xul

Thank you. I will come some day if I could help. I have just watched the video. It's great and very impressive. Contrast with the video you recommend, the CCTV's simulator video of the spacecraft China launched resently is really worse. I think if the CPC's dictator came here and saw the video he might piss his incapable propaganda CCTV off instead of hiring this website.

As a foreigner, I'm not sure but I think maybe "More localized governance" is a way but it is not the best way for Canadian. I have never been to Canada but I have no doubt that not each inch of Alberta territory is filled with same oil sand and not everybody in Quebec used to speck French. So if these provinces were "more localized", they could also not stop some town or cities asking for "more localizing" form provincial authorities according the same theory.

Maybe those western "vote=democracy" formula-prescribing doctors who have created a lot of messes in some third world countries could find a way in this worldwide-democracy system to protect their own insterests just as some people in those third world countries who were often accused by them were just trying to protect their own right in their home town from their peasant majority's plundering under a exterior-enforced and tolerance-lacking "majority rule". Maybe it is better that those western guys can modify their method of "universal suffrage" to a capitalistic directorate democracy way---one $, one vote so "their kind" can still keep to rule the world in this world-democracy.

Honestly, if he won it would be better to Canadian. Do western capitalists's factories exist "harmoniously" in China under his party's rule at present, don't they? But I guarantee there will be a far worse one will win due to the fact that most supposed voters in this assumption only concentrate on their own interests without any respect of others rights.

Thank you for introduce these website to me. I have said my speciality is not on aerospace engineering. I know these knowledge just becasue I was ever a fun of aerospace technology when I was in High school and college. I think there is not a absolute universal correct or wrong way to solve a single engineering problem. Some engineers likely adopt this way, others like other way, depending on their knowledge, ability, understanding of the problem, the schedule, and of course the budget their boss offered them. So maybe you are right, but Chinese solution maybe isn't wrong. The solution is based on their country's reality, that means their country is still a developing country, can not afford such money which American spent to develop areospace technology, and in fact China government did not spend lots of money funding aerospace industry just as everybody thought. And so far, It seems they are success especially in the aspect of cost-efficiency. I don't think China's aerospace technology is match with America or Russia, but China did spent less money to achieve its main goal than other countries, this may be correct corresponding their country's circumstance.

The propellant tank of a rocket mainly is made of aluminium based metal. As an oxidizer, N2O4 can make aluminium an oxide layer and it will protect aluminium from farther corrosion, so N2O4 can be kept in the tank for long time. And it also has lower liquified pressure so it is easily to be sealed in a pressurized propellant tank without supplying additional supplement ceaselessly like liquified oxygen and hydrogen.This is why UDMH/N2O4 were called "storable propellant". The pair of UDMH/N2O4 were mainly used ICBM in 1960s to 1970s because they have such advantage. And I guess there still are some liquid ICBMs on service in Russia, China and maybe America over several decades, and there is no evidence that any of them was corrupted to be breach. I think American turned to kerosene and liquid oxygen booster in their Saturn project just because kerosene and oxygen is cheap then UDMH/N2O4. A saturn V rocket lift-off weight is about 3000t, so developing kerosene/oxygen boosters is higher cost-effectiveness than developing a new generation UDMH/N2O4 boosters for the new rockets. The first generatioin space launch vehicles use UDMH/N2O4 just because they are based on ICBMs. The lift-weights and payloads of ICBMs are suitable to launch earlier spacecrafts which only can sustain one to three astronauts in space for several days. If Chinese choise to lauch payloads far heavier than present spacecraft, such as landing something on moon, they also may choose alternative solution for their new rockets and boosters. ChangZheng 5 Heavy-Load Space Launch Vehicle I think you means these words: You just don't understand Chinese political terminology. This "irreversible" is not technical irreversible but political irreversible. Charging propellant into rocket means all technical tests and checks has beeb passed, the weather forecast has said OK and, the chairman of CPC, who would be a mainly delay factor if he wanted to watch the launch and happened had no time in the scheduled launch day, has decided which day he have time to come. You are right. But why Chinese must give up their mature UDMH/N2O4 booster to develop a new rocket if its payload is suitable for sent three astronauts into space for a short journey? In fact, the UDMH/N2O4 boosters of Long March rockets have never failed for almost 30 years in over a hundred of launches. Several cases of launch failure you cited were due to other problems such as control system, not due to UDMH/N2O4 booster. And I think UDMH/N2O4 liquid rockets have been launched thousands times around world in past 50 years, the problem you said were not reported. In where they are? If you think today's chinese medias and websites are all run by the CPC and what they said are exactly the official stance of China government, you are absolutely wrong. This video link CZ-3B failure comes from China's largest website SINA, but obviously it was not the CPC posted it there. If you wathch the video, you will find it is the same as the video you cited. At present day, the CPC no longer forbids people talk about such technical failures, so you can find some big-mouth guys all the time. If you can read Chinese words, you can find lots of CPC-beating posts in all kinds of Chinese website forums, even those western media so-called Chinese young nationists also like beating the CPC when they refer to Chinese domistic problem, especially for the reasons of the CPC failed to offering them from safe food to offering them a good job and salary. But you could not suppose there would be an uprising tomorrow. In any case, there were not 500 people killed, not even 50 or 25. The video picture showed is truth but the voiceover was wrong. One of my colleagues told me she was there and lived in one of the white low-rise apartment-liked building(it's a hotel or dotmitory for technicians from industry department who come here to instruct the launch) but that night all these building shown in video were almost empety. Exactly the destroyed building in vedio is not a real "village", it a part of the base, they are the dormitories of technicians, soldiers and the peasant families(different from western army, in China the families of army officers are allowed to live in the base, and they usually use those "free" field in the base to grow vegetables and sell them to army to gain more money) of army officers in this base. This is why soldiers guarded the debris, they were just protecting anyone who would pick-up their military files and facilities under the debris. But at the moment of the lift-off of the rocket, no one but only several on-duty soldiers were keeping perimeter of these evacuated building.

NASA sent chimps into space first because at that time there was not a man went into space before so scientists were not sure whether zero gaivity and other space environment were fatal to a man. But before China lanch its astronauts, there were lots of American and Russian astronauts had already been sent into space, so it is not necessary to repeat what American and Russian did fifty years ago. I happened to work in China's space industry in 1990s. Though my job is only on designing ground vehicle not relative with rockets at all, but some my colleagues were at scenes and they told me the stories about the two events. The first event in 1995 was then a newly designed rocket named Long March-2E, it was its third or fourth fly. It was launching an America made communication satellite for an Australian company. After lift off about a hundred seconds, the satellite exploded due to resonance or some cause between the satellite and the rocket, mainly because the distrust between America and China governments limited the technical information exchange between American and Chinese aerospace engineers. After the explosion of the satellite, the secure system of the rocket self-destructed the rocket to avoid it went into wrong orbit. Some of the fuel tank debris fell into a village and some ignorant peasant picked those poisonous fuel contained metal up their home for sale, so they were poisoned by the unburned poisonous fuel, several of them died and others in hospital for several weeks. After the event, Chinese engerineers has improved the design and CZ-2E has never failed again. The second event in 1996 was another newly desinged rocket at that time named Long March-3B and it was its first fly. The gyroscope failed just after it blasted off several seconds. The rocket crushed several mails away from the launching pad and damaged a lot of houses and buildings nearby the scene, but only several people died in the event because most people had hided in bunkers. So-called "five hundred innocent got killed" is not truth. After the event in 1995, almost no peasants would dare to defy government's advise of hiding in safety.(In 1995, they also were demanded to hide but no one took it seriously because such thing had never happened before.) Since these earlier failure, Chinese rockets have never failed again. This is why CPC has confidence to live program the whole process of this mission. And though I'm not an aerospace engineer, but I don't think it is more difficult to let fuel out from a rocket fuel tank than let it in. Just making a hole on the hull and mounting a valve or something, it wil be OK. And I guarantee all of those Amerian rockets, Russian rockets, Chinese rockets, French rockets, Japanese rockets, Indian rockets, North Korean rockets, Iranian rockets....also used this way to drain the fuel if it is necessary. And about N2O4, it was chosen by both American and Russian as rocket propellant of their liquid ICBMs just because it is safe and storable. It can be filled into a ICBM fuel tanks for several month without need of drain it out. How would we imagine if an American Titan ICBM was filled with fuel, it must blast off at once to trigger WWIII? Or American must halt to charge their Titan fuel until they find Russian nuclear missiles flying to them? I think you confused the dangerousness of storable liquid propellant(N2o4/(CH3)2NNH2) and hydrogen/oxygen propellant. It is the hydrogen/oxygen propellant are unstorable and more dangerous. If a malfunction occured after the fuel of shuttle has been charged and it is going to be lift off, NASA must reconnect a leakage pipe to the tanks to let out the oxygen/hydrogen vapor to avoid the shuttle oxygen/hydrogen tank to be breached, and if fixing the problem needs long time, the fuel must be discharged because under the normal temperature the pressure of liquified hydrogen/oxygen is very high, and any hull of rocket can not seal it.

The newsletter you quote from BBC were correct. Nowaday I can visit BBC's website, I just clicked the link you offered and it works. I have also just visted BBC's and VOA's chinese launguage webpages http://news.bbc.co.uk/chinese/simp/hi/default.stm http://www.voanews.com/chinese/index.cfm and its english webpage, all of them works. I still can not visit chinese.dalailama.com. and some Chinese language separatists or dissidents website. I believe that host of Olympic Games has done positive effect on Chinese people to access western media via internet. I think some westerner's "political-correctness" also did positive function for CPC maybe feel very funny to let Chinese people to see by which words these political-correct guys used to comment China and Chinese. And please allow me to add some my new idea about the BBC's article: Obviously Google is right. If everyone accept the thoughtway the political-correct "writer" showed in this article, I guarantee everyone would see more "spectacular" things than any Olympic Games, such as: 1. some members of this forum would not be here, because American/British/Canadian immigration officers would refuse to issue their parents or greatparents visa for their countries failed to give all Jews visas in 1930s so they would issue no visa to any Jew. 2. police would stop to catch thieves because they failed to catch all thieves. 3. doctors would expel some their patients who have sickness such as asthma or Cancer from hospital, for they can not cure them so they would better stop to treat them. 4. we would stop to have any meal becasue there still are someones in somewhere are starving. 5. ....

I think there always are some people in the world who would never like to be China or anywhere they dislike but merely gether information from newspapers or refugee lawyers' advertisements which fitting their tastes, just as those old-time clergies of Inquisition burnt astronomers never so much as bothering themself to look into astronomers' telescopes. If I was a Canadian army officer in Afghanistan and have a invisibility coat, I would rather like to put on my coat to visit some neighbour villages. Not for showing respect to anyone or spitting on anyone's face, but for understanding what have happened in vicinity and anticipating what will happen.

Just like Britisher are also very proud of their nation's history regardless for thousands years of the history their king and his "regime" were also not elected

I think you don't know how an authoritarian system works. Under a system if an athlete who go to a foreign country for Olympic Games also needs to do something to show his "politic-correctness" all the time to cater for the decree of a dominant power, the system is a really authoritarian system and the dominant power is equivalent with the dictator whether it is called a king, a chairman or a media.

Lets count the compose of the gold medal of Chinese athletes: [GROUP 1] Weight lifting:--9 shooting--------5 archery---------1 Judo------------3 fencing---------1 swimming-------1 badminton-----3 rowing---------3 wrestling-------1 table tennis----4 boxing----------2 Taekwondo----1 sum------------34 [GROUP 2] diving: 6 gymnastics: 9 trampoline 2 sum-----------17 Usually Group 1 such as weight lifting,shooting, fencing and boxing can be considered as they can hardly effect by judges. In Group 2, China traditionally take lead in these competition. So only the medals of gymnastics and trampoline can be considered to be effect by judges. And I'm not sure but I don't think judges are chosen by host so I agree in some events judge might do little favour to host athletes. In 2004 Olympic Games, Chinese athletes get 32 gold medals and American athletes get 35 heading the list, the gap was not very big, so as host China catch up America is reasonable. In any case, I think the medal list is not import in sports meaning. I think it mainly means if a country have someones (government or business) who like to fund the athletes to get success. I'm not sure, but I guess the yanger ages which showed in a website(I suppose the ages of the newsletter come from the same source ) just due to some CPC's local official's stupid mistake, not due to a real age fraud. Please think about it, What is the good for CPC which can gain from this would-be fraud? The honor of two additional gold medals? As gymnasts, who can guarantee them could certainly get the medals? But what is risky? There are doctors and nurses, relatives, neighbors, teachers, classmates, policeofficers, coaches, fellow gymnasts...maybe there are nearly a hundred of people who know their real age. How about if one day one of them immigrates to Canada and leaks the secret to theStar? how would CPC do to protect them from the scandal?

The original date of the games is July 25th to August 10th , but the meteorological research show thunderstorm often happened historically during these days in Beijing, and it is also too hot. The meteorologists suggeted to defer the games two, three or five weeks. Three or five weeks is better from the meteorologists's point of view for the days are cooler and more rainless, but they conflict with some athletes's time-table of their domestic tournaments. So IOC eventually chose August 8th(2 week later from July 25th) as the day of opening ceremoney. It is just a coincidence.

I'm a fan of photography and also has a lot of photos of the places I have ever been to. It's very sad that this "political" forum doesn't support photo upload. Maybe visual information are more harmful than literal state to "political-correctness" Of course, they are not always harmful. If anyone here slightly knows about photography he may agree with me that people can not distinguish smoke and fog only from a photo. If God gave us the ability to distinguish smoke and fog by eyes, he might not creat us noses. In any case, being a man with normal olfaction who lives in Beijing now, I can tell you the so-called smoke which some western media such as theStar alleged covering Beijing before the opening ceremony of Olympic Games were mostly fog. Such sweltering foggy days always happen in July and August. I'm kinda surprise that Since the games began the weather has become cool and the bule sky has reappeared after all fog was blow away by breeze so it is good for athletes to do their best. Such weather usualy only happens in later September and October but not often in August. I think maybe a Chinese political joke in internet is truth that God has decided to bless athletes maybe and China, by the way American don't worry for I'm sure he will still continuously bless America as he ever did , for counteracting and balancing the bother and suffering which those political-would-be-correct writers falsely imposed on them. And your understanding of the cause of the air pollution in Beijing is correct. Though Beijing is the second bigest mega city in China, but its industry limits in pollutionless products such as vehicles, computers, automation and communication facilities, aerospace products. The electricity mainly comes from Shanxi province, 600 km away from Beijing and a main coal producer in China, to cut the cost of coal transit. The most smoke comes from burning fuel or coal to keep its 14 million people's home warm. Another main cause is from the exhaustion pipers of 3 million cars and vehicles. So the pollution in winter is worse than other seasons. The air in winter is dry without fog so people may easily see blue sky but the pollution still exists. The air in Summer are more clear, but the sky is often coverd by fog and clouds. Sping usually is windy and too dry, the autumn, from later september to early november, is the best days for tourism.

I don't think his ethnicity or immigration might consequentially result in this, but I think his experience might be one of the causes of triggering or aggravating his illness or anti-social behavior, though obviously if he does not have his own problem nothing can trigger him to do this, just like most of the guys who have similar experience are really normal and may not bother themselves to crash a road lamp to release their frustration.

I don't think economic pressure can certainlly result in mental illness. In fact doctors and psychologists have been arguing all the time for what is the real cause of mental illness. Most of them believe it is caused by mental problem, but recently more and more of them think hormone disorder maybe gene are also the cause of mental disease. But economic pressure might trigger or aggravate mental illness if a man who has already had some kind of mental or physiological weakness. I listened a article from a VOA's CD which I used for leaning English recently, it said some American psychological researchers have studied the cases of the mental problems of some American soldiers who were in Iraq. The researchers believe most "brutal" things(such as throw a dog off a cliff) some soldiers commited were due to war pressure. But obviously the pressure only can effect on few men, just as pollen have no effect on most men but can cause allergic to some people. Of course economic pressure is not the only trigger of mental illness. There is a case in Calgary which is similar with Li's case. Police say Calgary man killed wife, kids, tenant and himself with a knife He is not as well-known as Li because he commited his crime or illness in his home so there were not a lot of people onlooking. Both of them are "normal", perfect and popular employee commented by their bosses. But the different is that Joshua Lall was obviously not poor, he worked in an architectural company as an architect and he owned a house or something. I remember some articles said some of his friend recalled that he ever told them he could "hear voice from devil", but obviously even if some of them though he had mental problem, no one took it very seriously before he really did something. I'm not sure a person who applies Canadian citizenship needs physical or mental examination. I guess Canadian government does not require it because the politicians must be "political-correct". If Canadian citizenship law declareed "being a Canadian must not be sick, mad, disabled, unemployed or political-incorrect", it would not be good for Canada for it sounds like Hitler chose who would fit to be German in 1930s. But before someone whines again with "Canada government does not represent Canadian's interests", I think I'd better point out even if appling citizenship is not required with health examination, but appling immigration is required with these conditions(except "political-correct" for Canadian politicians do not want their nation to be treat as a autocratic country) for recruiting immigration just likes a company recruiting workers, so no political-correctness needed and no one can apply citizenship before apply immigration first. So thoes guys who always whine politician does not represent them need not to worry about politian's handiness to play the political-correct balls under the rule of their own system. I agree with you. But usually government and media might try to smooth and seal it but research into it for fear of raising racial problems which might become their own political problems.

I'm not sure by what Hitler chose prisoners of his concentration camps, but obviously he didn't depend on suits or accents which people weared and spoke. Obviously after nearly two thousand years, some Jews who lived in German still decided to keep their culture, religion, language and maybe a dream of that one day they could come back and rebuild their country, and I'm sure they have rights to do so just as if a pure blood German decided to turn to Judaism no governments have right to stop him. I agree "multiculturalism" is not equivalence with "multitribalism". I mean in my comprehension, the purpose of the policy named "multiculturalism" is not to encourage people to keep their culture and live in their respective tribes permanently but accommodate other people's culture, and eventually people may melt naturely not by force because in any case they live in the same country so they share more same interests then the people whom they ever belonged to.

At this point I agree with you. Political relationship is important to the other 20% high-end goods and services because the buyers of such high price goods usually are China government or state-runned projects. Though someone may think Canada imports more goods from China so Canada could take advantage in any conflicts but the fact is it is not. Most China made good buyers in Canada are common people so Canada government can not stop them to buy Chinese goods just for some silly right wing's "political-correct" reason, but another CPC did have ability and willing to buy nothing form those guys who are very unfriendly to them and these guys cannot depend on WTO to support them for China government is the buyer in the deal so there is not any intervene could be convicted just as Canada government always bought Canadian made warships and American companies can not complain such kind of unfair in WTO, and those so-call western "friends" of Canada will not interest in backing Canada in WTO because the loss of Canada companies would be the chances of their companies. I think everyone would agree with me that there are overmany airplane manufacturers in the world and the market is shrinking. And the success of the 20% high-tech companies represents the future of Canada unless people here like Canada sink into a developing country which only sells oil, ore or something.

I don't think China government or Chinese people will take Mr.Harper's absence for a big deal for he doesn't politicalize his absence as a boycott in public. And in fact it was not that China government invited him or anyone, it is a Olympic Games tradition that each of IOC members can have a free ticket for only one of their national leaders to attend the opening ceremony. I remember several weeks earlier, a Chinese newspaper reported some India media accused that China government didn't invite Indian PM attending to the ceremony but had invited another India senior politican Mrs. Sonia Gandhi. The newsletter said a spokesman of China Foreign Ministry said that "we have to respect Indian Olympic Committee's decision". It seems that Indian Olympic Committee made such decision for some reason and both China and India governments have not right to intervene them. I have just seached in internet of which countries's top policital leaders were absent the ceremony. It is very funny that Sudan and Zimbabwei presidents, China was often accused for backing them, were not there but Israeli president was there . But I agree that the relationship between two CPC governments are cold though it seems both of them recently have some will to make up it.

I agree with this part of your statement. If there was a Canadian who was delighted to import maniacs into Canada, he might be a psycho too or, a psychologist who was supposed to be benefited from such kind of importation. But there are some technical problem. Sometimes even a well-trained psychologist could also have problem to identify a man who has mental disease but without obvious symptoms, because most these guys look "normal" if their disease doesn't come on. For example, all immigrants were required to pass a medical examination to remove those who have serious disease such as cancer, but there still has some possibility that there are some guys who has already had a small tumor in their body but a CT or a MRI machine can not find out, so when they come to Canada, their tumor grow up and begin to take medicare before they make any contribution to Canada. Such situation is not the intent of Canada immigration policy, but it can be considered as an acceptable risk of the policy. Just as death by crash is not the intent of traveling by air, but when we aboard a airplane we are fully aware it has slight chance to crash down, and we do still travel by air. Let's go back Americanwoman's thread. What she suggested is essentially a reaction of the event. But before we adopt a reaction, two factors must be considered first. The first factor is feasibility. If we could mount a sorting machine on each buses's doors to sort out maniacs and criminals, it would be the best reaction to such cases. But unfortunately our scientists can not build such kind of machines, so the reaction would not be adopted. The second factor is that the reaction must match the action which triggers the reaction. Under this factor there are a lot of sub-factors must be considered. One of them is cost-effectiveness. For example, if there are a lot of psycho who like do such thing on buses, I think it is necessary to have a X-ray machine in each bus-stop to guarantee no knives aboard, or each passengers need to be offered with a bulletproof vest to keep their life safe. But considering Li-liked psycho are really rare, I don't think there might have a lot passengers who would carry pepper sprayers if they took buses. And what you suggested is also a kind of reaction, so the two factors would also need to be considered.

Thank you for you have such confidence on me. I'm very pleased by the comment for it kinda proved what I believe in---honesty, simplicity and patience are always the best way to weaken bias

I don't think his nationality results in his crime or insanity. I refered his nationality because someone asked if he could be sent back China (for reducing Canadian taxpayer's burden or let him face a death penalty? I'm not sure). Timeline to the Greyhound bus murder case But the newest reports say he has been Canada nationality since 2007. That means both Canada and China governments will treat him as a Canadian, and will not send him back or will not receive him to China. I also have such feeling. I have observed such economic-pressure or job-anticipating-frustration complication in some immigrants or those who applied immigrants in internet since I applied Canada immigration. There did have some reckless guys who simply think if they come to a developed country like Canada they will certainlly be guaranteed a good life so they did not do anything to prepare themself for the hardness ahead them. They only know a Canadan dishwasher can get a wage of $8/h, sounds very good to them for they can only get RMB 8 yuan/h in China, but they have nerver considered that a two bedrooms apartment only sells RMB 100,000 in their hometown but $200,000 in some Canadian cities, so when they really come, they have to face reality and feel frustrated. Ironically, these reckless guys usually have less ability to get more money in their hometown so they also have less money to support them to pass the hard initial stage as new immigrants, they may also have less ability to upgrade their profession to qualify a new job demand in a new country. These often make the situation worse. In some extreme situations, it might result in mental illness or anti-social behaviour.

Please allow me to add some additional explaination. Even if everyone were honorable, honest and reasonable guys who have totally agreed that discussions must based on fact, there might still exist tagging and generalization. I think it is because of how would we understand and adopt the "fact" or "truth" whitch supports our points of view. Though I think there might be only one truth or fact existed in the world by philosophical meaning, but people who have different culture, education and experience usually have different understanding, comprehension and observation of truth and fact. For example: If I said I believe that the sun revolves around the earth, I think all "honorable, honest and reasonable guys" here would disagree with me and would think I am a kid or an idiot. But if I have a time-turner to send me back to a medieval forum, I think all "honorable, honest and reasonable guys" there would agree with me and, if any "honorable, honest and reasonable guys" here dare to come with me to argue with them, I think being accused an idiot would be bettter for him, becasue he might probably be burned at the stake by those medieval "honorable, honest and reasonable guys". But filling up the gaps of understanding of the truth or the fact between different people who have different culture, education and experience is a hard task which may take a long long time, so tolerance is necessary---that means when we deeply believe in what we call the fact or the truth, we must also consider that what our "rivals" who deeply believe in may also be a part of truth or fact. If we could understand these, I think it might be helpful to us avoiding tagging or generalizing others and concentrating our statements on expression of what we believe in to convince others.

I totally agree your statement, and I think we can also criticize a country or a nation or a certain a group of people if the criticism is correct and just states the facts. But I have also read a lot of criticism which enlarged a individual or local events or cases of a nation or a country into whole nation or country. Such as, a American soldier killed a dog=American are very different from Canadian for they are all brutal war psycho; China let prisoners work=China is a slavery country and all its good are made in prison or slavery factories.... So I think everyone should distinguish whether the problems which he wants to criticize are belonged to an individual, a certain group of people or a nation. And even if what we criticize is a government we still must base our criticism on fact not on fiction of some writer's holy books whether the government is an elected government or a dictatorial government. For example: If some one says, "most chinese use pirate Windows in their computers." It is a criticism on a nation, but it is right for it is fact by statistics ; If he says,"all chinese use pirate Windows in their computers." It is also a criticism on a nation, but it is wrong for it is not fact; If he says, "xul uses pirate Windows in his computer." It is a criticism to a individual but it is wrong; If he says, "I know a chinese who uses pirate windows in his computer." It is also a criticism to a individual but it is probably right if we can trust the guy who says that. So, whom we criticize to is not important. It is important that whether our criticism is correct and based on fact.

If he was a legal Chinese, I mean he carrys a China passport not a Canada passport or other countries', Canada has the right to expel him back China whether he has been granted as a permanent immigrant. But it seems Li doesn't carry a China passport now. I read a newsletter from a HK media yeaterday which said the reporter had called China consulate in Winnipeg and they told him Canadian police had not informed them about the arrest of Li so far, so they though Li might carry other countries's passport for if he was Chinese nationality the police would inform China embassy at the first time, though his name shows he has Chinese bloodline.