Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Rumsfeld

Insults are the ammunition of the unintelligent - do not use them. It is okay to criticize a policy, decision, action or comment. Such criticism is part of healthy debate. It is not okay to criticize a person's character or directly insult them, regardless of their position or actions. Derogatory terms such as "loser", "idiot", etc are not permitted unless the context clearly implies that it is not serious. Rule of thumb: Play the ball, not the person (i.e. tackle the argument, not the person making it).

Posted
What is a Bliar? What is the purpose of this silly thread?

Bliar is what the Brits have converted Tony Blair's name into as an expression of their disgust over his lies about Iraq.

The purpose of this thread is to show that the World Court has a lot of legitimate work to do but is running up against the world's most powerful criminals who have the power to refuse compliance even while they use the Court to prosecute their enemies.

Thanks for asking.

"We have seen the enemy and he is us!". Pogo (Walt Kelly).

Posted
Bliar is what the Brits have converted Tony Blair's name into as an expression of their disgust over his lies about Iraq.

The purpose of this thread is to show that the World Court has a lot of legitimate work to do but is running up against the world's most powerful criminals who have the power to refuse compliance even while they use the Court to prosecute their enemies.

Thanks for asking.

The "World Court" is a farce. It has nothing to do with "the world" and even less to do with a court of law. It has everything to do with polical maneuvreing. Now you can thank me for that bit of education too!

Posted

Oh goodie a wish list thread, well first the commies/liberals in Canada for distroying Canadian Culture. Followed by the Bloc for being treasonist to this Country, then ship the socialist useful idiots out of Canada to any Islamic hell hole they want to appease and pander to. This is fun, get rid of the never ending beggers that show up at my door looking for handouts. Tree huggers and peaceniks will be on this list also. Oh and grown men who live in their Mom's basement who spend their days posting on internet forums (as opposed to working for a living) to further their socialist/communist cause. Like their predicessors, they shall fail but making them leave their safe haven of 1960's paneling will be so funny.

The bright yellow thang in the sky is called the SUN, for the Momma's boys.

Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy

Posted
that spelled rumpsfeld... get it right will ya?

;^)

i would also add, mr. moamar gaddafy, vlad plutonium...

No,no Mr Gaddafy is good now, cause the US say's so, he is their friend ;)

Insults are the ammunition of the unintelligent - do not use them. It is okay to criticize a policy, decision, action or comment. Such criticism is part of healthy debate. It is not okay to criticize a person's character or directly insult them, regardless of their position or actions. Derogatory terms such as "loser", "idiot", etc are not permitted unless the context clearly implies that it is not serious. Rule of thumb: Play the ball, not the person (i.e. tackle the argument, not the person making it).

Posted

Dick(less) Cheney

G. Dubya Bush

Madelaine Albright

Paul Wolfowitz

Michael Ledeen

Henry Kissinger

Donald Rumsfeld

Tony Blair

Bill Clinton (and Hillary too)

Douglas Feith

Richard Perle

Bibi Netanyahu

Ehud Olmert

Ariel Sharon

Boris Yeltsin

Angela Merkel

John Negroponte

I could go on... but I think this short list is a good start!!

"An eye for an eye and the whole world goes blind" ~ Ghandi

Posted
Dick(less) Cheney

G. Dubya Bush

Madelaine Albright

Paul Wolfowitz

Michael Ledeen

Henry Kissinger

Donald Rumsfeld

Tony Blair

Bill Clinton (and Hillary too)

Douglas Feith

Richard Perle

Bibi Netanyahu

Ehud Olmert

Ariel Sharon

Boris Yeltsin

Angela Merkel

John Negroponte

I could go on... but I think this short list is a good start!!

Do you think Yeltsin would wear the same suit he was buried in?

Posted
Do you think Yeltsin would wear the same suit he was buried in?

Perhaps, or he could borrow the hospital sheets now covering Ariel's comatose corpse....;)

"An eye for an eye and the whole world goes blind" ~ Ghandi

Posted

Putin would make a lively candidate

RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS

If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us

Posted
Putin would make a lively candidate

Putin can't hold a candle to the Bush/Clinton dynasty.

Putin at least got rid of a tonne of oligarchs let loose to carpet bag the Russian economy after the fall the the USSR. He has IMO done a great job.

"An eye for an eye and the whole world goes blind" ~ Ghandi

Posted
Putin can't hold a candle to the Bush/Clinton dynasty.

Putin at least got rid of a tonne of oligarchs let loose to carpet bag the Russian economy after the fall the the USSR. He has IMO done a great job.

And he has brought peace and love to Chechnya.........clamped down hard on political disent, stymied democracy and reform, working to re-start the cold war.......re-start the arms race

RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS

If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us

Posted
Dick(less) Cheney

G. Dubya Bush

Madelaine Albright

Paul Wolfowitz

Michael Ledeen

Henry Kissinger

Donald Rumsfeld

Tony Blair

Bill Clinton (and Hillary too)

Douglas Feith

Richard Perle

Bibi Netanyahu

Ehud Olmert

Ariel Sharon

Boris Yeltsin

Angela Merkel

John Negroponte

I could go on... but I think this short list is a good start!!

Why Merkel? What did she do? Who is Douglas Feith? I don't agree with Olmert, but Sharon and Netenyahu sure belong there. Why the Clintons? I think Putin's actions in Chechnya pretty much put anything Clinton did to shame.

"We have seen the enemy and he is us!". Pogo (Walt Kelly).

Posted
Why Merkel? What did she do? Who is Douglas Feith? I don't agree with Olmert, but Sharon and Netenyahu sure belong there. Why the Clintons? I think Putin's actions in Chechnya pretty much put anything Clinton did to shame.

I especially love Henry Kissinger on that list! HAHAHAH! :rolleyes:

Posted
I especially love Henry Kissinger on that list! HAHAHAH! :rolleyes:

Kissinger has been a popular human rights violation candidate over his activities with respect to Cambodia and South America, among others. There are a number of countries that he can't travel to because he would be detained for questionning. Look at his Wikipedia entry.

"We have seen the enemy and he is us!". Pogo (Walt Kelly).

Posted
Why Merkel? What did she do? Who is Douglas Feith? I don't agree with Olmert, but Sharon and Netenyahu sure belong there. Why the Clintons? I think Putin's actions in Chechnya pretty much put anything Clinton did to shame.

Merkel is no different that Harper. She cowtows to the same 'ilk'. ;)

The Clintons are as nasty as the Bushes - and think about it - if Hillary gets elected the Americans will have had a Bush-Clinton-Bush-Clinton Dynasty ruling thier 'nation' for the last decades.

I don't agree with all of Putin's actions - but he has done some other things which certainly have been good for Russians. I know that is nationalistic - but his taking back of national resources is something that WE in Canada should really be considering - before we have sold ourselves out entirely. I will admit I am not an expert or really that learned on the whole Cheychna problem - there is only so much time for all the injustices! Suffice to say I think there is more there than meets the surface - just as in the Ukraine. Sometimes old grievances die hard eh?

As far as Feith goes - I'd recommend you just google him - he is certainly a slimy individual. He has intricate links with Perle and a neocon in the first degree. Last I heard he has left the US.

"An eye for an eye and the whole world goes blind" ~ Ghandi

Posted
Merkel is no different that Harper. She cowtows to the same 'ilk'. ;)

The Clintons are as nasty as the Bushes - and think about it - if Hillary gets elected the Americans will have had a Bush-Clinton-Bush-Clinton Dynasty ruling thier 'nation' for the last decades.

Well maybe but I wouldn't put either Merkel or Harper in front of a world court.

What makes you say Clinton was as bad as Bush? I don't recall him doing anyhting nearly so murderous or stupid as Bush.

"We have seen the enemy and he is us!". Pogo (Walt Kelly).

Posted
Well maybe but I wouldn't put either Merkel or Harper in front of a world court.

What makes you say Clinton was as bad as Bush? I don't recall him doing anyhting nearly so murderous or stupid as Bush.

Clinton interned more drug offenders and strengthened federal controls that any republican (outisde perhaps of the current fiasco). Clinton was the typical say one thing do the other. At the very least Bush is quite transparant about he wants to do - it ain't pretty but it's obvious to see.

Now wrt Feith:

Douglas Feith

Make your own mind up.

So many of those who profess to 'save' us are just the other side of the same coin.

"An eye for an eye and the whole world goes blind" ~ Ghandi

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,927
    • Most Online
      1,554

    Newest Member
    Gurpreet255
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...