Cancun sun speeds decay of global warming charade

[lukin]

Where can a guy get a job like waldo. Look at his post record for today:

11:40 p.m. Monday night

12:05 a.m. Tuesday morning

12:19

12:51

1:01

1:09

1:18

1:21

1:30

1:32

3:15

4:34

4:46 Bed time

10:55 The early bird catches the worm

11:11

11:18

12:01 P.M. Tuesday afternoon

12:12

12:16

1:26

1:34

1:43

1:51

2:35

2:48

3:12

3:23

3:25

......to be continued..... ad nauseam

With this kind of time and effort, we could all become pompous asses.

Edited December 7, 2010 by lukin

[waldo]

Anyways, I'm glad you admit to clean coal technology.

But I'll ask again, do you support clean coal technology? Or just when China's involved?

Does that mean you're a supporter of clean coal? Or just for China?

Waldo. Are you a supporter of clean coal?

Are you a supporter of clean coal?

Are you a supporter of clean coal?

pardon? Professor... I'm not clear on what you're asking?

[waldo]

Where can a guy get a job like waldo. Look at his post record for today:

11:40 p.m. Monday night

12:05 a.m. Tuesday morning

12:19

12:51

1:01

1:09

1:18

1:21

1:30

1:32

3:15

4:34

4:46 Bed time

10:55 The early bird catches the worm

11:11

11:18

12:01 P.M. Tuesday afternoon

12:12

12:16

1:26

1:34

1:43

1:51

2:35

2:48

3:12

3:23

3:25

......to be continued..... ad nauseam

With this kind of time and effort, we could all become pompous asses.

Stalker Alert!

[Shady]

pardon? Professor... I'm not clear on what you're asking?

I don't understand what the problem is. Why won't you let us know?

[lukin]

so I read today in Cancun China is willing to meet some sort reduction guideline,

Al Gore, Heather Mallick and Dave Suzuki's opinions don't matter, much like anyone else who writes for the Toronto Star

Talking is easy.............

What a useless post.

Edited December 7, 2010 by lukin

[jbg]

Stalker Alert!

I suspect you're a bit obsessed.

[lukin]

Stalker Alert!

I just thought I would take a minute so that everyone could see how truly homely you really are.

You know what waldo, i kinda feel sorry for you...a bit. Being married to a computer must be awesome,eh.

[lukin]

Stalker Alert!

WOW!!!! waldo...one minute after my post you strike back, one whole minute it took you to respond. You love your computer! You must just sit at your computer....vibrating.....waiting to make your next post.

[Shady]

WOW!!!! waldo...one minute after my post you strike back, one whole minute it took you to respond. You love your computer! You must just sit at your computer....vibrating.....waiting to make your next post.

You just know he sits there constantly hitting refresh!

[lukin]

Are you a supporter of clean coal?

Shady, I don't know if you've noticed or not, but waldo has a hard time answering the simplest of questions. I've asked him numerous times what he is doing on a personal level to save the planet. He can't answer that. I guess I stumped him. He can't answer your simple question because he has yet to find the answer in the internet. He is becoming the "convenient avoider".

[waldo]

Stalker Alert!

I just thought I would take a minute so that everyone could see how truly homely you really are.

You know what waldo, i kinda feel sorry for you...a bit. Being married to a computer must be awesome,eh.

lukin, no need to qualify your stalking... I trust TimG has also taken note of your practice and from the heart commentary; ... it was, after all, he & I that were having a somewhat localized posting tete-a-tete during your target fixation.

[waldo]

so I read today in Cancun China is willing to meet some sort reduction guideline, didn't have time to read the article completely but some people appear to think it's a breakthrough...a smart move politically if true, it puts all the pressure and responsibility on India and the US...

Al Gore, Heather Mallick and Dave Suzuki's opinions don't matter, much like anyone else who writes for the Toronto Star

Talking is easy.............

What a useless post.

it's somewhat disappointing you would criticize a MLW member over a simple, informative and relatively benign observation... your clairvoyant prowess is also recognized in being able to determine the member's unspecified source reference.

[Shady]

it's somewhat disappointing you would criticize a MLW member over a simple, informative and relatively benign observation... your clairvoyant prowess is also recognized in being able to determine the member's unspecified source reference.

Do you support clean coal?

[waldo]

Do you support clean coal?

why do you care and how will you utilize the information provided? I certainly don't give a shit what personal views you hold... are you that dazzled by my presence?

[Shady]

why do you care and how will you utilize the information provided? I certainly don't give a shit what personal views you hold... are you that dazzled by my presence?

LOL, I love watching alarmists squirm. Especially when they're boxed in, and not knowing what to do, and how to respond. It's classic!

Come'on Einstein, answer the question. Do you support clean coal?

[waldo]

yes, clearly you are dazzled by my mere presence - I've asked you a couple of questions... your choice to respond, or not.

[Shady]

yes, clearly you are dazzled by my mere presence - I've asked you a couple of questions... your choice to respond, or not.

Do you support clean coal? It's a yes or no answer.

[waldo]

Do you support clean coal? It's a yes or no answer.

yes, clearly you are dazzled by my mere presence - I've asked you a couple of questions... your choice to respond, or not.

your choice to respond, or not.

[Shady]

your choice to respond, or not.

Do you support clean coal?

[lukin]

it's somewhat disappointing you would criticize a MLW member over a simple, informative and relatively benign observation... your clairvoyant prowess is also recognized in being able to determine the member's unspecified source reference.

I have a feeling wyly and waldo are the same person, if not joined at the hip.

How is his (your) observation informative if it doesn't have a source? How does someone only read part of an article from an unknown source, then come on here claiming China is thinking about doing this or that? Did he(you) read this in a scientific journal? We'll see what China commits to doing. His(your) post was useless.

I'm definitely interested in hearing about what China is willing to do.

Waldo(wyly), why don't you move to the socialist paradise, China?

Have another stimulating night of sitting in front of your monitor wyly(waldo). It must be a real hoot.

Edited December 8, 2010 by lukin

[Shady]

I think you're absolutely right about Waldo and Wyly being the same person. It's pretty sad that Waldo needs an imaginary poster to pseudo-agree with him.

[jbg]

I think you're absolutely right about Waldo and Wyly being the same person. It's pretty sad that Waldo needs an imaginary poster to pseudo-agree with him.

Crickets from them him.

[wyly]

it's somewhat disappointing you would criticize a MLW member over a simple, informative and relatively benign observation... your clairvoyant prowess is also recognized in being able to determine the member's unspecified source reference.

my source-I only two read two papers the G & M and Calgary Herald and I'll only read the Herald if it's free (it's a crap rag) but it's the Herald where I read the article I mentioned today...

[wyly]

There is nothing new on the table:

Without binding targets on China and India with an effective enforcment mechanism there can be no deal.

China’s offer to make its existing, domestic pledge to slow growth in carbon emissions binding under a U.N. resolution is a compromise it hopes will encourage developed countries to continue the existing Kyoto Protocol.

“We can create a resolution and that resolution can be binding on China,” said Huang Huikang, the Chinese Foreign Ministry’s envoy for climate change talks.

“Under the (U.N. Climate) Convention, we can even have a legally binding decision. We can discuss the specific form. We can make our efforts a part of international efforts.”

Chinese negotiators are also saying they’re willing to agree to outside verification, which had been a sticking point at Copenhagen.

[TimG]

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE6B55H720101206

China’s offer to make its existing, domestic pledge to slow growth in carbon emissions binding under a U.N. resolution is a compromise it hopes will encourage developed countries to continue the existing Kyoto Protocol.

An interesting development. Of course, promises to only "slow" emission growth are still unacceptable because they would give China too much of a competitive advantage.

Frankly, I suspect this is nothing but a ploy by the Chinese since they know that the current political environment in the US makes any treaty a non-starter. In the unlikely event that their bluff is called they will change their tune pretty fast.

Edit: The US has weighed in:

Mr. Stern reacted coolly to a report that China is willing to include its voluntary emissions targets in a treaty and pass legislation to make them binding.

“That doesn’t seem to be anything new to me,” he said. “I would love it to be a game changer, but it looks to me like business as usual.”

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/americas/kyoto-impasse-could-torpedo-climate-talks-us-warns/article1829183/

Looks like my original assessment was correct.

Edited December 8, 2010 by TimG