'd have to scroll back an impossible number of posts--say, seven or so--to find this out. Much easier to just assume things, eh? Quote As scarce as truth is, the supply has always been in excess of the demand. --Josh Billings
Saipan Posted December 15, 2010 Report Posted December 15, 2010 I already said I wasn't worried about the whole matter. That makes two of us Quote
Evening Star Posted December 17, 2010 Report Posted December 17, 2010 See CanCon Rules and Howard Stern! As I suspected, the CRTC never banned Howard Stern. Whatever actions were taken were taken by stations themselves or by the CBSC, a non-government industry self-regulating organization. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sirius_Canada#Howard_Stern http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/archive/1999/DB99-554.htm http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/archive/1998/DB98-213.HTM Quote
bush_cheney2004 Posted December 17, 2010 Report Posted December 17, 2010 As I suspected, the CRTC never banned Howard Stern. Whatever actions were taken were taken by stations themselves or by the CBSC, a non-government industry self-regulating organization. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sirius_Canada#Howard_Stern http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/archive/1999/DB99-554.htm http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/archive/1998/DB98-213.HTM Read the fine print: Sirius Canada later announced that Howard Stern's two channels, Howard 100 and Howard 101, would not be available to its Canadian customers. Naturally this has generated negative response from Canadian fans of Stern, some of whom have claimed that they would not subscribe to any service absent the two Stern channels. According to Gary Slaight, CEO of Standard Broadcasting: The CRTC, who we are licensed to, would eventually force us to take Stern down, because we have standards we have to abide by in this country when you own a broadcasting licence.[5] Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
Shady Posted December 17, 2010 Report Posted December 17, 2010 The Canadian Sun News TV channel has been dubbed Fox News North and when it debuts on January 1, 2011, it will duplicate the Fox News 24-hour news channel format of news/opinion programming, which is a type of programming that has never been done before in Canada. Your premise is completely wrong. The format of news/opinion programming has definitely been done before in Canada. And still is. It's called CBC. It just may not be the opinion you agree with. Bad for democracy? I'd say media owned and controlled by the government is worse for democracy than private news organizations offering a combination of news during the day, and then opinion usually during the evenings. Was Al Jazeera Canada bad for democracy? Cause I don't remember those questions being asked. I guess there's a bit of selective outrage going on out there. Quote
Shakeyhands Posted December 17, 2010 Report Posted December 17, 2010 Read the fine print: Sirius Canada later announced that Howard Stern's two channels, Howard 100 and Howard 101, would not be available to its Canadian customers. Naturally this has generated negative response from Canadian fans of Stern, some of whom have claimed that they would not subscribe to any service absent the two Stern channels. According to Gary Slaight, CEO of Standard Broadcasting: The CRTC, who we are licensed to, would eventually force us to take Stern down, because we have standards we have to abide by in this country when you own a broadcasting licence.[5] Thats odd. I listen to Howard almost everyday... Quote "They muddy the water, to make it seem deep." - Friedrich Nietzsche
Shakeyhands Posted December 17, 2010 Report Posted December 17, 2010 I wonder if Sun TV will adhere to the same standards as Fox news. Quote "They muddy the water, to make it seem deep." - Friedrich Nietzsche
Shwa Posted December 17, 2010 Report Posted December 17, 2010 I wonder if Sun TV will adhere to the same standards as Fox news. Are you referring to these standards? Watching Fox News leaves viewers less informed and more prone to believing misinformation, according to a study conducted by the WorldPublicOpinion.org at the University of Maryland.While regular consumers of news were found to be more informed on issues surrounding the 2010 Senate elections, daily Fox viewers were significantly more likely to believe incorrect information on the economy, climate change and whether or not U.S. President Barack Obama was born in America. Quote
bush_cheney2004 Posted December 17, 2010 Report Posted December 17, 2010 Thats odd. I listen to Howard almost everyday... ...after 2006...with tape delay? Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
Shady Posted December 17, 2010 Report Posted December 17, 2010 Are you referring to these standards? LOL. Another so-called "study" in another attempt to undermine Fox News. It's become quite a trend. You'll find that the institutions and individuals responsible for conducting these "studies" have a vested interest in de-legitimize For News. They begin their studies with that very intention, and make sure the outcome matches their intent. It's getting kind of old. Quote
bush_cheney2004 Posted December 17, 2010 Report Posted December 17, 2010 LOL. Another so-called "study" in another attempt to undermine Fox News. It's become quite a trend. You'll find that the institutions and individuals responsible for conducting these "studies" have a vested interest in de-legitimize For News. They begin their studies with that very intention, and make sure the outcome matches their intent. It's getting kind of old. Funnier still....they want to project a dubious study of "Americans" on the potential impact to Canadians. Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
Black Dog Posted December 17, 2010 Report Posted December 17, 2010 LOL. Another so-called "study" in another attempt to undermine Fox News. It's become quite a trend. You'll find that the institutions and individuals responsible for conducting these "studies" have a vested interest in de-legitimize For News. They begin their studies with that very intention, and make sure the outcome matches their intent. It's getting kind of old. I actually agree. I doubt that even the people who work at Fox News consider it to be a legitimate news source, so I'm not sure why anybody would spend good money on stating the obvious. Quote
Shady Posted December 17, 2010 Report Posted December 17, 2010 I actually agree. I doubt that even the people who work at Fox News consider it to be a legitimate news source, so I'm not sure why anybody would spend good money on stating the obvious. They'd probably disagree. It's just some people don't understand that Fox News does regular news during the day, up until 5pm. Then does regular news at 6pm. But after that it's opinion journalism. Just like MSNBC and CNN. Even CBC tends to do that now. Quote
bush_cheney2004 Posted December 17, 2010 Report Posted December 17, 2010 They'd probably disagree. It's just some people don't understand that Fox News does regular news during the day, up until 5pm. Then does regular news at 6pm. But after that it's opinion journalism. Just like MSNBC and CNN. Even CBC tends to do that now. True...I don't know why this simple concept escapes the self anointed "smart" people. Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.