Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 68
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
It made me wonder if they wrote it up on the spot after Harper was finished.

It was wierd how CTV didn't get it at the same time as the CBC.

It was prerecorded and delivered prior to Harpers speech ending.

RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS

If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us

Posted (edited)
It was prerecorded and delivered prior to Harpers speech ending.

Not when we watched it here in Ontario.

Harper ended about 7:06 on CBC and they had to time fill with pundits until 7:28 because the tape hadn't arrived yet. CTV didn't even air it.

Edited by ThatGuy
Posted (edited)

I was on the CBC website a minute a go. I wanted to watch videos of the speeches by the leaders that were on TV earlier this evening. Harper's worked fine. Duceppe's worked fine. For some reason Dion's camera phone speech wouldn't work. Was this the result of a technical difficulty or was it not working on purpose. I am so sick of the tax funded CBC being the media arm of the Liberals.

This was formerly the Opening Post of a thread entitled CBC Bias?

It has been merged into this previous post on the same topic.

Edited by Charles Anthony
merged threads
Posted (edited)

If the CBC is the media arm of the Liberals, why would they have purposely screwed up Dion's tape? Does not compute.

Edited by Charles Anthony
deleted re-copied previous post

"We always want the best man to win an election. Unfortunately, he never runs." Will Rogers

Posted

I watched a bit of the National and one piece had the CBC making talking points about the CPC using the word "Separatists vs. Sovereignist".

Economic Left/Right: 3.25

Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.26

I want to earn money and keep the majority of it.

Posted
I watched a bit of the National and one piece had the CBC making talking points about the CPC using the word "Separatists vs. Sovereignist".

annnndddd theeeeeeeeeeeeeen? no and then? we need land shark... quick.

"They muddy the water, to make it seem deep." - Friedrich Nietzsche

Posted (edited)

I caught a portion of a CTV broadcast where this issue was discussed (CTV received the same poor-quality video, apparently, and they received it too late to be broadcast at the same time as the others.)

They put a statement from Dion's spokeswoman, Johanne Senecal, on the screen. The statement apologized for the quality of the video and the late delivery, and said that they are investigating what went wrong.

At the risk of sounding partisan, I must point out that this doesn't really help Dion put aside the "absent-minded professor" image...

-k

Edited by Charles Anthony
deleted re-copied Opening Post

(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻ Friendly forum facilitator! ┬──┬◡ノ(° -°ノ)

Posted
At the risk of sounding partisan, I must point out that this doesn't really help Dion put aside the "absent-minded professor" image...

-k

Between our new PM and his NDP cabinet ministers who'll accidentally send intelligence to Bin Laden, we should be in fine shape.

Posted

Dion wants to lead this country he cannot even get his tape to the networks on time. talk about joe clark and lost mittons again. His speech was very hard to understand, got lost in translation I guess :)-

Hey Ho - Ontario Liberals Have to Go - Fight Wynne - save our province

Posted

The Liberals and the NDP with the support of the Bloc want to lead this country, not Dion. Dion is caretaker until his replacement is found. But you all know that... Further character attacks on Dion are de rigueur I suppose.

"They muddy the water, to make it seem deep." - Friedrich Nietzsche

Posted

That had to be one of the most rank amateurish productions I have ever seen.

It was late.

it was out of focus.

Stephanie was tripping on his tongue.

And this guy thinks he can be prime-minister?

It would have been funny if it wasn't so pathetic.

Then to top it off with a cherry - that book you could see that had 'hot air' on it?

hahaha

apropos, apropos

Those Dern Rednecks done outfoxed the left wing again.

~blueblood~

Posted

I watched both of the speeches, I'll comment on content.

Harper doesn't mention his government has another minority, He calls it a mandate.

It was not a decisive one.

He mentions the oppositions actions, but not his own.

He uses fear mongering-waving the Bloc around.

the Bloc:A federal party , elected to parliament, by Canadians.

He paints the oppositions as treasonous.

He paints the actions as ant-democratic, they are not.

And lastly, he portrays himself as the "big daddy" who will take care of everything and kiss all the booboos.

Long on irrationality and fear, short on substance.

Insults are the ammunition of the unintelligent - do not use them. It is okay to criticize a policy, decision, action or comment. Such criticism is part of healthy debate. It is not okay to criticize a person's character or directly insult them, regardless of their position or actions. Derogatory terms such as "loser", "idiot", etc are not permitted unless the context clearly implies that it is not serious. Rule of thumb: Play the ball, not the person (i.e. tackle the argument, not the person making it).

Posted
I watched both of the speeches, I'll comment on content.

Harper doesn't mention his government has another minority, He calls it a mandate.

It was not a decisive one.

He mentions the oppositions actions, but not his own.

He uses fear mongering-waving the Bloc around.

the Bloc:A federal party , elected to parliament, by Canadians.

He paints the oppositions as treasonous.

He paints the actions as ant-democratic, they are not.

And lastly, he portrays himself as the "big daddy" who will take care of everything and kiss all the booboos.

Long on irrationality and fear, short on substance.

Aww, interesting that you don't comment on Dion's speach. haha

Those Dern Rednecks done outfoxed the left wing again.

~blueblood~

Posted

Okay, surely anyone who isn't a total partisan has to admit that the optics of this aren't good. The Tories have a sharp, crisp, clear, professionally made video in every sense of the word - while the Liberals apparantly used a camera Dion's mother in law bought with her Zellers points in 1994 operated by a member of the cleaning staff they gave five bucks to. Are you kidding me!? This is a professional political party in Canada that aspires to lead the country next week?

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted
Check out Warren Kinsella's blog for some interesting reactions.

http://warrenkinsella.com/

I wonder if the MSM will carry Kinsella's call that someone should be fired over the Dion tape in tomorrow's news.

Warren Kinsella, more than any man in Canada, is reponsible for the vitriol and partisanship which makes it almost impossible for the parties to work together.

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted

I actually found Dion's speech more upbeat, delivered in a more positive manner.

Demonstrating inclusion. Demonstrating a plan to include all.

The Harper government has lost the confidence of fellow mp, that is true and obvious.

Canadians want Parliament to work together, that is true and obvious.

Coalitions presented as positive, and done in other countries, stressing cooperation, not conflict.

Talking about the economy, including all major city centres across the country, demonstrating inclusiveness.

Politician and rivals are working together elsewhere in the world, why not Canada?

Downplaying of fear.

Overall, the better of the two speeches.

Insults are the ammunition of the unintelligent - do not use them. It is okay to criticize a policy, decision, action or comment. Such criticism is part of healthy debate. It is not okay to criticize a person's character or directly insult them, regardless of their position or actions. Derogatory terms such as "loser", "idiot", etc are not permitted unless the context clearly implies that it is not serious. Rule of thumb: Play the ball, not the person (i.e. tackle the argument, not the person making it).

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,899
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Shemul Ray
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Scott75 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Political Smash went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • CDN1 went up a rank
      Enthusiast
    • Politics1990 earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Akalupenn earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...