Jump to content

The old double standards still alive and well


Argus

Recommended Posts

The National Capital Commision is a much unloved federal insitution which controls a lot of the land around Ottawa, and its board is made up of political appointees - flacks and hacks of no particular talent or skill. It seems some emigres from Communist countries want to put up a memorial to the victims of Communism, but the NCC is quite worried about it offending Communists and Marxists, and wants them to take the name "communist" out of it.

Ottawa Memorial Might Offend Communists

Can anyone imagine a similar sitution where someone wanted to put up a memorial to the victims of Nazis, and the wackos on a federal board worried that it might offend local Nazis and skinheads?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 207
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Can anyone imagine a similar sitution where someone wanted to put up a memorial to the victims of Nazis, and the wackos on a federal board worried that it might offend local Nazis and skinheads?

That's not the same thing at all.

Can you imagine them putting up a memories to the 'victims of totalitarian fascism' ? Why would they qualify that ?

The difference is that communists consider the totalitarian strain of communism to be a mutation of communism. Fascism doesn't have a democratic version so it's not the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's not the same thing at all.

Can you imagine them putting up a memories to the 'victims of totalitarian fascism' ? Why would they qualify that ?

The difference is that communists consider the totalitarian strain of communism to be a mutation of communism. Fascism doesn't have a democratic version so it's not the same.

I'm inclined to diagree given that the democratic strain of communism exists only in fantasyland while the victims of communism are in the tens of millions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm inclined to diagree given that the democratic strain of communism exists only in fantasyland while the victims of communism are in the tens of millions.

I think Michael was getting at the idea that we erect monuments to specific events, not to general ideas. (how about a monument to remember the victims of meanness?)

Edmonton has a memorial to the millions who starved to death in Ukraine because of Stalin.

-k

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If communists want to be offended let them be offended. Their ideas have brought grief enough to the world. More by far than even the Nazis. None can even count the tens of millions that died under Stalin and Mao and the others. Of all human philosophies, communism is the one most deserving of a monument to its folly, that the only thing one can become if one embraces communism is a victim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If communists want to be offended let them be offended. Their ideas have brought grief enough to the world. More by far than even the Nazis. None can even count the tens of millions that died under Stalin and Mao and the others. Of all human philosophies, communism is the one most deserving of a monument to its folly, that the only thing one can become if one embraces communism is a victim.

Well said! We know Stalin murdered 20 million ,we will never know how many Mao murdered. Adolph and his mad of nut bars were choir boys in comparison to this gruesome twosome of communism.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If communists want to be offended let them be offended. Their ideas have brought grief enough to the world. More by far than even the Nazis.

See, this is what I'm talking about. If we put up a memorial then folks like Bonam will draw the wrong conclusion. Another analogy - It's somewhat akin to putting up a memorial to the 'misdeeds of the west' and lumping us in with any G7 government since who knows when.

This line of thought is something today's leftists enjoy engaging in, and it's only a fit distraction for people like us who ignore arguing about nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well said! We know Stalin murdered 20 million ,we will never know how many Mao murdered. Adolph and his mad of nut bars were choir boys in comparison to this gruesome twosome of communism.

Hmmm, last time I looked at the thread on Afghanistan and Oil, Stalin and another freind of ours, Winston Churchill are being fingered as the one's that installed the dictators in Iran that finally culminated in things like Islamic extremism and 9/11...apparently this was all the result of trying to keep Hitler from grabbing all the oil.

Fascinating.

Everyday around here serves up some new fresh wrinkle to things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's not the same thing at all.

Can you imagine them putting up a memories to the 'victims of totalitarian fascism' ? Why would they qualify that ?

The difference is that communists consider the totalitarian strain of communism to be a mutation of communism. Fascism doesn't have a democratic version so it's not the same.

Whatever the Communists consider, there is no democratic communist state and never has been. Communists don't "like elections once they're in power. Also, the point is no one would object to a statue commemorating the victims of "totalitarian facism" but the NCC doesn'te even want the word Communism on the memorial, even if it does say "totalitarian" .

Another point. No one would care if Fascists were offended by a memorial. In fact, most people would probably think that a bonus. But here we are concerned that Communists might be offended. Why? Why do some people disdain Fascists but respect Communists?

Edited by Argus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like I say - there are democratic communists in our midst but are there democratic fascists ?

Communism will be coming back some day, so let's save ourselves the effort of having to rework these monuments in future...

Can you name that democratic communist regime?

How about a monument to the victims of communist regimes then?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can you name that democratic communist regime?

How about a monument to the victims of communist regimes then?

Mo,

Not sure what you mean... How about a monument to the victims of Pol Pot, or the victims of the Soviet Union ?

Or we could drop this whole discussion in the real world and leave it here on MLW.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mo,

Not sure what you mean... How about a monument to the victims of Pol Pot, or the victims of the Soviet Union ?

Or we could drop this whole discussion in the real world and leave it here on MLW.

A monument to the victims of communism need be collective....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest TrueMetis
If communists want to be offended let them be offended. Their ideas have brought grief enough to the world. More by far than even the Nazis. None can even count the tens of millions that died under Stalin and Mao and the others. Of all human philosophies, communism is the one most deserving of a monument to its folly, that the only thing one can become if one embraces communism is a victim.

If the Nazis had won they probably would have killed way more people than the Soviets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's not the same thing at all.

Can you imagine them putting up a memories to the 'victims of totalitarian fascism' ? Why would they qualify that ?

The difference is that communists consider the totalitarian strain of communism to be a mutation of communism. Fascism doesn't have a democratic version so it's not the same.

Yes of course, communism (being a conspiracy, not a political ideology) can never be carried out, which is why the venal communists of today all repudiate Stalinism as some how "not really communism"...

Communism is as versatile as evil itself: it is all things to all men... communism preached independence and racially homogeneous societies to the blacks of Africa in the 60's 70's and 80's.... while simultaneously preaching INTERDEPENDENCE and "bortherhood" to the idiots and suckers in the US and Canada.

Communism (be it maoist, stalinist, Pol potist, cuban etc) leads to but one end: misery and death. It is an "ideology" of anti-humans. Communism comes from the primeval abyss of savagery and ignorance, far from being the "futuristic" ideology it claims to be , communism is the most primitive of human society craft... our ancestors homo-habilis and homo erectus where communists (ie lived in communes without such notions as private property or currency and in the state of indiscriminate equality)

Hierarchy and division of labor is a faculty of civilized society.

Also both varieties of fascism in Europe were DEMOCRATICALLY ELECTED... that cannot be said of communism.

and to number the total victims of communism at a conservative glance is roughly 119 million (RJ Rummel) people in this century alone. Far far beyond anything fascists ever did (most of fascism's victims after all were mere communists)

Edited by lictor616
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...