kuzadd

hello wild bill. When I refer to talking heads, I am not necessarily limiting myself to political leaders, though they do qualify. here's a definition: talking head: can also refer to a person or persons (talking heads), whether on TV or elsewhere, who are given to excessive talking with little underlying thought or meaning. therefore when I say, those who associate themselves with the right, are manipulated by their talking heads, that is what I mean. Those talking heads comdemn everyone, from immigrants bad , unemployed lazy , liberals, teachers, etc., and for no realistic or rational reason. By using this simplistic rhetoric the talking heads free up anyone from actually thinking realistically about any given situation.

do you think if you gwb

if it's not the media, it teachers, it's immigrants, it's leftists, it's environmentalists, animal rights activists, etc., etc., why, it's how their manipulated, by their own talking heads.

you aren't giving me facts, your giving me fiction, and it is fiction that you believe. and when you say things such as this I thank-you for demonstrating your weakness and lack of knowledge, which causes you to resort to smear name-calling, smear/name-calling is always used by the weak.

were there lots of informants , how many? were they only watching for 6 plus months? suggestion, do some reading, read any of my previous posts for starters. this is one case I have followed, did you read the link provided, and check the sources, or do you just think you know it all?

you better keep up, it's highly , highly unlikely, and charges will be brought against these people again. they are entitled to counsel, as you or I are, since they are Canadians. 26 million pages of evidence? and they let these people off? simply not credible. They are doing this on purpose??? YOu have no clue about this case do you? It's actually been the crown that has been playing pussyfoot, under the desk. read here and check the sources provided: http://pennyforyourthoughts2.blogspot.com/...error-ring.html

of course not, when all you believe is rhetoric and stereotypes it's hard to take a dose of reality. perhaps it is best to recall this: there is nothing to fear, but, fear itself. or how about this one? Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country." Herman Goerring that means just make them afraid, and you can control them!

they were charged, but not convicted of anything at all. why? cause there wasn't any evidence after 2 years of surveillance? but actually there is even more to that one, then meets the eye, cause all charges were stayed against these men, previously, at the preliminary hearing. with two informants leading the show, one who was paid 370,000 dollars and one whom it is alleged was paid 4 million dollars. now that's tax money well spent.! Wajid Khan seems to be an opportunist, and Harper clearly wanted the opportunity he was offering. The people were held without conviction for 17 months in solitary confinement, many are claiming beatings and abuse. The law suits will commence. but, some of you were so scared, you jumped on the good ship "all muslims are terrorists" and sailed away without a thought! and that's the problem, no thinking!

i gotta chuckle, at this one , cause we look at the blog, and the writer makes the claim that ... then we go to the first source listed for the article; Jerusalem post http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid...icle%2FShowFull and the first sentence: Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas confirmed that plans to present two female Palestinian terrorists with a medal of honor have been withdrawn. Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas confirmed that plans to present two female Palestinian terrorists with a medal of honor have been withdrawn. which would appear to directly contradict the contention made. Or better to say is directly opposite of what the blogger stated. go further down in the article, at the Jerusalem post , it says revoked , withdrawn, whichever way you say it, means it ain't happening!!!! the second source listed says nothing at all about these alleged rewards? so is the blogger intentionally misleading, knowing most people rarely check the sources.?

I don't know, what do the laws of France say? I guess then , we know why she is being charged?

gosh she hates Canadian's also! I feel better now, that I too, am amongst her most hated! i like the analogy, like her career , good one!!!!

You know more know the way I "feel" then I know the way you feel. btw: that is kind of creepy get back to the facts and the topic at hand and don't put words in my mouth, nor assume you know my feelings. here's the facts 8 percent of the populations is muslim, therefore 92 percent is NOT ! the eight percent of the population are unempowered , largely impoverished, therefore it is not plausible they would be able to oppress the 92 percent. Leafless made a nonsensical aspersion wrt to the 8 percent being able "oppress" through terror. Not credible either nor statistically logical, see unempowered, and what percentage of the eight percent are actually involved in any sort of "terror" activities? give me some stats, please? Or all you have is aspersion, rhetoric, and hyperbole, which seems about right!

Gosh I never, ever said, that" Israel oppresses the arab world", could you back that up, or please not put words in my mouth. since you start out with a completely bogus statemtent wrt what I have ever said, I'll simply ignore the rest of your flawed argument. try again, and this time be accurate, k?

but eight percent are NOT terrorising. more rhetoric, no facts.

she can say whatever she wants, and so can I, get it? She seems to hate alot of people, muslims, gays, the unemployed, immigrants. But her rhetoric isn't born out by the facts. But hey if one prefers bullshit to reality fiction to facts , whatever floats your boat? she can lament the "Islamasation of France" along with every other fearmongering scapegoater, out there, but the stats don't bear that statement out. because: 8 percent of the population, particularily an unempowered 8 percent, can't oppress the 92 percent.

yes, let's promulgate sterotypes , instead of dealing with reality

My sentiments exactly!!!!!

she doesn't like the fact that as a religious tradition they slaughter sheep? Do you eat meat? then she wouldn't like you either. She doesn't like gays either. and one more thing eight percent of the population cannot oppress the other 92 percent, common sense dictates that one, the numbers ain't there, and they are not empowered. Bardot, seems to hate alot of people, meat eaters , gays and immigrants.

but were you scared? I'll bet you were? http://www.thestar.com/columnists/article/414859 let the lawsuits begin!!!! ADDENDUM: This was the Opening Post of the thread: The incredible shrinking terror case, or in other words, you've been duped now merged into the this previous thread.

From the Swiss report theres that pipeline you mention in your second paragraph quote. It's all about making money, and interests, it always is, so what is the problem? Besides Israel and Iran go way back, weapons, oil, helping the US to arm killers in Nicaraugua.

no the government should not build a dna data bank One word -democide. cause governments, throughout history kill more of their own people then all wars Rummel defines democide as "The murder of any person or people by a government, including genocide, politicide, and mass murder" democide rampant unchecked government power. Now with such history only the most foolish person would argue to arm the government with the further means to oppress a population.

what a clash fan???? what? my favourite clash song. Guns of Brixton- when they kick out your front door, how you gonna come? come on Angus? next line......................

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/771142.html The Paz energy company has struck a deal to refine fuels for the Palestinian Authority at its refinery in Ashdod, TheMarker has learned. This deal marks the first major business transaction between an Israeli firm and the Hamas-led Palestinian government. The Iranian connection Most of the crude oil for the PA will be imported from the Gulf states and Iran, which are expected to offer good terms. Diplomatic sources suggest an awkward situation could develop in the event that Israel asks for increased pressure on Iran at the same time that an Israeli refinery is processing crude oil from Iran. According to a source in the energy industry, "a refinery doesn't distinguish between crude sourced from Iran and from anywhere else, and crude from that type of source could be marketed in Israel." Therefore, not only is an Israeli company dealing with Iran for oil, which they are getting at "good terms" they are then supplying the "Hamas led Palestinian government". So one "boogey man" , no two "boogey men", but hey, there's money to be made! Interestingly, and a thought of my own, how much oil that Paz ( Israeli company) is getting for "good terms" is being sold elsewhere and not to Palestinians?

I don't know. What is Israel saying? anything , nothing?? if Iran , the government was unaware of this, wouldn't they deny as a matter of "saving face" , particularily to their own populace. Wouldn't it be correct to assume that this would not look good to the population of Israel either?

Leonard Cohen