Jump to content

madmax

Member
  • Posts

    6,206
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by madmax

  1. Often in their own riding only. Liberal use of the term "content" if you ask me. It is a scam. These should be paid for by the CPC, not the tax payer. Your LPC MP doesn't send me partisan flyers. And do you receive on every 2, 3 and 5 days, and in multiples. I agree, call your LPC MP to complain. IF not that, then call the people whom you support and say, put a lid on it. You aren't the first Conservative to have that opinion. I spoke with some "reform era" pals of mine a week back to say I thought this to be a bit much, and they also didn't like what was being done, but believed it was effective and could give the CPC the edge. Then I received 5 flyers in a four day week.
  2. I have 37 saved up right now. The majority from Rob Anders which stopped coming about 3 months ago, and then all the others started coming in. I wouldn't bother sending them back. I will be handing them to the Local Candidate at the Next election. He will explain the value of these to the tax payer in a public setting. I should have 70 or 80 by the time of the election. The coffee shops talk doesn't have anyone saying, yeah I like these. I figure the numbers I get, will have been delivered to every household.
  3. Yup, that is what has finally got my attention. please clarify the bolded quote. It is abuse. Of course, the intent of my original post was to "REPORT ABUSE" :angry: If you get the irony.
  4. Every two weeks I receive 1 piece of literature from the Federal Government. These Mailings have NO information and is nothing but using the government resources to influence their electoral prospects. I have no problem receiving these flyers from the CPC. However, the TAXPAYER is paying to receive these pieces of XXXXXXXX PROPOGANDA and since I received 3 on TUESDAY and 2 MORE today, after close to a year of this nonsense I HAVE HAD ENOUGH!@! :angry: I am sure everyone knows the xxxxxxxx crap that is on these flyers. Vote for Check one HARPER, LAYTON, DION or MAY with an arrow pointing to Harper. Like I said, there isn't anything on these mailouts, they are pure propoganda bull. If you wanted to send something on the governments behalf, BEHAVE like a government and not a POLITICAL PARTY. Now I see a trend, that people in my area have noticed the increased number of these flyers, sent from Western MPs all with the same format. I have TWO WORDS for the CPC in this regards. XXXX XXX
  5. Short version LPC government is incompetent and unable to handle the manufacturing crises. http://netnewsledger.com/index.php?option=...5&Itemid=26 We are doomed
  6. Here are the parts that interest me If reputation is anything, I would put my bets with the firm McCarthy Tetrault.
  7. Here is an article on the Westmount By Election. This appears to support that there is a strong LPC vote in the riding. http://thesuburban.com/content.jsp?sid=139...mp;cnid=1016087 some highlights
  8. It sure does stick. Look from 2006 and you will see that Harpers rules his caucus in similar fashion. I am right, you are wrong, get with the program or get out. And when in the wrong, lie lie lie, deny deny deny and never give in and use/threaten litigation at every turn. It is a far different perspective then Chretian who managed to fool people and nothing stuck while he was in office. He maintained high polling numbers. They are stuck in the polls because of this attitude that isn't going to change and it will get worse if the CPC heads to a majority government. This is what the people don't want. It's getting close to becoming the TTP. Temper Tantrum Party. Unfortuneately these tactics haven't been one offs, but are standard fare for the CPC.
  9. Canvassing with a reporter is always a worry for a Candidate. Knocking on a strangers door and looking for a discussion or simply to say hello and drop of literature can lead to unexpected and sometimes very difficult engagements. That is why many events with the press are "stage managed". Even stage managed events can lead to undesired results. Particularly if you haven't been forthcoming with your appointed writer. Here is an article from Guelph. Not good for the CPC candidate who with over a decade of experience and high profile has been floundering since the start of the campaign. http://news.guelphmercury.com/News/article/364027 It's never the action, it is the white lie/denial that gets politicians in trouble.
  10. Yup burning brahswas a communist plot by Judy Rebick and her Trotskie associates. Imagine, them gathering, and then Rita comes out and Sings a Song. The Horror the Horror. http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/stor...?hub=TopStories
  11. How good are you in understanding defending oil pipelines = profit. What languages can you speak?
  12. Been there, done that and I still Got friends relatives active, and semi active (weekend warriors) whom are currently there. Would it be fair to say that the majority of those tours were in the 90s? That said, you might be interested in this. I think someone with your mindset would play a better role in putting pressure on the government. While it might be trite for a Liberal Senator to be speaking about increased military spending, it is the current government that is to answer for what is happening today. I have found a few bold talkers who want other people to do the heavy lifting. There is no/little sacrifice or contribution from the public or the "verbal" bigmouths for the conflict. I do not share your position on Afghanistan. I will not be reenlisting for that, although I can say, at times, it has crossed my mind for some strange reason, to enlist, go over, and engage in something I do not agree with. Some things don't change, you just do it.
  13. When are you signing up? Talk is cheap.
  14. Oh yes another American against the war in Afghanistan. But I doubt you are to the left of your fellow citizen. I don't think I will read quotes from you suggesting US foreign policy is soaked in blood. Regardless, I do recognise your comments to Army Guy as being respectful.
  15. Holy SHIT your a LEFT WING YANK!
  16. That's absurd. You have the right to question our military engagements. You can be a Canadian Citizen and not pay taxes and still question our military engagements. You can be of Voting Age and vote for a party that doesn't support various military engagements. You can be of any age and protest military engagements, freely in this country. Army Guy is well aware that I do not share his view that we are going to fix up Afghanistan, with the troop participation rate that we have. We could increase it 10* and the results will be the same. THe progress has been slow, stagnat and sometimes more regressive then positive considering how long we have been in the country. A country that has had no problem fighting, and defending its turf, has problems supporting its own government, and quite frankly, we do not trust the Afghan Army. If you cannot train an army in SEVEN YEARS to defend its government, you will be unlikely to ever be able to accomplish such a mission. It is folley. A new direction must be found. But to suggest that military excursions require 100% approval of the tax payer is pure nonsense.
  17. I have yet to pay for an item with cash, and have someone force me to fill out their "questionaires" at the cash. Sometimes the cashier doesn't know what to do when I will not give them any information. I am speaking about just getting toilet paper or toothpaste, not fertilizer and gas if you get my drift. Here is the monies, you do not get my name phone number and address or email address. Sometimes its ok, others not ok. There is sometimes a puzzled look on the face, especially if the cashier is younger. They don't think there could ever be a problem with giving out this information. Ballots, eh, hmm. I will keep that in mind.
  18. Which CPC MPs wish to be summoned? How many CPC MPs are tied to the In and Out Scheme? I would think that they all should testify. I also think that the CPC MPs who choose not to engage in the scam should be allow to speak. What is the point of not having those involved speak?
  19. This could go into the Green SHift Debate, or into the By Elections. I didn't know politicians talked like this anymore in Ontario. Certainly not those scripted answers you get from a Candidate. Regardless, it appears that this is a multi party race with the LPC candidate laying low and hoping his name carries him within the community. Long ways to the end, but I believe the CPC candidate will get past her mistake with regards to sticking to script and downplaying the Truscott question. As of now, more people think ST. Lambert is up for grabs, then previous results might indicate. And Westmount looks to be a Liberal Lock even in previous results and our own straw poll. Just another bump to the thread until election day.
  20. Well that is bad and good timing. Good in that it is after the By Elections. Bad in that it is before the General Elections. It just isn't going to show well, and will discourage more people from voting.
  21. The thought that "Burning a bra" was reason to spy. I remember as a young lad being all for it, at the time. But then again my motives probably weren't the same as either the Feminist Movement or the RCMP. Clearly the RCMP were concerned about Bra manufacturers losing valuable business. A communist plot to destroy western manufacturing, no less. Or may when they heard about that New Bra that "lifts and separates" it was about Quebec, and they needed to find out what the position of the Feminists was towards the FLQ? All very bad jokes aside, I just can't under any circumstances view Rita MacNeil as a threat to National Security. Very different era indeed.
  22. I said I certainly will. Did you just tell me you were in favour of Dions Plan or Not? regardless I apologise for projecting that you were for the NB Tax Shift and Against the Dion Tax shift.
  23. Sorry, I read this article, and while not really funny, I couldn't help but laugh. http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2008/08/04/...-womenslib.html Rita MacNeil Threat to Canadian values?
  24. It may be coming. Clarify this for me. You Support Dion and his Green Shift Platform. Yes or No? A simple YES and I will retract, clarify and apologies for suggesting that you are both for and against a Tax/green Shift Stratetgy. I will not project what you "think". You have the opportunity to do so yourself.
×
×
  • Create New...