obsidian

the reason why this isnt resolved is because theyre both the same thing, concerning afghanistan. the reason why drugs still remain to be available to North America is because we buy them to get the locals support for our movement to get an oil pipeline. but hey its illegal isnt it? yes it is illegal but has that ever made a difference? most of the cartels we know about, but remain untouched because we need their support. but in our own countries the users are penalized, how can we ever solve a problem without getting rid of the SOURCE. but why are the "users" penalized, its as simple as your 1st day in any economic class. supply and demand. we ban the production of trafficking within the country because it cuts into the int'l drug profits. in the iran-contra affair, aswell as vietnam, it is FACT that the cia knowingly did bussiness with and for indigenous druglords. the kerry commity report said that -the cia knowingly conducts bussiness with drug lords -had to have been involved and 7 years later after the iran-contra affair, we got an admission from the cia director that this was true. the bottom line is, we're ruining their country, and we need their support. so we buy it, appease them with the fiat money we use. the marijuana industry in BC alone is estimated to be make 6 billion a year. heroin costs more than weed, is addictive, and your customers either quit, or die in 3 years. imagine the profits and then it becomes feasible that we are actually using this. COCAINE IS WORTH MORE THAN GOLD, BY WEIGHT. heroin is worth more than oil, more than weed, and when these 2 drugs are illegal it makes profits soar even higher..

ok i posed two possibilities. either you were trying to dispell global warming or you were pointing out the blatantly obvious if you just wanted to bring this information to the people, congragulations. however, sorry to burst your bubble, but you're a little slow on finding this one out buddy. its not news. and you havent even taken a position in this debate, so inturn im attacking the article. not you, don't flatter yourself. and if you couldnt identify the PURPOSE of the article you were probably better off reading a hardy boy book. you say "Whatever gave you the idea that I was a believer in the myth of global warming?" um u realise thats not a definitive statement, it can go both ways...like a bisexual. do you believe it exist or not? you also say "So you offer no pointed rebuttal of the article itself." yes i did, everything i wrote pertains to this article. the article says in the last line: "However, problems can arise when R&D funding mechanisms inevitably "reward" exaggerated and alarming claims for the accuracy and implications of these models. " and thats the thesis of the article,if you couldnt see that. and thats what i dispelled. you say there is no room for rebuttal, but id like to see your rebuttal. and if you can't... you lose, i win.

was this supposed to be of value? i dont see how it is. its obvious you cannot be even 80% accurate predicting what will exactly happen when talking about our planets climate. there are too many variables, and lets not forget chaos theory. however if you posted this for support of the "no global warming theory" i think you have failed misserably. do you think they're predicting something so intricately complex that it can never be of value? because all scienctist do, regarding weather, is identify future trends. in all of their models they have predicted a warming trend, not that there will be a thunderstorm over toronto on june 27 2018...global warming is a TREND. and a warming trend forewarns of a climate shift, most likely resulting in unpredictable weather systems. this article says this is bad because it rewards developers of "green technology"...WOW. please never use this source again, the bias is apparent throughout. you really think its a bad thing that we're attempting to make sustainable technology? we'll have to sooner or later. even if global warming doesnt kill us because YOU think that it doesnt exist, we still will need "green technology". Populations are exponential curves. by 2050 the population is estimated to be around 10 billion people...if a radical climate shift we dont prepare for doesnt kill us, the worlds carcinogenic mutating pollution we dont prepare for will. OILOILOILOILOILOILOILOILOILOILOILOILOILOILOILOILOILOILOILOILOILOILOILOILOILOILOI OILOILOILOIL OIL IS THE ONLY REASON WHY YOU HEAR PEOPLE ATTACKING GLOBAL WARMING, IF YOU DONT BELIEVE ME DONT LISTEN TO THE TV GO ASK A F**CKING SCIENTIST. THEY DO NOT WHAT TO GIVE UP THEIR ENORMOUS PROFITS. WE'RE ADDICTED TO OIL, WE GO TO WAR FOR OIL, WE KILL FOR OIL. THE OIL DOENST BENEFIT US, THERE ARE ALTERNATIVE MEANS TO ALL OF THIS, THE OIL BENEFITS THE OIL BARRONS WHICH DONT CARE ABOUT THE PLANET, ONLY PROFIT AND POWER OILOILOILOILOILOILOILOILOILOILOILOILOILOILOILOILOILOILOILOILOILOILOILOILOILOILOI OILOILOILOIL thanks captain obvious if you posted this for some scientific purpose. to inform people that you can't forecast everything... and if you were trying to make a myth of global warming, you failed.

cdn blue i dont want this to be seen as flaming, but lets actually have a discussion. it involves input on both sides...you dont seem to be posting anything of sustenance, i just see you attempting to contradict people. not everyone is like you, and requires information to be in the proper format, citation, etc. just because you're to close minded to see past your media constructed world, doesn't mean thats all that exists. "Based on what, beyond what you have come across while under a drug induced trance." "What..." that's just slander man. actually prevent some facts, and dont IGNORE what i type... i support the same argument you tried to dispell, yet when i post it you dont say anything comments?

opium production is up 90% since the invasion (i have citation, not atm) almost all of the GDP of afghanistan is heroin. do you think these warlords make money designing clothes? farming? working as a lawyer? stealing everything they have? NO. they get nearly all of their income from opium, and inturn heroin. the largest market for ALL of the worlds drugs is the united states. the primary currency for international drug trafficking is the US dollar. this heroin will assuredly make its way into north america and we inadvertenely support these regimes. however all of these war lords who were at war for control of afganistan, were founded by the CIA to fight of the russian invasion of afghanistan. the us did this to "bleed the dragon". very much the same way the russians were doing in vietnam, supporting the north. and coincidentally enough the war in vietnam also included the trafficking of what? HEROIN. the heroin trade in vietnam was primarily to get support of the indifferent locals to fight against the communists. many observed how south vietnam "wasn't fighting their own war" while GI's went to Saigon or Hanoi on R&R they would see thousands of men 17-30 not fighting, obviously this was very troubling. you can see how economic security, the promise of buying of drugs, can sway the warlords and militias to fight for the cia cause. i was born in 1990 so im to young to have experienced the Iran-Contra scandal, but this was the same thing. the Kerry Commity Report found that the cia was "willingly conducting bussiness with convicted drug dealers", while informed the entire time of the situation aswell as "there could be no doubt they were involved themselves" look it up urself history repeats its self if we remain ignorant...

If any of you do the research (won’t be including citation yet) you will find that the CIA has been involved in numerous Black Operations. The CIA's role isn't just intelligence gathering, they are also used for black operations in which the US can't be held accountable, assassinations, coups, economic warfare, misinformation, provoking genocides, and for initially funding many terrorist organizations. However this is largely because of the American Publics unwillingness to sacrifice human lives for Pax Americana, or the neo-con doctrine of the Project for the New American Century. Americans cannot justify sacrificing lives for material commodities; whether it's gold, oil, COCAINE, or HEROIN. For the gov't to perform these "missions" they need to hide them from the American public, for fear of the non existent support they will get. Since 1947, and the creation of the National Security Act, the CIA spawned from this act have been waging these secret wars on the third world, forcing them to spread their legs and accept the inevitable raping by Corporate America. Documented Covert Wars Iran Guatemala Zaire Dominican Republic Indonesia Greece Chile Laos Cambodia Grenada El Salvador Nicaragua Afghanistan Iraq Vietnam It is essential for any country, especially a super power, to have a intelligence agency. But the CIA is far from only being a intelligence gathering community. They've sold weapons to Iran-Iraq, provoked wars, and killed millions of innocent civilians. The role of an intelligence agency is to prevent attacks and if not prevent, allow for the preparation of and most importantly national defense. However if you compare that to the current role of the CIA it drastically differs. The majority of the conflicts arise from leaders of certain countries trying to break free of US tyranny for the benefit of the country as a whole. A prime example of this can be found in an increasingly familiar country, that of Iraq. The British established Iraq as a mandate using military force. The British claimed this was because of fear of Nazi takeover or the possibility of the countries of {Baghdad, Mosul, and Basra} (modern day Iraq) to cut off oil to the west. The British then, with haste, gave power to the exiled King Faisal, any opposition would be crushed by the British army. The Hashemite rule lasted until 1958 when it was overthrown by a coup d'etat. The new gov’t threw out the Baghdad Pact and established friendly relations with the USSR. The US viewed this as very threatening, 5 years later there was an overthrow of the government organized by Colonel Abdul Salam Arif. Colonel Abdul Salam Arif was at first supportive of the Ba'ath Party (socialist) and then withdrew from the Ba'ath Party after he organized the coup and became president. Colonel Abdul Salam Arif was pro-US and abolished the past reforms of the prior governments. Suddam Hussein was next in line, when the gov’t was overthrown he became president of the Revolutionary Command Council. The CIA was usually the sole sponsor of the coups. Suddam reigned during the Iraq-Iran war and committed various human rights violations. In 1991 Kuwait was slant drilling into Iraqi territory, which is simply put, stealing. The CIA assured Kuwait and Iraq that they US would remain neutral, and the US began economic reforms within Iraq and sold arms to them. Yet when the Iraqis attacked, Bush Sr. said Iraq was poised to take over the whole Middle-East region and the threat must be neutralized. The truth is US, or any other country, would have reacted almost identically to the way Saddam had. Suddam was socialist and nationalized the Iraqi oil fields. This was a huge thorn in the sides of the US, France, and the UK who had previously controlled 95% of the regions oil. Bush Sr. jumped on this opportunity of public support to send troops into the region. During the war the US suffered only 150 fatalities while in Iraq more than 100,000 perished. This was a slanted war from the very beginning. The US used phosphorus weapons (incendiary rounds, banned by Geneva Convention) and mainly targeted the infrastructure of Iraq. The us bombed bridges, hospitals, food deposits, grain storage, water treatment plants, roads, etc. The US then exited Iraq and used their affluence on the UN to encourage economic sanctions. Since nearly all the infrastructure was destroyed Suddam Hussein could barely take care of his people. The US, in turn the UN, banned economic aid, financial aid, importation of food, and many more unjust and unnecessary sanctions. Among the "unjust and unnecessary sanction" the ban of water treatment materials are at the top of my list. After the Gulf War, and until recently, the leading cause of death in Iraq was diarrhea...solely caused by the imposed sanctions of the US. It is estimated that US economic sanctions are responsible for, conservatively, 500,000 deaths of innocent civilians. The US hoped that this would cause reforms in Iraq; they believed many would believe their propaganda, and that Saddam would be blamed for the situation and overthrown. However Suddam persevered, he established the oil for food program among many others attempts to benefit the country despite the sanctions. Suddam was to damn resilient, the people recognized how he had freed them from British, French, and American tyranny by nationalizing Iraqi oil. 10 years later Suddam was still in power, with no coup in sight, despite the sanctions, in despite of the western word. Iraq had not conformed and the US had had enough. The situation escalated 6 months prior to the invasion of Iraq when Saddam proposed and started selling oil in euros. This threatened the petrodollar which, if other countries followed suit, would end the hegemony of the petrodollar and instate the petroeuro as the dominant currency for oil transactions. THE US/CIA HAD ENOUGH OF IT. Now it wasn't only the corporate profits which they were longing for at stake, it was also the hegemony of the US dollar. The CIA fabricated evidence, fed it through Psyops which spread the message to the military, and fed it through Public Relations to the news agencies. Success. The Americans had been conned into a conflict over non-existent weapons of mass destruction, reinstating cold war fears, justifying defence spending. The Americans got what they wanted: 1) Control of the nationalized oil 2) Destruction of Government, destabilization 3) Intimidation to any other countries that may step out of line. The US made the Shi'a, Kurd’s, and Sunni’s fight in a civil war for power over the country. While at war the Iraqi's couldn’t worry about oil. Does it surprise you that the US and UK now own Iraqi oil? Does it surprise you that there's a bloodbath over oil? I'll tell you it doesn't surprise me anymore, its what I have come to expect of them. This is just one example of the numerous operations the US has been involved in without the consent of we the people, with no declaration of war. As I said before, intelligence gathering is crucial for national security, but is assure you that's not what it is used for. These countries posed no threat to the United States, they were all 3rd world. When we attacked Iraq in 2003 they were under 12 years of sanctions and could barely get clean water or medicine, let alone defend themselves. These actions result in the needless death of civilians so we can continue raping the world for its resources. Devaluing the people and the countries of the world for the benefit of whom? I don't think any of you own sweatshops, plantations, or oil companies; however most of our politicians are involved in one way or another. It is Corporate America who is seeking to gain from these atrocities. And frankly, they don't care about us either; they send us to war to die the same as they send us to war to kill. Give them the time and the place, and we're next on the cutting block. WAKE UP !

THEY MIDDLE EAST POSES NO THREAT. THE ONLY THREAT IS IF WE TAKE TOO MUCH OIL AND IT CAUSES OTHER NATIONS TO ACT. what could iraw have done to us what can iran do to us NOTHING. even if iran gets a nuke, there really is no liklihood of it being used, the only starategic use for ICBMS is to deter the use of them against the country trying to aquire them. hence why the us is threated by iran

i also know for a fact the chinese hackers can get on virtually any computer and access information. china has already militarized this field. chinas plan, if provoked, is to destroy our communictions and render them useless. feed misinformation. etc. they also have thousands of cruise missles stored in close proximity with their borders. i picture the next world war involving the anglo alliance + EU vs russia, china, s america, and the middle east. taking that into consideration i think there could be fighting on canadian soil. the us has always been worried about canadas vast north. a relatively small coalition force from russia and china could assemble in the north and push all the way to the american border with little or no resistance, bringing the war right to the americans.

wow bluehood you completely disregard 6 legitimate uses of cannabis by saying "Here's one burnouts, why should I have to take care of them. When you get burnt out like some of them they become a burden on society. " how about adressing any of my points, k thanks. and how about showing me proof they become a burden on society. and thanks for also assuming i use cannabis because i see the many uses of this plant. drugs are a bad thing for stupid people. stupid people who do not know how to interpet the nuances of psychedellics. when you can no longer physically evolve, the only thing left to evolve is the mind. you all think psilocybin and LSD makes you go crazy, think you're invincible, think you can fly etc. however almost all of this is propoganda. if any of you disagree with this, I STRONGLY ADVISE your experimentation with psychedellics. how can you will for something to be illegal you have never experienced. and believe me words can never do it justice. look at aldous huxeley, considered to be one of the most extraordinary minds of the 20th century, and he heavily experimented with mescalin and LSD. all these drugs do is remove filters in our brains that have been constrained upon us. how can a substance create an image? WE DONT EVEN KNOW.

WHA-WHAT!? rofl man do you have ears. he said "the fire department comander were not sure if they were going to be able to contain the fire. you know i said there had been such a loss of life, the best thing to do was pull it. and they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse" ok so lets get this straight, pull applies to "pulling the figher fighters from the building" why wouldn't he say that if that's what he actually meant, you dont think he could of redone the scene, or the interview if it wasn't what he meant? and when he says "they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse" we are to assume, using your logic, as soon as the firefighters left, the building collapsed, as they watched. and when he says "pull it" he actually means "evacuate the firefighters"...it just doesn't make sense. im interpetting this information litterally, and you distort it and put words in his mouth, like what many of you(possibly you) anti-conspiracy discredit conspiracy theorists for. extrapolating information. SEE YOU USE THE SAME TACTICS.

hey i dug this up just 4 u polynewbie... this link shows Larry Silverstein, owner of the WTC complex openly admitting that wtc 7 was "pulled". this is construction jargon for demolished. so here is a FACT, that wtc 7 was demolished. but this makes room for more questions that support the truth movement. 1. how could the explosives be planted, during a fire, and still demolish the building? 2. explosives take weeks to months so set up. therefore without prior knowledge of sept 11th, there is no way the explosive charges could of been laid. 3. he gives no reason for the demolition other than "there had already been alot fo death and destruction", let me remind you there was minimal fire damage, no reason to demolish a building. and the link the proof, it's the 2nd vid, the 1st one no longer works. this was taken from a PBS documentary. here is a video from a graduation ceremony at westpoint. wolfowitz is giving a speach and obsesses about pearl harbour and warns of "suprise attacks" 2 months before sept 11th.... and the site is http://prisonplanet.com/articles/february2...07wolfowitz.htm and if the buildings survived the initial impact, they had already absorbed all the kinetic energy. heat itself does not magically add mass to a building to make it collapse, it can weaken steal though. its also interesting to know the columns were covered with fire proofing, as are most. in 1945 a b-25 mitchel medium bomber flew into the empire state building, and resulted in only 14 deaths, and no collapse..obviuosly. wtc 1 and 2, aswell as almost ALL highrises in NYC are accomodated to survive a jet impact. wtc 1 & 2 were actually designed to wistand the impact of a larger plane...

wow you think the US and Canada have a "stellar" human rights?? look at the way we treat our natives, worst than almost every other country. and in the united states racism of all kinds is still rampant. canada is no longer the best place to live in the world, and the united states has always been far from it. yes there may be more executions there, but look at the amount of incarceration in the states. 1 million of the prisoners happen to be black. and how many cold blooded murders occur there? how many teenagers shoot up there classmates in shool? man you need to wake up, we dont live in paradise, you've just been conditioned to think we're the best. bankers dont discriminate between races anymore, they want everyone equally miserable. many polls show that people who live in 3rd world countries are actually, on average, happier then us north americans. yes i agree i like this materialistic way of life, who wouldnt, but it is DEFINETLY not sustainable. the monetary system is the underlying problem of almost everything. global hegemony would give them complete control. 1984 is getting ever so close. in londan they have 4 million cctv's, they are now being equipped with facial recognition systems. the EU proposes putting RDIF tags in currency, allowing for the monitoring of all transactions, destroying the appeal of cash. they already have RDIF in goodwrich tires, and gillette razors, and most likely many other products. the FDA has now approved the use of RDIF tags for humans. these are all basic human rights that will be infringed upon unless we do something.

putin has also been criticizing the us star wars program which has procured: THEL- tactical high energy laser, can shoot down multiple missles and mortars Airborn Laser- high powered laser possible of shooting down ICBM's Active Denial System-shoots microwaves which penetrate the skin and cause immense pain but no immediate damage. if they afjusted the frequency this could be used to essentially cook you from the inside out. Rafael's Trophy- A FORCE FIELD. all munitions carrying explosive charges detonate after passing through the created barrier. seems to me that russia and the rest of the world has some catching up to do. looks like another arms race. and it's not just russia who doesnt want the us to invade iran, china also agrees fully. there is a chinese-russian-irani pact..

ok you said to "elephants" im missing, being the bible, and the holocaust uh wasnt church supposed to be sepperated from state a LONG time ago? and whats the relevance, and please quote the scripture in the bible (you didnt even mention if new or old testament) that says the jews should what? own part of lebanon...? the only scripture that i know of that mentions the returning of the jews to the holy land is the book of revelation, which is talking about the apocolypse... and you said the holocaust. i agree the jews should be compensated for...BY GERMANY. how does it make sense to just steal it from another country.

even though its mainly a bussiness venture its scary to think that corporations and big bussiness can virtually rewrite borders, and history. eh not to scary, cant think of a time civilization hasn't been doing this...

Heroin and Cocaine should be make illegal. other drugs, not so much... consider the sources of heroin and cocaine. 100% of the cocaine comes from south and central america. 100% of the heroin comes from oversea's, and since we invaded afghanistan production has stepped up even higher. the US uses oil much like it does heroin and cocaine. Iraq:-Saddam Hussein was installed, oil is nationalized, iraq joins OPEC -the us pays cash for the oil -Hussein stays in power because he favor(ed)/s the USA's perrogative Peru:-drug dealers influence everything in the country, cocaine is it's largest export. -drug dealers make ALOT of money (USD's) keep in mind by weight, cocaine is worth more than gold -the drug cartels run everything, and support the US's perrogative as long as they have a market for their product and they make money -then the us tries to limit the supply of the cocaine (which they do with oil, diamond, gold, etc) which inturn created a higher demand and inturn a higher price. the same is true with heroin, a perfect example is afghanistan. the US uses this to rape the country. when the corrupt government is happy, they frankly don't care what happens to their people. asides from cocaine and heroins political misuses, they are also killers. they have the most severe addictions, and cause the most deaths. cocaine and heroin dull the senses, you do not gain a new enlightened oppinion, they do nothing positive. on the other hand psilocybin mushrooms and LSD cause drastic changes in thought patterns, new ways of looking at things, resolve to problems, spiritual experiences etc. i believe there was a obvious correlation between the peace movement and the use of psychedelics. AND CANNABIS IS A WHOLE DIFFERENT STORY the uses of cannabis -medicinal -recreational -as a food(seeds, hemp oil) -canvas -hemp paper -hemp ropes -hemp clothes -the oils from cannabis can be synthesized to create bio degradable plastics currently in BC alone the cannabis industry is estimated to be worth 6 billion. thats larger than the vast majority of all canadian industries. AND THAT IS JUST FROM THE SALE OF THE BUDS(flowers). imagine how much revenue could be created from this one plant. hemp creates 4x as much usable pulp to make paper than a forest of the same size. AND TREES TAKE 35 YEARS TO MATURE!!! cannabis is a true miracle plant, and remains illegal because of the enormous profit potential for....THE FARMER. imagine being able to produce and sell all of those materials from 1 plant, "you would be rich i tell you, RiCh!" not to mention the horrible slander they used to make marijuana illegal. there was no medical study before the ban of cannabis.

lol who said the mayan prophecy was about the end of the world? its about end-time, a transition to an enlightened state, the culmination of everything coming together on dec 21 2012 anyways... every generation has predicted doom, yet we are still here. i think life is much to durable for us to be able to destroy it in its entirety.

i dont think china will be to peaceful when 70% of there reserves liquidates into nothing. of chinas 1 trillion in reserves, 70% of them are in USD or US treasury loans. the bubble is about to burst, and the commodity bull market reign supreme. think of all the work china has done for us, and the united states. now consider how unbelievably angry they would be when they find out what they've been working for is either worth nothing or won't be paid to them? the us knows there dollar is bound to collapse, they have been doing this on purpose with disregard for everyone else. by devalueing the USD it forced other countries to lower their standards because the US was their largest market. they devalued the dollar by abondoning the bretton woods trade agreement, and allowing for unregulated market growth, the same thing that caused the great depression...but you may be pondering why they would do this, how does it make sense? it makes perfect sense when your military doctrine states that you must seize the worlds commodities. when cash is worth less, and during times of war, commodities are EVERYTHING. the us is creating a bull market for oil, gold, diamond, etc knowing that thats what they will and are fighting for. iraq, afghanistan, soon to be iran. worst of all this pins us against other countries in a world war situation. china gets about 90% + of its oil from iran. now just picture what would happen if the US invades iran; china would be angry because 1. their oil supply has been jeprodized, the sole reason for their success in the last 20 years. and, 2. because the US gets into even more debt and it would be impossible for the US to pay off their debt to china. and some of you act as if china doesn't have the worlds largest military. like 3 months ago china shot down a us sattelite...that seems to be either a CLEAR warning, or and act of war in itself now doesnt that get things rollin'

personally i can no longer stand tv. all it is is programing, this is good, this is bad, this is good, etc. worst of all is the commercials, don't the tv companies make enough money selling cable, let alone air time for commercials. and i can see the difference already, kids who have been brought up on tv don't think for themselves. they get there oppinions, not just the news, but all nearly all of their oppinions from tv. kids and most people now a days feel no need to seek information themselves. the worst thing about it is how it brainwashes children to be consumer who*es from the day they were born. tv is a way to brainwash people. they can control how often on average someone will see an image, what there oppinions will be, what they want, etc, etc. the one thing that pisses me off the most is the constant "iran is bad" on CNN. it is never a major story, just some random bs that ignorants take to be news. theyve been telling us iran is bad for atleast the last 3 years on CNN, how long until the invasion? just by mentioning iran is bad before iran ever acts affects the viewers oppinions. if any of you are interested i have several US military documents entailing the use of mass media as a force multiplier.

the middle east is a key geopolitical area, which happens to be predominantly muslim. wether jews, catholics, bhudists, muslims inhabited the area or not, we would still be there. if any of you have read any of Zbigniew Brzezinski books he has been predicting a conflict in that area for decades. he cited that this war was unlikely to occur if america was seen as the aggravators. in the project for the new american century it says "Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event-like a new Pearl Harbour". it seems that we're already well on our way to this war. for america to remain a super power it needs control of the worlds natural resources, and right now, they're fighting for 'em.

Im sure many of you are thinking "what the hell is this guy talking about?". Unfortunately im not just blowing smoke up your ass, all 3 countries have signed onto this proposal. Feel free to read up on it by searching the web for "Building a North American Community". This is proposed for 2010 people, i don't know too many people who would like to join the united states, and i know even less people who have even heard about this.

I have never really read that much into Israel, however there are a few concepts i grasp 1. Israel is a land mass besides Lebanon that was created a short time after WW2 (1948?) 2. Israel prior to this was not a country, the country itself was drawn on a map and given to the jews. 3. Not much consideration could have been given, this is the exact same as stealing land. How can you expect anything less than absolute hatred? Retaliation is almost guaranteed. 4. Lebanon is "ghetto", they have no high tech US backing. They may be terrorist, but it is the only effective way for them to wage any form of warfare. By our standards its barbabic, but if china just came and declared nova scotia a bhudist sanctuary, run independently by the bhudists we would surely retaliate and try to take back OUR land. 5. No consideration or reperations to the Lebanese for the land. Was it even paid for...? I'm positive im missing something, but this is my limited understanding of the situation. I don't want to offend anyone, but to me any attack on Israel by Lebanon appears to be justified. As for Lebanon being anti-semetic, I bet they would be anti-anyone who stole their land.

Bankers are at the top of the food chain. picture how much money your employer makes off you, then multiply that exponentially. and that is the kind of profit margin we are talking about, it all trickles down. if you disagree, im not sure of the exact numbers, but i believe in the US corporations get taxed alot less than the people. numerically speaking i think the american people pay 2-3 times as much in taxes as american corporations. HOW CAN THAT BE RIGHT. we're talking about multi billion dollar blue chip corporations that make more money, because they have more money. if you had the correct forecasting program and you plugged in the current trends you would find that the people are being robbed. there has been an dramatic escalation in the movement of money from the middleclass to the rich and super rich. the richest 400 people on the planet own more than the bottom 3 billion... and hey, if anything involves money, does it not also, by definition and reality, involve bankers? you said that the "politician's, oil companies, and car companies." were responsible for the death of the electric car. did you even bother to think WHY before stating that? it's because they would lose money. it's because the politicians political campaigns are paid for by the oil tycoons. the oil tycoons themselves, are almost as wealthy if not more than some of the bankers. they own a commodity, which as of now, all countries need to become industrialized and 1st nation. to power all modes of transportation. AND BEST OF ALL, IT'S EXAUSTABLE. you see oil is such a huge money making scheme and it wont be abandoned until it once again becomes profitable for the bankers to invest in something else. anywhere money applies, so do bankers.

the majority here cite islamic terrorism as our greatest threat, i find this very troubling and confusing. in the last century how many have they killed in N. America? no more than the casualties of 9/11 and maybe lets say 5... COME ON people they pose no threat to our infastructure as militants, or terrorists. they do pose an economic threat though...if most of the islamic states we think harbour terrorist stop trading oil with us, it would devestate us. and if you remember correctly, the US is in afghanistan because of "terrorism" and the US is in iraq because they want oil. most people dont even see the difference, or immediately assume they're corelated. THEY AREN'T. i do believe terrorists exist, and they could of possibly attacked the WTC's 1 & 2, but they couldn't of with out the US government knowing. there were multiple warnings, which the US ignored. and nearly all of the terrorists who were involved in 9/11 were already on a watch list, and used their proper identification to board the flights. this does not show how inadequate the system is, it shows how calous the government is. the truth of the matter is, if they were a big enough threat, they would be off the face of this planet. however, when used for fear mongering, they are essential to the propoganda machine that sends our sons and daughters over see's to die so we can pay $.80 a litre of gas IF WE'RE LUCKY! and also if you think about it we are all subserviant to the banker/elite agenda terrorism is part of the banker/elite agenda, or caused by it global warming is part of the banker/elite agenda, they caused it almost anything that is researched, or developed, gets the stamp of approval from some billionaire who chooses it because he knows he can make even more off of it and if you say they didnt cause global warming, or terrorism, the effects of the current monetary system indefinetly did. if electric cars were the same price as gas, would there be less pollution? OF COURSE. they decide what is profitable, and act upon it. and you can ask any economist this; when is the most money made? either during times of peace, or times of war? and the answer 100% of the time is war. for example look at all of our technology, most of it has just been made smaller over the last 60 years, and already existed. for the most part we're living off the carcass of technologies developed for and during WW2. the bankers fund both sides people, our death is their game...

this far from the 1st time anything like this has happened, but potentially this time it is the most volatile -we are experiencing more direct energy from the sun -the current position of the earth(rotational axis) allows for even more energy to be absorbed -we now have the highest co2 percentage ever recorded, which means an even greater green house effect this doesn't mean warmer temperatures, which the majority thinks. this rise in temperature interrupts and destroys the earths natural cycles. it will dramatically shift weather patterns making them nearly impossible to predict. global warming is far from turning the entire world into a tropical tourist destination. the desalination of the ocean alone would affect global temperatures. the earth, for the most part, is a closed system. where else did we think all this pollution and excess energy would go?