Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

The Portland tribune tried for the year to break this story. They interviewed hotel employees, the "victim" who said she would not talk with out a million bucks, they even took an add out and tried to find anyone else who might have the same experience. In the end they concluded all this women wanted was a payday and was in fact lying. It is no national enquirer I know, it is a real paper they does not report on alien abductions but I think they covered the story quite well.

http://www.portlandtribune.com/opinion/story.php?story_id=127793339594194000

Edited by punked
  • Replies 249
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Police have released the audio of Gore's accuser!

AUDIO

Oh my God! Oh my God! Oh my God! Oh my God!!!!

Really Shady, do you REALLY care if this guys marriage breaks down? I certainly don't, it's his business, and his business alone.

"They muddy the water, to make it seem deep." - Friedrich Nietzsche

Posted

Oh my God! Oh my God! Oh my God! Oh my God!!!!

Really Shady, do you REALLY care if this guys marriage breaks down? I certainly don't, it's his business, and his business alone.

You and your ilk certainly care when Republicans are involved. So I gotta hold up the same standard. :)

Enjoy!

Posted

You and your ilk certainly care when Republicans are involved. So I gotta hold up the same standard. :)

Enjoy!

So Shady where is your thread on the Enquirer reporting on Sarah Palin's indiscretions if they are such a great journalist organization why didn't you post that one?

Posted

So Shady where is your thread on the Enquirer reporting on Sarah Palin's indiscretions if they are such a great journalist organization why didn't you post that one?

I don't link to the Enguirer, unless its backed up by other media sources, like associated press.

Posted

I don't link to the Enguirer, unless its backed up by other media sources, like associated press.

Accept when the AP says "The Enquirer is saying this...." which it is it isn't back up. You will see in MY link to an actual news paper that investigated this for a year they couldn't find a story. They tired and couldn't, the Enquirer just reported the story of a women real papers wouldn't then the papers reported what the Enquirer said. Sorry Shady your source is the enquirer.

Posted (edited)

Not really. More like the Police Department! :lol:

You mean the Police Department that decided not to press charges because the accuser failed to show up to three different interviews, and gave no evidence. That Police Department because I see mention of that in your post. Looks like your source is the Enquirer to me.

Edited by punked
Posted

You mean the Police Department that decided not to press charges because the accuser failed to show up to three different interviews, and gave no evidence. That Police Department because I see mention of that in your post. Looks like your source is the Enquirer to me.

Nope. The Police Department that re-opened the case because of new evidence. DNA evidence, hotel video, and audio. Let me guess. The Police Department involved are just undercover Enquirer reporters! :lol:

You guys don't like it much when Dems are held to the standards you hold Republicans to! It's very entertaining.

Posted

Nope. The Police Department that re-opened the case because of new evidence. DNA evidence, hotel video, and audio. Let me guess. The Police Department involved are just undercover Enquirer reporters! :lol:

You guys don't like it much when Dems are held to the standards you hold Republicans to! It's very entertaining.

4 year After the fact the police department re opens the case to clear Al Gores name. I know in Shady's America you are guilty till proven innocent. I expect to be the first one to post when they close this case again. Not Shady.

BTW Shady the Police department reopened the case and gave no reason why, where did you get the info of "DNA evidence, hotel video, and audio" was the enquirer because it was not the AP. They report no reason has been given. Shady and his sources for news tabloids. Where is that Palin Story Shady.

Posted

Me and my ilk would feel profoundly pathetic losers if we started a thread on Sarah Palin and her husband's marital troubles. Hold me to that standard, please. :lol:

"I think it's fun watching the waldick get all excited/knickers in a knot over something." -scribblet
Posted

Me and my ilk would feel profoundly pathetic losers if we started a thread on Sarah Palin and her husband's marital troubles. Hold me to that standard, please. :lol:

What if there was a Police investigation into those troubles? :lol:

Posted

What if there was a Police investigation into those troubles? :lol:

Aren't there continuous police investigations going on right now on Mrs. Palin, and wasn't her defense fund for those investigation found in violation of the law? Guilty until proven innocent only if you a Democrat in Shady's world.

The police should investigate every claim even if they are from people who have no evidence and refused over a 4 year period to talk to them, and will only talk to papers if they given them a million dollars. However only a crazy person would jump on those claims as fact unless the police actually find something.

Well I guess a person who gets their news from the enquirer is a little bit off their rocker though.

Posted

Where is that Palin Story Shady.

Not sure. But you certainly have had your share of Palin comments.

Does somebody have something on Palin?

I want to know why she is resigning. She didn't say anything about it. Maybe there is an indictment coming or she maybe she was hiking.

Are you referring to when Sarah was pregnant for 8 months and hid it from the public?

Those are certainly top-notch punked moments in journalism! :lol:

Guest American Woman
Posted

Nope. The Police Department that re-opened the case because of new evidence. DNA evidence, hotel video, and audio.

Where are you getting that from? :blink:

Portland police did not say why it was reopening the investigation in its brief statement Wednesday. link

Posted

Where are you getting that from? :blink:

Portland police did not say why it was reopening the investigation in its brief statement Wednesday. link

Perhaps Shady has mistaken the woman's claims for the police investigation. Somehow. :)

As scarce as truth is, the supply has always been in excess of the demand.

--Josh Billings

Posted

So the police actually talked about why they opened he case again. Got that Shady the police not facts you just make up out of thin air.

They say they are opening it because when they closed it the first time did not have the authority to do so. There is still however no evidence, the witness still just wants money and the police wont find anything.

http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/07/portland_police_chief_procedural_issues_with_origi.php#more

Posted

So do you think Al cheated on his wife? Second, is this accuser making the whole thing up? She seems to have pretty descriptive incidents for someone to be making it up.

Guest American Woman
Posted (edited)
She seems to have pretty descriptive incidents for someone to be making it up.

I read about "pretty descriptive incidents" in fiction all the time. People are perfectly capable of making such incidents up, or applying something that may have happened in their lives to someone else.

Edited by American Woman
Posted

Remember kids....if Al Gore did have sex outside of his marriage, that means global warming isn't true!

Anybody who believers exponential growth can go on forever in a finite world is either a madman or an economist.

-- Kenneth Boulding,

1973

Guest American Woman
Posted

Remember kids....if Al Gore did have sex outside of his marriage, that means global warming isn't true!

Well, of course it does. Everybody knows that!

Posted

Something seems fishy here to me.

I have no problem at all believing that ANY politician could be guilty of charges like this, and no real opinion on whether Mr Gore is being falsely accused or not.

What I find odd though is that the police would release transcripts of interviews with the accusor to the press. Seems like the normal thing would be to use them in COURT...

I think at this point a reasonable mind has to assume that this is a deliberate smear campaign by the police... whether or not the charges have merit.

I question things because I am human. And call no one my father who's no closer than a stranger

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,017
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    taylor66
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...