Alta4ever

Well why didn't you just provide all these troubled youth a home instead of expecting the government to deal with it. Your part of society if you are really concerned you do it, make the difference for some of these youth.

Teaching them to say nothing while talking in circles and throwing hissy fits over losing five minutes of hang time with the in crowd.

Yippy skippy a peice of paper from a bunch of stuff shirts that makes him so great and wise, or is it that knows how to tell professors what they want to hear? I have no respect for him, he is the biggest blow hard to grace the whitehouse since Jimmy Carter.

When did I say Bomb them you are very ignorant, uneducated moron. Please don't try to put your words in my mouth. I am very much aware of the history of the middle east and the people and events that have shaped the last couple of hundred years. I read smelly old leather bound history books, you know the type of thing that people like you seem to gloss over. Barak isn't gettingto ivovled in other countries, did you not see on the news that he just sent another 17,000 troops to Afganistan? I doubt you know anything about about dipomacy and trade, it you ever decide to read a history book you will find that dipolmacy is very much like a game of poker, and trade is a part of diplomacy if you have friendly diplomatic relations you also have trade relations. Read a book.

Y so now they have fresh face lying to them day in a day what was his transparency and accounablity right the stimulus package wasn't even out long enough for the house to read it before they voted on it. they but it in a pdf format on the internet with scanned picture of the text so you could use text search features on it. It was put at midnight before the vote that it was even released. well you've just said it he's Jimmy Carter all over again trading with America's enemies want a great policy. Do you poeple even try to pay a little attention to history.

His education isn't worth the paper its printed on. he has no policital resume aside from voting present on a good number of bills during his campaign for president. I doubt he ever sat long enough in his senate seat to leave an imprint in it

Sorry I don't read wikipedia just use it for small historical references as for the most they get somethings right. As for social conservatives it is a label that really doesn't work the people you are refering to are more tranditionalist who want the laws to be applied as they were 20 30 40 50 years ago.

Ya right, OBAMA has accomplished nothing he has done nothing but do the same old same old liberal democrat politics so much for hope and change. All Obama ever could do was enthrall people with his speeches he is nothing but an empty suit helped by Henry Kissenger.

No history books are my friend. leftwing academa has perpetuated the myth of facists being right wing as they are too proud to admit that it was their ilk that wanted to dable in Facism at the turn of the century. They wanted to give you something to fear on the right so they would be able to enact their social policies.

That doesn't explain why it was the left that was enamored with the facists from 1900 thru the 1930's. It was porgressives and liberals that wanted to try Mussolini's experiment in both Canada and the US. Even Woodrow Wilson implimented some of the same policies as mussolini.

He was sent by another party to spy on what was to become the Nsap/ or Nazi party, he became interested and enthralled and eventually converted over to this socalist. He later changed the name to the national socialist policy. He beleived in government control of economy and social concerns. he attacked all political rivals, because they were polictical rivals. I know this is difficult for you people to understand because you continually swallow the crap you are spoon fed, but look at the actual economic policies and results of what both he and mussolini did and you will find socialism and the government domination over all life in the country. Both Stalin and Hilter had 5 year economic plans, the difference hilter allowed owners to stay in chage of the business, even though he mussed that it would have been if he could nationalize them, but did not to keep the upper class in his camp. It was playing politics. You need ot read some history books instead of just swallowing everything that your high school social teacher told you and the tv programs. This comes from the books Hitlers Disciples, the Final Solution, and IBM and the Holocaust. HIlter was by no means right wing, and maybe with a little reading about him and his political party and the lead up to world war two you might see the truth and not the brainwashing you have received by the socialists.

Not really it still amounts to france abandoning its colonies in hopes of negogcaiting them back.

I DON'T THINK YOU CAN READ, FACISM DOES NOT FIT WITH THE RIGHT SIDE OF THE SPECTRUM, IN THE WAY YOU THINK IT DOES, IT IS A PERVERSION OF SOCIALISM.

Facism is not on the right side of the spectrum. I don't really think their is a true right left line in ideology. The left right argement has deemed ot be wrong as two opposite spectrums of political thought. I now seen the idea of quadrants applied as well, but I still don't think the professors have it right. I think that the ideologies are more of a progression from an from little rule to total rule. IE anarchy to libertarian, conservative, moderate, liberalism, progressivism, socialism and here a split in the line to either facism or communism, as socialism has been proven to be the path to both.

I'm not so sure that they are from opposite side of the spectrum as Karl Marx said socialism was a stepping stone between capitalism and communism. Totalitarian states seem to be something of the left side of the spectrum as well. Totalitarianism (or totalitarian rule) is a concept used to describe political systems whereby a state regulates nearly every aspect of public and private life. Totalitarian regimes or movements maintain themselves in political power by means of an official all-embracing ideology and propaganda disseminated through the state-controlled mass media, a single party that controls the state, personality cults, control over the economy, regulation and restriction of free discussion and criticism, the use of mass surveillance, and widespread use of terror tactics. The term has been applied to many states, including: the Soviet Union, Nazi Germany, Fascist Italy, German Democratic Republic (East Germany), Socialist Republic of Romania, People's Socialist Republic of Albania, Ethiopia, People's Republic of China, Democratic Kampuchea, Democratic People's Republic of Korea (North Korea) [2] and Communist Czechoslovakia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Totalitarianism

Hey buddy Hitler was not right wing he was a socialist as was Musolini do a little reaseach about were their political minds started and finished and you will find it was in socialist parties. The difference between socialism and facism is a Nationalistic senitment, that is it. Both advocate a planned society, both advocate a government planned economy, both seek to silence opposition. If you feel that you have to fear the right and Harper you better have a look at the demons in the closet of liberalism and progessivism. Both for some reason were in love with Mussolini and his great facist experiment when it was new movement. They attached themselves to the idea of eugenics, among other questionable "ideas". A bail out of oil companies never was advocated by the right even when the hated bush was in the whitehouse. I think its time you stepped away from the smoke and mirror scary conservative leftist tactics of 2004, its old news.

Actually who where is wrong on that account as usual. For much of the eighteenth century, France approached its wars in the same way: it would let its colonies fend for themselves, sending only small numbers of troops—or perhaps inexperienced soldiers—abroad, expecting that battles for the colonies would likely be lost anyway. It would keep most of its army on the European continent, expecting that such a force would be victorious closer to home. The plan was to fight to the end of the war and then, in treaty negotiations, to trade territory in Europe in order to regain overseas possessions lost. This strategy did not serve France well in this war, as the colonies were indeed lost, but France had few counterbalancing European successes. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_Years'_War

I don't know whatever you are refering to a letter was written to the Premier of Alberta urging him to exercise the same provincal rights that both quebec and ontario do. What is so scarry about that?

that is because you and a lot of the masses are celebrity worshiping sheep. BAAAAAAA

I'm sure it was as he doesn't like t be shown up by the Prime Minister of Canada. Funny Our PM could give a detailed and quick response with Obama UMM AH. I'm sure he didn't like to be schooled on what a Leader should look like like.

Not important? The plains of Abraham battle was the defining batttle that gave the British Control over most of Northa America. Canada became a British colony, before it wa nothing more than a forgotten French colony, the French never really understood what they had. The Plains of Abraham set the stage for the opening of th west and the fur trade, it truely made Canada well Canada.

They do.

Had a lot to do with the re-inforced landing gear, we have some very rugged landing strips in the north.

Correction the current "Canada" that we live in came into being in 1982.

It does when the young offender act is invovled.