Bob Macadoo

Nope Argus is telling us their view.....no need for your distraction."The word means 'oppressed' and 'niq...ab' is it's name."......I think I learned that in a Heritage Canada vignette.

Right....since it's common knowledge that gov't corporations can't provide price effective service it forces Galen into Beer Store clutches......mwah ha ha......Sorry trying to imitate conglomerate CEO glee......

I didn't mean you or I.....I mean the new & improved media who look for any chance to portray unions as corrupt.

Oh so the litmus test is I should become PM so I have a platform to tell everyone to think turbans represent oppression......then it's OK? A reasonable person believes vaccines cause autism too.....I'm supposed to be subject to the mob's ignorance?

I was referring more to the Interbrew/Coors.....Sleeman (heh heh) conglomerate. Don't they own their distribution that Galen will need to get in on?

I was exaggerating.....in this case there is no conspiracy, no price fixing.....it was accepted to pay higher insurance rates to this company.Why is it OK for CEOs to be greedy, underhanded scumbums, but somehow if a union boss does it, for shame? This is about holding the union to account for the actions of an individual or individuals.

.....I guess it ensures they stay "non-profit". Price gouging isn't illegal either. As it stands now to me.....if their employment contract has conflict laws....kick 'em out and if not let the union vote to impeach them.....you know democracy......represent the people.......union.....ya know?

.....you didn't ask what Sikh's believe just as you didn't ask what Muslim's believe.....you asked what do personal attire represent. Just as you believe niqab's represent female oppression b/c a percentage represent that idea......I can believe turbans represent a caste society as I have observed a percentage of turban wearers display that idea......what? That's not the same thing you say......sure sure.....

....and it's not Wilson's, the chief's or the mayor's either to lose now. Funny the direct culprits won't be culpable.

A private enterprise can't invest their revenue to make a return? Your assumption is that these condos are for nefarious reasons. I'm not there yet. What difference does it make they are police officers? Union members can't make money outside their beat job?

....actually I was being sincere......I can see nothing appealling on choosing to emmigrate to Israel except for the defensive capability. Thank-you though for the slurs.....you've again defeated your own argument.

.....a caste society?

What about election based avatars is illogical or senseless? The only illogical thing I've see him write is about tearing up citizenship of overseas fighters.

....nuclear armaments?

Unfotunately the foxes make the rules for the henhouse.

Non-profits are not subject to conflict statutes any more than For-profits. Now if they were embezzling funds for service not rendered.....or defrauding in some fashion.....I'm with you. If though they have stake in a company providing full service to a company they have executive influence over......and that's all......there'd be alot of white collars in the slammer.I think the hub-bub is "it's obscene that UNION executives are greedy unethical bastards......letxs expose them for the Brotherhood frauds they are."

He's learned.....maliciously fine black people....it's OK.....their money's better kept in city hands. .....police dep'ts are better when they don't represent their communities. and most importantly, .....don't worry that you shoot black people b/c you're afraid of them.....the city will be on the hook for you when you lose the civil suit.

I believe the difference was lost on you. If you are against him as opposed to not with him (which is what the letter was) you are in common cause (as they are against Obama too).I personally like this one better; http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/03/13/obama-iran-letter_n_6864134.html?utm_hp_ref=canada&ir=Canada

Aren't there already LCBO satellites in corner stores of rural areas? Here's where I'm confused. Even if you allow Galen into the booze biz, the monopolists still own the distribution network. Can't they just charge Loblaw's enough to be uncompetitive?

Still not there. OPPA employees were "forced" to use a sole-source travel agency for OPPA business that had the executive as principals. Again a removable offence for the conflicts involved but unforunately that occurs in private business all the time too. Where's the criminality? The OPPA is not subject to any public office conflict statutes are they? I agree it's ethically ammoral but a union head office is just another private business and as capitalism teaches if you ain't lyin' you ain't tryin'.

I'm confused here. Are the allegations that these guys are embezzling profit out of the union pot? It reads like they are making questionable investments......it's fire-able but is it felonious? What services are they collecting in these separate companies.......airmiles? Just like the breaking article by the CBC alot of smoke but the fire is confusing.......and they have court filings now. I really question investigative journalism today.

Where again did Obama say the senators were with the Iranians? Correct me if I'm wrong but I don't think he called them "treasonous", but I know you track Obama's every word so please help me.

Were there any BC2004 posts in there?

......yep he gets to apply the great police culture he learned in Ferguson to another keen dep't.

I find it funny the privacy commissioner can not testify at the hearings......and by funny I mean telling... The witnesses yesterday laid out cogently exactly why this bill is messed up from the contraventions of the charter, to the inadequate funding in the budget, to the jurisdictional conflicts between CSIS/RCMP, as in the kind that led to 9/11 in the US and the ministerial individual decision making for no-fly lists (which were shown to be a problem when it wasn't at political whims). Opponents of the bill have identified the good (increased bond powers, etc.)......why can't the gov't come together with others on this? Is the election rhetoric really that needed for them?