punked Posted July 16, 2010 Report Posted July 16, 2010 Wow. So you mean a liberal journalism award that's regularly given to liberal news media, gave an award to a liberal blog. Gee, I'm shocked. Isn't it O'Reilly who regularly cites the polk he won as proof that he is a journalist Shady? BTW he never actually won that, it was lie but he cites it none the less right? It doesn't matter though because if you actually read the article you would see they cite several news sources they got their info from. You didn't though because it isn't a hit and run on a Democrat so you don't care. Quote
bloodyminded Posted July 16, 2010 Report Posted July 16, 2010 Isn't it O'Reilly who regularly cites the polk he won as proof that he is a journalist Shady? Yes, until he was called out on it, after which he wisely dropped his bragging rights. He also cited the "Paris Business Review" in a debate about how his boycott of France (for not demurring to Washington's demands) had been very effective in damaging their economy. Except the publication doesn't exist. Some people simply...lie! It's brazen, but not uncommon. Quote As scarce as truth is, the supply has always been in excess of the demand. --Josh Billings
Shady Posted July 16, 2010 Author Report Posted July 16, 2010 Isn't it O'Reilly who regularly cites the polk he won as proof that he is a journalist Shady? I don't know. I've never heard him mention that before. Let alone regularly. Quote
sharkman Posted July 17, 2010 Report Posted July 17, 2010 Isn't it O'Reilly who regularly cites the polk he won as proof that he is a journalist Shady? Seriously, how would you know what exactly O'Reilly says since you don't watch him? So that means you get your info from leftwing hit pieces and outlets that aren't critical of a single thing Obama does. Not that there's anything wrong with that. But anyway, the fact that O'Reilly trounces all other news commentary shows means nothing I guess. Quote
punked Posted July 17, 2010 Report Posted July 17, 2010 Seriously, how would you know what exactly O'Reilly says since you don't watch him? So that means you get your info from leftwing hit pieces and outlets that aren't critical of a single thing Obama does. Not that there's anything wrong with that. But anyway, the fact that O'Reilly trounces all other news commentary shows means nothing I guess. Yeah you are right those left wing blogs have nothing on the National Enquirer where this story is from. I know you and your alien abduction stories and all. The right wing and their UFOs while the left wing deals with issues like health care and economy. Quote
sharkman Posted July 17, 2010 Report Posted July 17, 2010 After all this time the left won't report that Al Gore is divorcing his wife. I'm not surprised. They also have little to say that the Obama admin is barring reporters from certain zones around the oil spill. They self censor themselves rather than report on Obama's obsession with golf and vacations although they covered Bush's(Obama wins in both categories, hands down). It's just too easy to pick them off anymore, they've stopped trying. Quote
punked Posted July 17, 2010 Report Posted July 17, 2010 After all this time the left won't report that Al Gore is divorcing his wife. I'm not surprised. They also have little to say that the Obama admin is barring reporters from certain zones around the oil spill. They self censor themselves rather than report on Obama's obsession with golf and vacations although they covered Bush's(Obama wins in both categories, hands down). It's just too easy to pick them off anymore, they've stopped trying. Do you mean they wont report or that they don't think it should be on the front page the same time when there are two wars going on and oil is gushing into the gulf. It isn't the lefts fault they think that news is news while the right focuses on gossip. Quote
BubberMiley Posted July 17, 2010 Report Posted July 17, 2010 Actually, as I recall, Inside Edition won a Polk award for reporting done after O'Reilly left (I'll do it live!). O'Reilly bragged and took credit for it on his Fox show, and claimed it was a Peabody. Quote "I think it's fun watching the waldick get all excited/knickers in a knot over something." -scribblet
bloodyminded Posted July 17, 2010 Report Posted July 17, 2010 Actually, as I recall, Inside Edition won a Polk award for reporting done after O'Reilly left (I'll do it live!). O'Reilly bragged and took credit for it on his Fox show, and claimed it was a Peabody. So he took credit for the wrong award, not even having won the fabricated one..... No one can accuse him of being tentative or too cautious, anyway. On a related note, I attended Emmy night, and after I had left, I won an Oscar from them. Quote As scarce as truth is, the supply has always been in excess of the demand. --Josh Billings
Guest American Woman Posted July 31, 2010 Report Posted July 31, 2010 Al Gore even creepier than I imagined! QuoteJUNE 24--In a bizarre statement to police, the Oregon woman who claims that Al Gore fondled and groped her during a massage session described the former Vice President as a giggling "crazed sex poodle" who gave a "come hither" look before pouncing on her in a Portland hotel suite. In a taped January 2009 interview with cops, the 54-year-old woman, a licensed masseuse whose name has been redacted from police records, read from a lengthy prepared statement that detailed her alleged October 2006 encounter with Gore at the Hotel Lucia. .... I'm sure you'd love to know how the investigation ended, Shady. But way to judge him as "creepy" before the investigation was completed. Al Gore won't face prosecution in sexual assault allegation: Former Vice President Al Gore will not face prosecution on an allegation of sexual assault from 2006. The allegation, brought forth by Molly Hagerty, claims Gore sexually abused her during a professional massage at the Hotel Lucia in Portland, Oregon, on October 24, 2006. The Portland Police Bureau did not recommend prosecution "due to a lack of credible evidence," according to the Multnomah County district attorney's office. "After evaluating the materials submitted by PPB I have concluded that I agree with the assessment that a sustainable criminal case does not exist," Senior Deputy District Attorney Don Rees wrote in a memo Friday. "Ms. Hagerty's detailed statement ... is insufficient to support a criminal charge given other contradictory evidence, conflicting witness statements, credibility issues, lack of forensic evidence and denials by Mr. Gore." Quote
Shady Posted July 31, 2010 Author Report Posted July 31, 2010 Good post American Woman. Looks like Al Gore is innocent. Or at least there isn't enough evidence to proceed with any charges. Quote
Smallc Posted July 31, 2010 Report Posted July 31, 2010 (edited) Good post American Woman. Looks like Al Gore is innocent. That was very big of you to admit. Or at least there isn't enough evidence to proceed with any charges. Oh, I see what you did there..... Edited July 31, 2010 by Smallc Quote
punked Posted July 31, 2010 Report Posted July 31, 2010 I was interested to find out that the DA NOT only found Al Gore did no wrong but also came to the conclusion that "It appears Ms. Hagerty was paid by the National Enquirer for her story". This another thing where PUNKED was RIGHT and SHADY was wrong, where Shady read something on a right wing blog and it was a lie and punked read something on a left wing blog and it was right. SO Right wing blogs=lies. Quote
Shady Posted July 31, 2010 Author Report Posted July 31, 2010 I was interested to find out that the DA NOT only found Al Gore did no wrong but also came to the conclusion that "It appears Ms. Hagerty was paid by the National Enquirer for her story". This another thing where PUNKED was RIGHT and SHADY was wrong, where Shady read something on a right wing blog and it was a lie and punked read something on a left wing blog and it was right. SO Right wing blogs=lies. Sorry punked, but The Oregonian is a newspaper, not a right-wing blog. Quote
punked Posted July 31, 2010 Report Posted July 31, 2010 Sorry punked, but The Oregonian is a newspaper, not a right-wing blog. So it is media source which isn't even as good or honest as the left wing blogs? Good to know the left wing blogs are a better source. Quote
Shady Posted July 31, 2010 Author Report Posted July 31, 2010 So it is media source which isn't even as good or honest as the left wing blogs? Good to know the left wing blogs are a better source. Yeah, they're a great source. I especially liked it when they reported Karl Rove was indicted by Fitzgerald! Merry Fitzmas! Quote
punked Posted July 31, 2010 Report Posted July 31, 2010 Yeah, they're a great source. I especially liked it when they reported Karl Rove was indicted by Fitzgerald! Merry Fitzmas! Talking points memo never reported that Shady. ANOTHER LIE better walk it back. Quote
Shady Posted August 1, 2010 Author Report Posted August 1, 2010 Talking points memo never reported that Shady. Left-wing blogs did. Quote
punked Posted August 1, 2010 Report Posted August 1, 2010 Left-wing blogs did. Proof! Remember it has to be a blog I have cited in this forum. Quote
Shady Posted August 1, 2010 Author Report Posted August 1, 2010 Proof! Remember it has to be a blog I have cited in this forum. Why is that? You made a generalized comment that righ-wing blogs aren't as good of sources as left-wing blogs. So I cite an example of a false left-wing blog dominated story, and now you say it has to be a blog you've used. Discussing anything with you is a shell game. It always has been. Quote
punked Posted August 1, 2010 Report Posted August 1, 2010 Why is that? You made a generalized comment that righ-wing blogs aren't as good of sources as left-wing blogs. So I cite an example of a false left-wing blog dominated story, and now you say it has to be a blog you've used. Discussing anything with you is a shell game. It always has been. That is right because the right wing Blogs you use, Breitbart, are liars and we have shown that. Now you show the left wing blogs I use which got this story correct, the Breitbart story correct, and the other lies you have told correct and we see my sources are BETTER then yours which are mostly out of your head. Quote
Shady Posted August 1, 2010 Author Report Posted August 1, 2010 That is right because the right wing Blogs you use, Breitbart, are liars and we have shown that. I rarely post from blogs. Nice try. Now you show the left wing blogs I use which got this story correct, the Breitbart story correct, and the other lies you have told correct and we see my sources are BETTER then yours which are mostly out of your head. Well, we know for a fact that DailyKos was all over the Karl Rove to be indict story. And we all know you use the DailyKos, well, daily! Once again, nice try. Quote
BubberMiley Posted August 2, 2010 Report Posted August 2, 2010 I rarely post from blogs. Quote "I think it's fun watching the waldick get all excited/knickers in a knot over something." -scribblet
Oleg Bach Posted August 8, 2010 Report Posted August 8, 2010 I can see the big oaf on the message table --- grabing her by the head and saying "you know what to do" ..."I'm Al Gore bitch" ----------------what a horrible image...even a homo would not want to give Gore head --------he's a disgusting freaky frinking man..I mean his skin looks like it is made from plastic...I guess the fact that he expects the world to get down on him is just another "inconvenient truth" ....................... The guy has no class - and as for his global warming...I don't see him lobbying against big oil...in fact he loves Lear jets and adores big oil and likes being a big shot.....gross. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.