Alta4ever

No its not many MP's are actually working in their Ridings. Their is a lot more to being an mp then sitting in the house.

Lets see you show a little respect. You tell me why these people are unqualified to hold the jobs they were given. You are the one asserting they should not have been appointed, so prove your case.

You can't claim its a non-partisan event and then have the leader of a political party speak at the rally, this makes it a partisan event.

So again I ask, can you prove they are not qualified for the jobs they have been given?

So if its non-partisan why is Ignatieff attending?

There is a big difference between worship and liking a leadership style.

So you can prove that these people aren't qualified?

I do no such thing, but I do like his leadership, the best we have had in generations.

Sorry I don't poll. But it did effect the amount I gave.

Fine but he did lead by example he put his money where his mouth was. Far more then the opposition appears to be doing.

Have you ever heard of leading by example? In this case it seems to have worked too, I heard on the radio yesterday that Canadians are giving 5-1 more then the Americans.

.

So you support corporate welfare?

I wonder how many minded when Chretien did it to stall the Somalia inquiry, and disbanded the Airborne Corps.

Well thats not hard since PC's are as far left as the Liberals.

Wow those are "cheap" appointments considering most donations are less then a thousand, if you go by those criteria I should have had an appointment since I donated in the 04 Campaign a couple of hundred bucks.

This is not about what he has done since taking office as President, its about what he had done before. Of course anyone upon taking up the office of the president would become busy have to start working since voting present as the president is not an option.

If CO2 is pollution you better hold your breath forever because thats what you exhaling. Show us the next evolutionary "green" approved step in humanity, a human who doesn't need to breath.

I think this election and November will see an anti incumbent sentiment in the US. People seem to mad at those in power whether republican or democrat, but since the democrats hold more seats they more at risk.

your a fool if you take this satire as fact

This causes all kind of political and about games, instead of one thing real and functioning democracy should be about, clear and unhindered expression of democratic will. To M-H: I also said that the fact that something has worked in the past is no guarantee of the future, just check your old TV or that first car. Or, in the social science / history, any number of societies that went away having been unable to adjust to changing reality. Whats wrong with this, I would vote in election after election if the opposition kept bringing the government down. eventually we would have a majority government either formed by the opposition because they were right or by those forming the minority government. This is one of the things that is fundamental in democracy, the more elections the better.

There is a 86 page judgement from the judge on this case that doesn't seem to fit what you are saying. In fact it directly contradicts your claims. Precedent has been set and since you don't seem to understand anything about our government, our judicial system, and our country this will be my last response to you since I am tired of reading your ignorant uniformed posts. I am adding you to the ignore list.

No it isn't.

Coakley Just conceded

I think we can call this thing. Brown will win.