myata Posted June 18, 2010 Report Share Posted June 18, 2010 (edited) I admire this great Russian wisdom: Pig not in the least because it's so illustrative of how things are with many of us in life (and on this board too). So why does a pig always find mud to roll in? Maybe because it's the only thing it looks for? The only thing it knows? Edited June 18, 2010 by myata Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sharkman Posted June 18, 2010 Report Share Posted June 18, 2010 Yes, and why does a dog always return to its vomit, hmmm? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GostHacked Posted June 18, 2010 Report Share Posted June 18, 2010 Your one sided response is why I would not waste my time. Borg I wasted my time responding to this time waster's response on something he did not want to waste time on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
myata Posted June 18, 2010 Report Share Posted June 18, 2010 Yes, and why does a dog always return to its vomit, hmmm? Thanks, didn't know that one, but you see, it actually works for both sides! To each, their own only with somewhat limited menu. But that's what we like so no complaints, right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sharkman Posted June 18, 2010 Report Share Posted June 18, 2010 I'm not sure that "that's what we like". One lays in it and the other eats its own vomit, again and again. But whatever turns your crank, I guess. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
myata Posted June 18, 2010 Report Share Posted June 18, 2010 I'm not sure that "that's what we like". One lays in it and the other eats its own vomit, again and again. But whatever turns your crank, I guess. Ditto. Whatever turns it, as long as we're content being cranked up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbg Posted June 18, 2010 Report Share Posted June 18, 2010 Ditto. Whatever turns it, as long as we're content being cranked up. I know that Israel's atrocities upset you and NaomiGlover. This should upset you more (link). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
myata Posted June 19, 2010 Report Share Posted June 19, 2010 (edited) I know that Israel's atrocities upset you and NaomiGlover. This should upset you more (link). It does upset me, just as it doesn't negate or diminish Israeli or any other atrocities. And of course unlike these volatile and unpredictable events, Israeli land policies are authorised and advocated by its very government. Edited June 19, 2010 by myata Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Posted June 19, 2010 Report Share Posted June 19, 2010 It does upset me, just as it doesn't negate or diminish Israeli or any other atrocities. And of course unlike these volatile and unpredictable events, Israeli land policies are authorised and advocated by its very government. Moral equivalence in action. Jews building homes for themselves is seen as an equivalent hostile act to the Arabs that blow them up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
myata Posted June 19, 2010 Report Share Posted June 19, 2010 (edited) Moral equivalence [Objectivity -m] in action. Jews building homes for themselves on stolen land is seen as an equivalent hostile act [as well as -m] to the Arabs that blow them up. plus, of course that Arabs have no exclusive prerogative on blowing up homes. Now, it more or less makes sense, enjoy! Edited June 19, 2010 by myata Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Posted June 19, 2010 Report Share Posted June 19, 2010 on stolen land Says you. plus, of course that Arabs have no exclusive prerogative on blowing up homes.Now, it more less makes sense, enjoy! Indeed, you support the terrorists. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
myata Posted June 19, 2010 Report Share Posted June 19, 2010 Indeed, you support the terrorists. If you call "terrorists" people who blow up homes, then you certainly support them. No, I don't. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbg Posted June 19, 2010 Report Share Posted June 19, 2010 It does upset me, just as it doesn't negate or diminish Israeli or any other atrocities. And of course unlike these volatile and unpredictable events, Israeli land policies are authorised and advocated by its very government. The scale of these other atrocities is so much greater than the collateral damage on Israel's attack on the ship of fools peace faux-tilla. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wild Bill Posted June 19, 2010 Report Share Posted June 19, 2010 You are babbling Bob. You want everyone to believe that Amnesty International, Red Cross, HRW, UNHCR are all lying and there is no problem in Gaza. No one believes you Bob. Not even yourself. Well, I believe him! Certainly, more than I believe you! I can understand why you won't believe me, however. I've been following your posts for some months now and it's obvious that you don't accept that people can have different beliefs. In virtually every post where someone has expressed a different belief than yours about an issue you have flat out declared that they are lying! This is a very interesting philosophy to hold. It presupposes that you must be absolutely right in what you believe. It defines anyone who disagrees with you as dishonest. It certainly explains your incredible lack of courtesy and manners! Now you tell Bob that no one believes him. Who made you the spokesperson for everyone? I don't recall you ever asking me for my opinion. I do recall that when I expressed a belief in a thread you promptly called me a liar! You might want to google up "Dale Carnegie". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oleg Bach Posted June 19, 2010 Report Share Posted June 19, 2010 Hamas are ambitious cut throat opportunist - their Israeli counter parts are the same. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
myata Posted June 19, 2010 Report Share Posted June 19, 2010 The scale of these other atrocities is so much greater than the collateral damage on Israel's attack on the ship of fools peace faux-tilla. It may be in one isolated episode, but one should also keep in mind the long term picture. UN reacted to Kyrgiz events just as it should keep reacting to the events in Israel and Palestine from objective and factual position. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbg Posted June 21, 2010 Report Share Posted June 21, 2010 It may be in one isolated episode, but one should also keep in mind the long term picture. UN reacted to Kyrgiz events just as it should keep reacting to the events in Israel and Palestine from objective and factual position. But where are the reams of print? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.