Moonbox

but did you say they want to kill old people, or what you're saying above here? Pretty big difference in the two lol.

Where?

This is the central fallacy of white fragility. You've somehow tricked yourselves into thinking that talking about racism is racist, which is preposterous. It's belligerently circular and self-deluded reasoning and your outrage proves the aptness of calling it white fragility in the first place. It's kindergarten logic, akin to "NO YOUUU!"

Sure let's see if the rumors and bullshit you read about on telegram or conspiracy websites ever turn out real. When you fling enough shit at the wall, some of it invariably does end up sticking. Nevermind that 99% of it is completely made up and eventually forgotten or proven false, as long as that ONE thing ends up true you can sit here and say: "AHA! We were right all alooong!"

?You're not my mom!?

Unstable people say unstable things. If you have any evidence to show there's trouble in paradise other than conspiracy trash sites, let's see them. Otherwise this is just another example of you flinging poo on the wall and hoping something sticks.

Who said that, other than you? This sort of post opens the debate on whether you're just incapable or reading stuff and interpreting it intelligently (like the sources you keep faceplanting on), or if you're going out of your way to willingly misrepresent it, like here.

Do you keep track of all the dumb stuff you say that turns out not to be true, or do you just sort of sweep it under the rug and pretend it never happened?

I understand what Critical Race Theory is and that it really has nothing to do with what fear-mongering Republican lawmakers are wetting their beds over. My point is about how they're literally passing laws and they got orange-man to declare an executive order banning discussions about discrimination etc, or anything that caused people to feel "discomfort" around the subject at school. The mind-blowing hypocrisy that's required for someone to complain about wokeism and censorship, and then turn around and call for a ban on discussions that make kids feel "discomfort" is indescribable.

Meanwhile Republicans across the US continue to lose their minds over "Critical Race Theory" anytime anyone brings up anything in the school rooms about the idea of racism. The rabid bedwetting over "wokeism" from Red States is comical considering they're literally passing legislation to ban discussing racism and things like that in their classroom. You couldn't get a better example of thought-policing, but here you are pretending the Republicans are the reasonable ones.

That's not how this works Michael. If it tells you the sort of thing you want to hear, it's 100% true.

You're not going to explain it because you don't have an explanation. You've embarrassed yourself AGAIN posting another reference/citation you didn't understand, and now that you've said a bunch of dumb stuff that's quickly and demonstrably false, you can only hope to move on.

There is medically confirmed and there is non-medically confirmed. What sort of non-medical confirmation are you thinking you're getting here? ? Either way, it doesn't even matter. You GROSSLY misunderstood everything about that document, especially with how you calculated a 3% death rate off of a total of 42,000 injections, when the actual injection rate was in the tens of millions. Good job again Goddess. Once more you've proven you're unwilling/unable to do 30 seconds of critical thinking when posting and citing references.

Nope. That's not the number of injections. That's the number of adverse event reports, of which ~25,000 were medically confirmed and the others were not. By Feb 1 2021 (one month before this document was published), something like 26 million vaccines (not all Pfizer) had been administered in the US alone. This document is also not reporting confirmed events caused by the vaccine, but rather a report of any/all adverse events that were reported after someone got the vaccine. That's why things like Hantavirus and Herpes are listed on the long list of reported events you referred to earlier. Hopefully we can both agree than the Pfizer vaccine doesn't give people Hantavirus! ? Once again, you spectacularly fail at understanding and interpreting your own sources.

but not at all, and the Courts agree it's not. All of your whining about it therefore appears to be little more than coping with how unhappy you are about your place in the world.

So are you supposing that "Hantavirus pulmonary infection" or dozens of "herpes" complications are side-effects of the vaccine, or...what exactly? ?

Your logic is shameful. The Ambassador Bridge protest especially was not designed to voice displeasure, but to cause max pain. Other people have rights too. People have the right to not have their factory shut down because of a bunch of angry truckers decide the best place to have a protest is a bridge that sees $300M+ of daily trade crossing. People have a right to be able to drive down their streets and not have them blocked for a month by a group of angry goofs. As I said, your right to protest is not limitless, and it's not a right to do it however and wherever you want. That is fact. That is why an injunction against blaring your truck horns was granted in Ottawa, for example.

Yet you have no problem finding all sorts of anti-Trudeau criticism online, do you?

Comparing CNN and RT is a false equivalency. You're comparing a private media firm with a heavy liberal bias against a state funded propaganda channel where the press has virtually no freedom in the first place. You're not getting a perspective from RT. You're being fed Vladimir's carefully curated bullshit.

Yes. Michael posted all sorts of examples earlier of what should be censored. I would say state-funded propaganda from a hostile foreign nation is another fairly clear-cut example of what should qualify. That's a no-brainer in my book. Why would we want to provide an easy outlet for Vladimir Putin to spread disinformation and undermine his political opponents? For freedom? Your signals are a little crossed on that one.

I'm aware of it, but the optics behind it made it fait accomplit no matter what. All it took was someone to publicly bring up why the cable companies were carrying a Russian propaganda channel and that was going to be the end of it. Canada's hardly unique in this either. RT is being removed all over the western world.

The government expressed concerns over RT operating in Canada. RT actually pays broadcasters to carry Russian propaganda. Regardless, Bell and Rogers dropped them on the weekend ahead of even a formal CRTC review. The optics behind carrying Russian state propaganda whilst Ukraine is invaded were not good for any of these corporations. Of course for you the only explanation is "Aaaah TYRANNY!"

It's not even the government that blocked RT. Again, your logic runs out from underneath you. Bell and Rogers can choose who they will and won't carry. They have chosen not to carry RT anymore (reasons are obvious) and they are free to make that choice. ?

RT is funded by...the Russian state. If you don't believe in public funding for the media, then RT shouldn't exist and shouldn't be supported. Try to keep your opinions straight okay?

I'm not interested in investigating far-fetched theories or doing your work for you. Your theories are yours to support with evidence and arguments, and you've not been able to demonstrate that you're capable of it. Rather, you continue to link us garbage that either doesn't say what you pretend it does, or outright contradicts you.