Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 80
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
yes, so old that they should never be brought to light or questioned or opposed in a public forum...

So old that it has been brought to light, debated here till the cows went home and the mice scurried back to thier tin foil lined holes

RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS

If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us

Posted (edited)

well I don't see any on the main page going back a month...

but i sincerely apologize I cannot search the entire website for past references of the topic

So if anyone opposes the policies of their gov't they should only speak up about it in limited window of time before and after the legislation? And afterwards forget it ever happened? Even if the issue clearly still exists?

mainly that a "national emergency" is undefined.....and during a national emergency martial law will be declared....and the gov't has the right to seize property, citizens, mobilize civillians into mobilized work brigades, control all oil, water & electricity, etc., and to detain pre-selected people that have been picked up as possible threats through MAIN CORE and PROMIS(on uncircumstandtial evidence)....and the duration of continuity plan is undefined.....and this could all be defined as a fascist tyranny..

what a pleasant thing to imagine...

Edited by obsidian
Posted

not only is tinfoil great for storing and cooking food in

it's a great insulator from all the conspiracy rays

so far if tin foiled my:

deck

car

dog

cottage

every room except where i have my radio

my other car(except windshield, i bought 5'' thick glass so i hope it block them rays)

my neighbours house (snuck in and they didnt notice yet, but they'll surely thank me)

i even tinfoiled my cell phone so i wouldnt get cancer but now it doesn't work for some reason

and ive taped tinfoil to the inside of 100 newspaper hats i made they look GREAT!

im making a killing so far, i sell them on the side of the road every day, i cant even imagine how many lives ive saved!!

AND FOR A DELICOUS DESERT

mix 1 cup of powdered alluminum to anything and it will transform into a yummy choclate banana split sunday

(THE RUMORS ARE TRUE!!!BRITISH GRADE TINFOIL TASTES MUCH MUCH SWEETER!!!!!)

Posted
well I don't see any on the main page going back a month...

Well there is a surprise...you went back a whole month for a story that was published....

David Pugliese , Canwest News Service

Published: Friday, February 22, 2008

but i sincerely apologize I cannot search the entire website for past references of the topic

Actually, you can search the entire website....they have this thing...it's called a "SEARCH ENGINE"

And I pulled it up in one go.

http://www.mapleleafweb.com/forums//index....st&p=294111

I think that's one of the problems with the tinfoil set. They are intellectually lazy.

RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS

If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us

Posted
.....and during a national emergency martial law will be declared....and the gov't has the right to seize property, citizens, mobilize civillians into mobilized work brigades, control all oil, water & electricity, etc., and to detain pre-selected people that have been picked up as possible threats through MAIN CORE and PROMIS(on uncircumstandtial evidence)....and the duration of continuity plan is undefined.....and this could all be defined as a fascist tyranny..

what a pleasant thing to imagine...

Imagination is the operative verb....none of your claims can be backed up by any sort of legislation...just pure paranoid day dreaming

RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS

If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us

Posted
...what a pleasant thing to imagine...

Did we "imagine" voting for our "government" representatives too? Do you always react this way when the policy cookie doesn't crumble the way you like?

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted

no i mean in the context of a national emergency which was passed in feb 08, perhaps you

"Neither the Canadian government nor the Canadian Forces announced the new agreement, which was signed Feb. 14 in Texas. "

and the US soldiers will follow US orders in Canada, and i just outlined my many concerns over the US legislation regarding "national emergencies"

and wondering why the US would take orders from Canada if we ever wanted them to leave after(or disputed when the emergency was over), i don't want to be annexed for manifest destiny even if it is only an off-shoot

Posted
no i mean in the context of a national emergency which was passed in feb 08, perhaps you

You have already been shown the link to our previous debate on the issue.

and wondering why the US would take orders from Canada if we ever wanted them to leave after(or disputed when the emergency was over), i don't want to be annexed for manifest destiny even if it is only an off-shoot

The US "takes orders" from nobody, but it has been known to work cooperatively with other nations during a crisis or national emergency. The only way you'll be annexed is by continuing to dick things up domestically while obsessing on "Amerikans".

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted
Did we "imagine" voting for our "government" representatives too? Do you always react this way when the policy cookie doesn't crumble the way you like?

Yep. Well you voted, but since our elected representatives do what they want regardless, your vote means crap. Governmental policies are around much longer than any termed PM or President.

Posted

well actually BC i dont vote b/c I am not 18. the public should always openly criticize their actions if they feel it neccessary to do so, it's their right.

alot of the problems i have with the policies are decades old, does that mean they should never be revised???

If I make a decision I can never question it after the fact?

Posted
Yep. Well you voted, but since our elected representatives do what they want regardless, your vote means crap. Governmental policies are around much longer than any termed PM or President.

Speak for yourself....I'm quite satisfied with most of the policies from my elected representatives, and don't whine too much about the ones I dislike. There is another election in about 100 days for me....you....who knows when?

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted

The US and Canada has had military cooperation before. It has happened in emergencies. However, these new measures allow a US ranking officer to command multinational forces in Canada during emergencies. And vice versa. It would allow the militaries to cross borders without permission.

With the creation of the North American Union, you can also expect to see Mexican military personelle taking commanding roles in the US and Canada. This is the case for the European Union.

Ask yourself this:

If the NAU is to open borders and create a North American Union, why would the US spend all this time and money keeping those pesky Mexicans out of the country? In due time they will be able to travel across the border without much ado.

Posted
"dick things up domestically " care to elaborate?

and yes that was exactly my point the US takes orders from nobody

WRT "annexation", best to play closer attention to independence and separatists movements on your own turf than to worry about the Yankee bogeyman across the border. But if it's paranoid fear you wish, consider that in a so-called North American Union, Canadians would only be 8% of the population.

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted
WRT "annexation", best to play closer attention to independence and separatists movements on your own turf than to worry about the Yankee bogeyman across the border. But if it's paranoid fear you wish, consider that in a so-called North American Union, Canadians would only be 8% of the population.

lololololol... this is why you bring up Canada 92% of the time ...lololololol

Also, the French don't bother me none. GIT YER FREEEEDUUUMMM FRIIIEESSS !!! As long as it has cheese curds and gravy.

Posted
. It would allow the militaries to cross borders without permission.

Nonsense and so was the rest of the post.

RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS

If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us

Posted (edited)
lololololol... this is why you bring up Canada 92% of the time ...lololololol

This is a Canadian forum...no? Besides, it's fair play to return the ad nauseum "Amerika" rants in kind.

Edited by bush_cheney2004

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted
Nonsense and so was the rest of the post.

http://www.canada.com/topics/news/story.ht...ef-902a1d14879d

Canada and the U.S. have signed an agreement that paves the way for the militaries from either nation to send troops across each other's borders during an emergency, but some are questioning why the Harper government has kept silent on the deal

..

"Co-operative militaries on Home Soil!" notes one website. "The next time your town has a 'national emergency,' don't be surprised if Canadian soldiers respond. And remember - Canadian military aren't bound by posse comitatus."

Posted
This is a Canadian forum...no? Besides, it's fair play to return the ad nauseum "Amerika" rants in kind.

Nah, it's just those threads in where Canada is not even mentioned, but you never fail to bring it up. Eventhough this is a Canadian website, we do have US topics, and many other topics, buuuut you never fail to bring up Canada. I thought it was cute at first. But what I think does not matter.

"But but but... he does it too...." is nothing but a cop out.

But since this is the Rest of the World section of the website. I guess you can do like South Park and Blame Canada whenever your little heart desires.

Posted
The new agreement has been greeted with suspicion by the left wing in Canada and the right wing in the U.S.

On the one hand this seems rather dissonant yet somehow comforting. It indicates a good healthy mistrust of government is thriving. On the other hand its no wonder the Harper government has kept silent on the deal it probably doesn't know who or what to trust either.

I don't know if all this mistrust and apparent secrecy is very healthy in the long run.

I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical,
a liberal, oh fanatical criminal

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,015
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    agackibal
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...