Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 202
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

http://www.presstv.com/detail.aspx?id=8678...ionid=351020104

In a direct reference to a possible military option, Barak urged Washington to consider "alternatives other than tougher sanctions" as a means to prevent a breakthrough in Iran's uranium enrichment.

"We believe the continuation of the Iranian atomic project is a potential danger for the existence of the state of Israel. Our position is clear. Sanctions are necessary but Israel does not rule out any option and suggests other countries do the same," Barak said Wednesday, AFP reported.

http://www.presstv.com/detail.aspx?id=8566...ionid=351020101

"Israel fears US-Iran talks may lead to rapprochement between the two countries -- a development that may be able to slightly change the balance of power in the Middle East. "

That's what I have been saying here all along. Iran's nuclear program is not a danger to UK, Canada or US for that matter. It's for Israel losing its nuclear monopoly status in the ME. Israel with all the hypes about their air superiority alone is not capable to destroy all the undeground facilities in Iran which is why they are trying the iranian nuclear issue an international issue and engage other countries.

Posted

let me help out dancer, DoP and the few others with their response; holocaust, terrorists, allah, suicide, drive into the sea, holocaust, anti-semite, terrorists

Posted
Iranian media. The comment sections are choice.

Big ad for George Galloway on the front page. He's always good for a laugh.

-----------------

Sigh...

It would probably be safe to say that Iran already has a nuke or two. Russia just after the soviet fall...was selling them...Iran has oil revenue...Ivan has a nuke. I really don't think that Israel is doing all the war lobbying on it's own...sounds like the Obama administration is still in the bomba buisness.

Posted
Iranian media. The comment sections are choice.

Big ad for George Galloway on the front page. He's always good for a laugh.

you seem to have a problem with anything iranian or arab.

the web site is actually not bad.

how are the comments any different than the ones you see on ynet or jpost?

how is george galloway a good laugh? does hearing some honesty from a politician make you laugh nervously?

Posted
how is george galloway a good laugh? does hearing some honesty from a politician make you laugh nervously?

I find it hard to read Galloway and honest in the same line.

The man was in the payroll of the Pakistani gov't who paid his company wellover $1 million US. Apprently all legal of course. Then there is his wife and her payment from foreign entities...

RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS

If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us

Posted
Trying to keep these two from going to war...i think 2009 might be a bad year all the way around!

Wars are not known for US convenience, except for maybe Serbia and Iraq. As to your question, Obama will support Israel for the most part, as will France and the UK. Iran is the bad guy, whether it likes it or not.

What will PM Harper do? After all, Canada sells itself as a honest broker and makem' smoke peace pipe, right?

Ottawa better get on it right away! :lol:

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted
you seem to have a problem with anything iranian or arab.

the web site is actually not bad.

how are the comments any different than the ones you see on ynet or jpost?

how is george galloway a good laugh? does hearing some honesty from a politician make you laugh nervously?

Media from a country with no freedom of press/speech is laughable at best.

How do you know if a website is "bad" or "good"? Spidey-sense?

Watch any of George's rants...they're usually side-splitters.

I like it when the veins on his temples throb in time with his diatribes about the Jews Zionists.

-------------------------------

I feel like everyone else in this country today. I am utterly devastated.

---Tony Blair: July 2005

Posted (edited)
Media from a country with no freedom of press/speech is laughable at best.

How do you know if a website is "bad" or "good"? Spidey-sense?

Watch any of George's rants...they're usually side-splitters.

I like it when the veins on his temples throb in time with his diatribes about the Jews Zionists.

i like galloway's angry rants.

he's right, most of the zionists are pretty shitty crappy people. they'll walk over anyone or anything for their own selfish gain. it's too bad that some people can't distinguish zionists from jews. i have a lot of jewish friends who absolutely loathe zionism the way i do.

how do i know the website is good or bad? i look at the content of course. ALL of the articles i saw on the web site come from other sources. so it's another news site with a collection of articles from other sources. what makes it a decent site is that they share a good number of articles in a decently organized matter. i don't think presstv is based in iran, but i could be wrong.

Edited by dub
Posted
Wars are not known for US convenience, except for maybe Serbia and Iraq. As to your question, Obama will support Israel for the most part, as will France and the UK. Iran is the bad guy, whether it likes it or not.

What will PM Harper do? After all, Canada sells itself as a honest broker and makem' smoke peace pipe, right?

Ottawa better get on it right away! :lol:

speaking the truth.

Posted
Yeeha! Ladies and gentelmen and here's your WWE tack team Dancing Queen and Doggie Pooh! Give me five! :lol::P

We've been known to disagree...but are civilized enough to do it over a beer.

-------------------------------

You can learn many things from children. How much patience you have, for instance.

---Franklin P. Jones

Posted
Shows what you think and know are two different things.

http://www.presstv.ir/

(note .ir)

the original link had presstv.com. this is why i mentioned that 'i could be wrong'.

after looking into the site, the web site is located in iran and it should be looked at with suspicion due to iran's media censorship and control.

Posted
We've been known to disagree...but are civilized enough to do it over a beer.

all i see are high fives and piggy backs.

what exactly do you two disagree about when it comes to israel and the occupation?

Posted (edited)
all i see are high fives and piggy backs.

what exactly do you two disagree about when it comes to israel and the occupation?

All i see is alot of anti Israel comments..............personally i hope Israel blows Iran off the planet if they so much as blink the wrong way! Only a absolute moron would think Iran is using Nuclear power for peaceful gains.....lol

.......that is like letting a known psychopath own guns and trust that he won't hurt anybody because he said so........Iran is a nation full of fanatics who can't wait to die for Allah and have their 72 virgins or whatever it is they think they will get...so Israel not only has a right to defend itself it is their duty especially when Iran's leader threatens openly to wipe Israel off the planet, I think Israel is more than justified for a preemptive first strike!

Edited by wulf42
Posted
All i see is alot of anti Israel comments..............personally i hope Israel blows Iran off the planet if they so much as blink the wrong way!

you're much better than dancer and DoP. you're more honest about your inner feelings.

Only a absolute moron would think Iran is using Nuclear power for peaceful gains.....lol

they'd probably use it the same way israel has.

.......that is like letting a known psychopath own guns and trust that he won't hurt anybody because he said so........

how is iran a psychopath? when is the last time they attacked another nation? it's been centuries. whereas israel doesn't know how to keep its fingers off the trigger. you're a little off when picking who the psychopath is.

Iran is a nation full of fanatics would can't wait to die for Allah and have their 72 virgins or whatever it is they think they will get...

really?

so Israel not only has a right to defend itself it is their duty especially when Iran's leader threatens openly to wipe Israel off the planet, I think Israel is more than justified for a preemptive first strike!

so is iran or any other nation have a right to attack israel as self defense? because israeli officials, quite regularly, talk about attacking iran.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,896
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    postuploader
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Politics1990 earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Akalupenn earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • User earned a badge
      One Year In
    • josej earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • josej earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...