dub

the IDF has responded to several specific accusations of targeting buildings where no militants were present by saying there were militants present. amnesty has done a thorough investigation in many of these incidents and they've come to the conclusion that there were no militants present. so i'm only repeating what the IDF has said, so yes, i'm speaking on behalf of the IDF, where you're making shit up and making excuses without having a clue what you're trying to defend. i base my comments on the report and specific incidents. you base your comments on justifying israeli actions by any means possible and without having any knowledge of any of the incidents and without having read any of the report. all you're really doing is babbling nonsense. this is the reason your ass is being kicked.

bonam, you are lowering yourself to dancer's level by making comments like that. all i have done is post information from investigations from human rights organizations. i offer these investigations and reports and dancer offers his worthless opinion.

so now you're speaking on behalf of the IDF? in many of the instances, IDF had said there were militants in the buildings, but the investigations of most of the incidents have proven that there weren't. but i'm sure the IDF is glad that you're so quick to jump in there to give excuses. yes. the 300+ children are all dangerous. a woman walking out of a building waving a white flag is definitely dangerous. i'm sure, even you don't believe your own bs. thanx for the babbling and pasting an article that doesn't relate to this matter. ass kicked. babbling again. ass kicked.

thank you for the prompt reply. - when there is a hamas member in an empty building, shooting at the IDF, it doesn't give israel the right to shoot a missile at a residential building with occupants that is 2 streets over. when israel does that, they violate international law. - when a woman with children behind her walk out of a building, waving a white flag, and they get shot at by soldiers, they're violating international law. - when a group of civilians are forcibly held in their own home by IDF soldiers, and then the soldiers begin shooting from the home, thus, use them as human shields, that's a violation of international law. - when IDF soldiers force civilians to go into buildings to check for booby traps or to tell hamas fighters to stop shooting, that's a violation of international law. for many, these are simple to understand and accept, but for you, i'm sure it will take a bit of time to ponder and perhaps even understand. i just kicked your ass again. now it's time for you to respond with more of your bs.

lols. you're not really expecting people to be as simple as you, do you? pasting an article from the geneva convention does not win you arguments or proof any points. you have to see whether and how the article applies to different incidents. this is why these investigations are important and in many incidents during the gaza war the investigations and evidence have shown that israel violated international law. ps - fat fingers? "repeation"?

this is a threat: I will ask you kindly to remove it pronto. I will give you by the end of the day. please go ahead and report whatever you're going to report. i just hope we can still be friends after all of this.

get back to me when you've done your own investigation to prove that all of these human rights organizations' investigations and conclusions about israeli war crimes are wrong.

even though your "threat" and "the talking to" was cute, i didn't remove it. it was flagged (probably by the hallway monitor, dancer) and removed. regardless, stop being so sensitive. the only similarities was the nickname "Gosthacked", which is not your real name. my point was well-received, i'm sure; an ad on craigslist is easy to post and using it to draw a conclusion like Riverwind and Gosthacked have is foolish.

go and report me. your hallway monitor personality prevents you from seeing that this was an example to show how easy it is to post an ad on craigslist and anything can be posted on there. have you got around to reporting me to the copyright folks because i forgot to put quotes around a paragraph? are you ever a sad case.

it might be a challenge for you, but it took me less than a minute to post that.

you're making excuses bonam. israel's border has been defined and recognized internationally. the rest is just a bunch of mumble jumble.

you're typing misinformation again. i have condemned hamas' rocket attacks. you, on the other hand, have condoned israel's war crimes. ps - what is demonstrateble? are you getting angry and punching the keyboard again?

that's weird. look what i saw on craigslist. it must be true: http://ottawa.en.craigslist.ca/cas/1341717543.html

israel has already been given a border.

erroneous according to your worthless opinion. anyone who is not trying to apologize for war crimes cares about HRW's report and conclusion.

you're babbling just like a mouthpiece would. you lie just like the IDF does. - first, israel denied using white phosphorous and of course you jump on the bandwagon - then, israel says it used it legally and within the laws of the GC when the evidence of its use became overwhelming - then, israel's PR puts out a bogus statement, and floods press releases saying that the red cross has said its use was not illegal. of course, you were one of the first to jump in this. - then, the red cross puts out a statement saying that it did no such thing. - after an investigation by HRW, the conclusion was that israel used white phosphorous illegally.

Israel suffers 13th swine flu death August 24, 2009 JERUSALEM (JTA) -- An Israeli woman became the country's 13th swine flu fatality. sounds like there needs to be another call to the flying rabbis.

instead of quoting from the article, show me, in the actual report, where HRW has accused hamas of using people as human shield. after that, show me all the evidence from the report where it's been concluded that israel has used people as human shield. your foot is in your mouth. where is the evidence of this? are you going to post another video from youtube from years ago as your evidence? the way it is used can be illegal and that's what the evidence suggests. you keep missing this simple point but i'll continue to shove it down your quivering throat. of course they're not going to go on record while they're serving. plenty of former IDF members have gone on record to speak against the illegal actions by IDF. you seem to have the attention span is worse than a guppy's. there is a 100+ report from amnesty international outlining the evidence. same shit. kemp did not go to gaza and did not do an investigation like the human rights organizations have. the same organizations who have concluded that israel has committed war crimes.

you're posting misinformation. as a whole, the jews have not been the victims in the middle east. the jews have been the aggressors. i mean, you can babble all you want, but look at the situation today. who has the state? who has the guns? who is racking up the kill points? who is gaining land illegally? what the europeans did to the jews is no fault of the palestinians.

what's the point? only if we kill people then it's illegal? taking away their land and keeping them in an open air prison is A-OKAY? consult with international law. the very same law that created the state israel 60 years ago.

what's the point you're trying to make here, papa bear?

to me, it sounds like you're making excuses. have you seen the settlements in the west bank? don't make excuses please. enough people here make excuses. the settlements are not there for self-defense. do you agree with the internationally recognized illegal settlements or not? do you think it's okay that they're there or not? there were several human rights organizations, 7 of them from israel, who have accused israel of war crimes. a 100+ report was put out by Amnesty International after an investigation and it concluded that israel committed war crimes. unless you've done some kind of investigation after the recent gaza attack, then your opinion is trumped by the human rights organizations reports and conclusions. see, it's comments like these that leads me to believe that you're here to make excuses and apologizes for someone who violates international law. there are numerous UN resolutions that have stated that israel has violated international law. there is no open interpretation to the clear resolutions. i don't think anyone here and anyone who respects and accepts international law disputes that suicide attacks that happened before and the rocket attacks that has been happening recently are wrong. however, for some reason, there are some here who try to apologize for and try to justify already recognized illegal actions by israel, such as the illegal settlements, land annexation both in the west bank and east jerusalem.

maybe that's the only way you can get an erection but for me, i find other ways to get excited about the world. after all these years and you still have a misconception of what power is.

you're an angry old man who, after all these years, have not been able to let go of your teenage angst and your obsession with blowing things up. move along. grow up.

yes. we know. you don't give a shit about international law and you don't give a shit about israel committing war crimes.