xul

Thank you for your encouragement. I don't think it is correct to tag anyone who said "Canada immigration policy needs to be modified" or "I concern about the cultural conflict between immigrants and Canadian" as a racist. On the contrary, I think people have these concern are reasonable though some of them may magnify the problem or lack the understanding of the policy of government due to lacking the overall information. Immigration is a policy, just as other government's policy such as taxing a house, it can be discussed. There are essential difference between these kind of concern and those who uproar against other races.

I think you were wrong. Your words eliminated all of those white guys who did not agree with you opinion about multiculturalism or some policy but voted what they believed in into "not white" immigrants. The fact is they are white and whether they are right or wrong according your judgement, they voted according themselves willing, not being forced by immigrants. So whatever Canada government mainly represents the mainstream opinion of white majority.

Perhaps he is the one who you supposed to be but the smartest one Perhaps he is just smarter than those ones you supposed him to be, so these ones could not understand what he said. I suppose he is the latter one.

Men like make their life easier because they are essentially lazy. Those who are glad to do things the hard way when they could have gotten the same result and easier way are just the smart ones who can anticipate the furture and know their temporary hard live will make their furture live more easer. In Canada, I guess these are the different of life between a MBA and his lowpaying labour works in their teenager. If one day Canada or American falled into a socilism system, that means CEO or MBA would no longer gain such more form their harder way of working and pass their property to their children, you would find CEOs and MBAs would more lazy then you think---smart, but more lazy than those not smart ones, just like communist officials in China. I remember several years ago, one yong my colleague told me:"The smart guys are smart because they are more lazy so they must find a easy way to get what they want." I think his state is right. Sometimes we doing something for others are essentially equivalence doing something for ourselves. Microsoft sell their Vista only $70 in China far less $350 in Canada. Do anyone think MBAs of Microsoft like Chinese far more than like Canadian or American? Of couse they are not. They do these just because they want to seduce more Chinese to buy their legal copy of the softerware and anticipate they will gain back in the furture. I did not advocate people to pursue a way to live in heaven, I'm neither communist nor clergy. If there is a student who studies Sir Isaac Newton' law of object movement at science or physics class in his middle school, sometimes he needs to neglect the friction to help him comprehending how the system works. This does not mean he thinks him lives in the heaven or outer space.

One day a motorist somehow ran his car out of road into a slippery slope. Several minutes later, a policeman patroled here and asked:"What happened?" A passerby answered:"The slope made the car down."

Obviously the culture of spanking is not adjunct with skin color.

Of couse you never heard it, but you could see it strolling around 20 topics next this topic. If my understanding of history of the Land now called Canada is correct, it have already been take over by alien life for hundreds years, no offend to any alien life here.

Thank you for encouraging me. It is not as good as it looks. I usually need the help of a dictionary to accomplish my post. But of couse, I also feel I have had some improvement. I think I mostly benefited from reading some books. One of the books is Harry Porter And The Sorcerer's Stone. There was a funny story of a magic mirror named Mirror of Erised in the book. It gave people a illusion of what they wanted, but neither knowledge nor truth. And, according the words of the book, "Men have wasted away before it, entranced by what they have seen, or been driven mad, not knowing if what it shows is real or even possible." Hope these may help all skin color fans.

Partly it is. Parly it is that market makes the wages down. Because not every Canada or American made products sell in they domestic market. In some poor developing country, to buy a pure American or Canadian made computer keyboard may cost a labour worker's one year's income. Just imagine, if you were the owner of a coffeebar, your bartenders' wage went up and up meanwhile your clients' income somehow dropped down and down, what would happened if you did not manage to cut down your bartenders' wage?

I agree all these words so this is one cause that I thinkt any system need a glass of poor just because most men, if it isn't all, are congenital lazy though each one's degree perhaps are different. And the class of poor's functions is, 1) to enforce poor to do more industriously for a better life; 2) to enforce those who are not poor to do more sedulous to avoid them fall into poor. And as all or most guys work industriously, the system will win the competation with other systems and survive. The another cause is that even if we find a way to make everyone same as every laptop computer made by Dell to fit for the job of CEO, MBA, lawyer,etc., whatever by a wave of wand or a new powerful educated system, Obviously there also need some guys do those lowpaying job. I agree all of these. But my statement based on two promises, 1)Harry Potter had wanded everyone to fit for the job of CEO, 2)all labour workers could be instead of robot. Of couse I knew these are not reality. This is not my suggestion. I just try to figure out there is not a perfect system to make everyone "equal" economically so I agree kuzadd's state of "the system need a class of poor". In deed, I think Canada's system is better, but not perfect and there are not a perfect system existed in the world.

Lets presume BNPs have taken over Canada and adopted the policy of that maintains an 80% white majorityand 20% minority, no offend to Canadian, just a presumption for discussing the topic. And now Canda have 80% white and 20% others, then BNPs build a Great Wall like China mediaeval emperors enclosured all Canada border let no one can enter or go out to keep this ratio, so everything seems OK--from some guys view point. But tomorrow, if there are some white "liberal girls" in 80% white population might not will to breed children but the 20% others might, many years later, the population of white would less then 80% and the others would be over 20%. So the BNP government had to do something to pull the ratio back to its initial position, they might be: 1. set up gas chambers and murder all "surplus" minorities; 2. hire outlaw Nazi doctors to turn some minorities to white; 3. kidnap millions of pure blood Britishes, Frenches, Germans, Spanishes, Russians, albino Africans and Asians....to make up the shortage of wihte guys; 4. throw all "liberal girls" into the dungeon of BNP's gods' temple, let a BNP clergy spank them to lecture them how to breed 12 children; 5. dispel some minority Canadian, give them a boat and throw them into Pacific Ocean. If any of them does not want to leave for having seasickness or something, police will shoot them; 6. .... If anyone thought this kind of "Canada" is good, just join BNP or CNP something and help it to take over Canada....

But sometimes I think one of kuzzd's touch is right---any system around the world, whether it call itself capitalism or socialism, needs a class of poor. Lets assume Mr. Harry Potter kindly turned every WalMart factory's labour worker to be the one as smart as his CEO or MBAs by only a wave of his wand, but obviously there dose not need so many CEOs or MBAs in the world and if there was a guy who ever worked in Microsoft headquarter, he might tell us that a man as "up" as Mr.Bill Gates also need have a lowpaying guy worked 3 doors next his office, there was supposed as a bathroom, to keep this room clean. Perhaps one day, those top scientists and engineers would invent a way to make billions of robots as smart as WalMart's labour workers replacing them, then each man could get a job of foreman something that made our system better and more equal. But the next moral problem we need to worry about is----if robots were as smart as a man, would man treat them equal?

Under the "pure blood" socialism, no one could succeed include the state. Just look into Soviet, its huge empire has collapsed just because its state selected oaf general secretary believed in a nation like American could likely spent its money to adopt 200 million people as an "equal" way. That's exactly happened in China in Mao's time. Some westerners do not understand why Mao carry on political persecutions once and again. They interpret it as "dictator pursuing power"---that's mostly not fact. His power had great enough far more than any ancient great emperors. I think he did these because he was a fanatical socialism theory believer. In 1949, Mao confiscated land lord's farms and contributed each peasant a piece of farm. But in 1958, he found some lazy peasants had sold the farms he contributed them perhaps only for several of luxury dinner. So he re-confiscated all farms he contributed to peasants and invented a community name People's Commune to re-equal all peasants. In 1965, he found some his communist officals has become more like their fromer Kuomintang predecessors---their son and daughter always inroll best school, under instruction of best teacher, get best job in government.... and peasant's kids aways will be peasants. So he launched a new revolution named Great Cultural Revolution to knock down the whole system he established 16 years ago. Finally in 1970s, Mao found most city born kids like me were well educated while peasant's kid still have problem to read his simplest slogan red book, it would be, because most parents in city were educated and most peasant parents in that time are illiterates, so he invited a new movement named Go into Countryside to send millions of city born young middle school students to village to help peasants---it did not work. I have been to a village as a elementary school pupil for two weeks for tasting the advantage of Mao's theory but I found I could not know how to help them because we did not share common cultural or value. In Chinese cities, western civilization have been penetrating into the traditional cultural for hundreds years ago and the generation of my parents was graduated from western style school no longer from traditional school. But in village, I just saw the only change was that the buddah or god in peasants' room was instead of by Mao's statue---it even sited in the same table of same place, usually beside the wall faced the door in their living room. I guess a Canadian soldiers who have go into a Afhgan village would have the same feeling with me. Go into Countryside ruined a lot of those youth's life. All Mao's life he was pursuig "equal", to those who did not will to give up their advantage he used violence to enforce it. This is the system cause of persecution happened once and again. But I think there are a lot of people who go into poor are not caused of their laziness, but just because they lack the ability to comprehend the system and play it. The system should have some space left for a decent lift of them and allow that one day their descendants could catch up others. And I think Canada's system have done these a lot. It's good, so perhaps not perfect. Giving up these system perhaps might bloom economy greatly like China, but also would lead to the most social problem China has faced.

I agree this part with you. But as a man who lives in a developing country since Mao's time, I know free is not easy to reach. If Canada troop allowed any Afghan going into their camp freely, I doubt this army camp could exist here more than 24 hours.

If you said these to me I would tell you I'm not a China patriotist and I think I will give up China nationality if I am allowed to have Canada nationality. But of couse, even if I was a Canadian, I would not agree that covering up Canada's fault is a good way to benefit Canada and Canadian. I posted a lot about China because I live in the country so I know it well though I don't think I know everthing about it.I'm not covering up Chinese faults but I'm trying tell you the truth. Thuth sometimes may make us very unpleasant, I could imagine how disappointment an unemployed WalMart canada factory worker would be when I told him China would not collapse as Russia soon. But at long view, the truth alway are better than falsehood. If I was the worker, someone told me the truth may let me pain several months, but it also can make me to shift my career in time to those China could not easily take over from Canada, such as a CF-18 maker to a bartender, if I was not fit to be a lawer, a doctor or a accountant something. If I lived on falsehood, today I came here and ask:"How long China will collapse?" Everyonr told me:"soon." So I drank a bottle of brandy and went to bed. Then tommorrow I came here and ask the same question and everyone gave me the same answer. and then the day next tomorrw and the day next next tomorrow.....I guess I would becom a real drunk not fit for the job of WalMart even if one day China really collapsed. I don't think this issue has any relative with freedom or democracy. Are there any one really believe China's pollution and other problem would vanish when its government turned to democracy and freedom? I don't think so. I don't think every words I posted was right. But I would be very grateful if any one found its fault and pointed it out for me. Taging every dissidence opinion is not the way those who really believe in freedom and democracy adopts.

You are Bush Cheney, you can ask Chairman Hu about this several months later in the Ceremony of Olympic. I don't know exact number. But my son's kindergarten have a dozen of British English teachers. My son's teacher is a British woman and someone told me she have lived in China for over 10 years. And I guarantee there are a lof of them. You might just think about it. How many Be747 China has bought from American recent years? These huge planes obviously does not fit for being domestic flight and they are obviously not only carrying immigrants to Canada. And I suggest if anyone in west who did not save enough money for his retirement, he could consider to immigrate to China because everything there is cheap and air and water is not poison enough to make him ending up with Cancer if he does not carry a cancer gene in his cells.

I just said if anyone book a flight to China, he need not bring air and water with him. And I think the pollution problem of China is not the problem of Communism but the problem of industrialisation. And don't forget China has the population of four times than American and 40 times than Canada. That means if one day every Chinese reach a standard of living as the same as American and Canadian, it will be a catastrophe of human being because all oil will be burned out though WarMart's factory might make everyone a cheap gas mask to keep us all from Cancer. And behind Chinese, there are billions of Indians, Africans, one day they will go the same way that Chinese is going today and "civilized" Westerner went tens to hunderd years ago, and no one could deny they also have the rights to pursue the dream of having a car or just a cook stove. So I think if the people of developed country did really concern about their own interests or benifits, they would give up some out of season political and religionary slogan and face the reality. Just imagine, if the communist give up and let you to be the chairman of China, what policy would you carry on? Close all WarMart factory and let peasants famishing to die? Or kidnap one million top American and Canadian scientists and engineers to build organic factory to make CPU? I guess you would have no choise but do the same thing that communists is doing. I think the right way of western country is that they should support the birth controll efforts of developing country. We must recognize that most poblem of developing country such as war, famine, genocide between tribes root in the fact that earth could not carry on so many people. If China had a population as the same as American, I think it would be good for both China and Western, whether their concern is on pollution or merely on keeping their job.

Obviously, If communism lead to pollution, North korea and Cuba would have more pollution than China.

I mean 10 years ago, there are not so many foreigners in China. In fact the pollution today is more worse than 10 year's ago, but foreigners are also more than that time. 35 years ago, then I was a kid and Mao was at power, I think China's environment is more better than America and Canada. All food are 100% organic and there were far less CO2,NOx in air because there were almost no car in streets. But foreigners were also as less as car and smoke. If your concern was pollution, you would not care those foreigners in Beijing were immigrants or MBAs of Walmart except they were kidnaped by China.

There really are a lot of Americans, Canadians, Birtiches, Frenches, Germans and of couse Russians lived in Beijing and you would not suppose the CEO of WalMart would shipped his factory to China and then left them in a Chinese harbor rotting. Every sunday I bought my son to parks I met these guys and their kids. I have never seen these guys use gas mask and they bought water and icecream for their kid from Chinese stall--- they might not bring icecreams from another side of Pacific Ocean. Would I ask how many years have passed after your last port call at China? I guess perhaps 10 to 20 years. Though I think you are the one of few guys here who have ever visited China.

It seems Mr. Bush will come to Beijing for the Ceremony of Olympic several months later. You might advise your government to get a gas filter mask on American President's face. Honesty, I don't think China's environment is as good as Canada's and American's, and there are too many pollution problem and its huge population is making circumstance worse, but it is obviously that China's ennvironment is not as worse as some western nonsense description. If anyone here got a western newspaper or magazine, he would found there was a article said water and air in China posioned people to cancer in front page, then another article in second page said China was overpopuled by it having 1.4 billon people, and in third page there was a "writer" said China is running into aging society and would collapse soon.....but if he used his mind thinking, he would find if China's enviroment is as worse as the first article said, China would not go into aging society because all its people would died in the age of 40 or 50 and China would not overpopulated. And, perhaps the fourth article is a newletter, about that President Bush called for China Chairman Hu to import more American made vehicles, air planes, chemical factories, power plants, iron ores.....full family of carbon dioxide and NOx generators, and after CPChina bought all of these, the human rights status in China would "improve" greatly for several months until American companies finished all those Chinese bills and needed next round bills, then China human rights would go worse again and another American president needs to telephone another chairman to re-improve it .....

Unfortunately pure blood capitalism only emphasizing heirdom of money. It judges everything include wisdom by the ability of gaining money from market. This is why capitalism system needs to be modified by socialism theory and other theory or other systems(such as honor, charity, belief, etc. ). To those politicians, sometimes I think they like a kid playing a computer game. The computer game names "nation" or "country", the control panel grabbed in his hands names "system", his right hang presses on a button named "capitalism" or "market solution" meanwhile his left hand presses on the button of "socialism" or "welfare", and his job is to use both his right and left hands to keep the game not out of course. And there are a lot of guys such as his mother, father, uncle, aunt....named environmentalists, humanists, pacificists.... just standing behand him to advise him how to play the game. So the game in reality is that mixes all those demands but not satisfys all demands. Sometimes I think people need have some tolerance to our politicians.

I think the theory of capitalism is based on three fundamental point: market competation, private property and heirdom. Under a capitalism systerm, everyone's work must deliver to market to exchange with others work to decide its price. How much a person would gain depend on how much his work was recognized by market. Acception of private property and heirdom because human being are essentially self-serving creatures. We work mostly for sustaining outself and our families rather than for others. This self-seving character is the main motivity to enforce people taking part in market competation(to most of people the experiences of market competation is not always pleasant and easy). "Pure blood" capitalism theory have some genic limitation because two of its fundamental points, private property and heirdom, sometimes conflict with its another fundamental base of market competation. For one, a CEO get a good salary more than his workers, so under the pure blood capitalims system---that means government do nothing for low income people such as set a public school for their kids, CEO's sons or daughters will have the best toys and books, enroll the best schools and universities, under the instruction of best teachers and professors....then his children will have far more advantage than his workers' kids and will easily win the next round competation. So the result of the first round competation will limit the next round competation. Without intervention of someone here so called "unelected, irrepresentative Canadian interests' Canadian politicians" and "sloganized liberal girls", I guess hundreds year later Canadian would divide into two "races", not based on skin colors, but based on who has a CEO ancestor or a pauper ancestor, and some "liberal girls" so called "supremacists" would have more opportunity to fall into the second "race" and a descendant of Arabian king would have more oppotunity in the "first nation". The theory of socialism is an attempt to make up the fault of capitalism as a result of private property and heirdom. Socialists emphasize their theory based on the fair system of "more working, more gain" ----it seemes very reasonable and attractive but this theory also has its fault. I remember someone here had yelled at me "as a writer, I gain more than you"---to this comment, I would say I have no doubt some whore worked in a Las Vegas' casino would get more than some writer----but that means nothing. Now the income of a whore, a writer or a engineer depends on the market recognations, this is a capitalism solution. If we use the socialism theory to make it "fair" or "equal", it will raise a new problem--- who has the authority to judge a engineer, a writter and a whore's work harder than others? Of couse only government or politicians have such authority. This is why those countries pursuing socialism are easily fall into autarchy and dictatorship. Though a lot of people call developd countries or western countries "capitalistic countries" but they are not. Perhaps at their first hestoric stage they might be pure blood capitalism but now, the systerm of western are mixed with capitalism and socialism system, really a "multi" system. I think western system could be defined as "socialism theory modified capitalism system" and china today's system could be defined as "capitalism theory modified socialism system".

I guess it is due to the reality that the salary of being a silly story "writer" is "up" than being a journalist risking life in the battlefield of Afghanistan.

Yes, it is. But to those who had followed it or read it, it just shows a obvious evidence that spanking is not good for kids. Sad:(