White Doors

I see, so all murderers are really sick. They are the victims here? It's society's fault that we didn't treat them nice enough and they went and killed someone. tsk tsk on society I suppose. You really don't have much of a grasp on the human animal, do you?

A girl of 14 is still a dependant, ergo, they have no say. that's the point of the legislation. sorry if it was over your head there. They don't have the 'right' to make that decision.

Post an intelligent reply and you may get one. We aren't wikipedia here, you can post an opinion with what YOU think pacifism is. Go on now, you are a big boy. Time to take the training wheels off.

Funny, but I think that you would be hard pressed to find even one veteran of WW2 who would agree that the mission in Afghanistan is disrespectful to what they did. In fact, I think you would find that they are some of the most ardent supporters of the war. Or you could always go into a local legion and ask them if they are ashamed, but I wouldn't recommend it. If YOU are ashamed, say so. Don't project your feelings on others.

I disagree. You vote in the party/person that best meets your values on all things in life and let them take the lead. You give them their report card at the next election. The people we elect need to be leaders. The public can't always know all of the intricacies of everything. 'grass roots' leadership is a pipe dream and not a realistic one at that. Kind of sounds like communism to me.

to be fair, I wouldn't want that nutbar in my party either. He would get torn to shreds in question period.

I see, so it is safe for a 14 year old to cavort with a 40 year old pervert? You think that would be an equal relationship? No Chances of exploitation going on there eh? Do you think murder is morally repugnant? The conservatives do and have laws against it. fascists eh?

So you think it should be legal for a 40 year old man to have sex with a 14 year old girl? Please clarify? perhaps you would feel better if there were no age of consent rules at all?

No one said that so stop making things up. I'm also not a social conservative. If the NDP were really for protecting the individual rights of the children, why did they vote AGAINST the changing of the age of consent? You don't know or don't care?

Yes, they are even in favour of being nice to pedophiles. After all, what goes on in the nation's bedrooms isn't the governments business. How progressive is that? let's de-criminalize pedophilia. poor fella's getting a criminal record and all? NDP campaign slogan circa 2020? August, they aren't championing individual rights at all. They are championing small groups of PC people. Big difference. If they really cared about individual rights they would also be against the gun registry.

well even that is much better. heck, if it was 50/50 from the viewers and the punlic I'd be happy. Either way, make it better at the very least.

Agreed 100% PBS is 10x the channel cbc is and that is all privately funded.

Can't stand jack Layton. a big bag of hot air. Liberals: Colin Kenney. Frank McKenna NDP: Ed Broadbent Bloc: Gilles Duceppe CPC: Harper, Prentice

You asked for the evidence and you got it. don't dismiss what you yourself asked for.

This winter is starting to feel like it!

eh? Weren't you guys Russia's bitch for a few hundred years? Hell, I think you were even Poland's bitch at one point. Warlordish soul? tee hee. Your warlordish soul got you through the welfare line ups to get you yer cheque eh? Had to slay your enemies to get back to mommy's teet? hahaha

Please, this is partisan clap-trap as are all of your postings. I bet you have a picture of Harper on your dartboard. Just to be clear, what you really want is confiscate guns. Licensing people to handle weapons with our PAL is the way to go. registering the actual weapon is silly and a waste of money. Tougher setences on gang-bangers would help too. the rest is just feel-good BS that does nothing.

Where's Borg when you need him?

You said that you are not a lawyer. You said that you were not offended by Mr. Steyn's words. Then you say that they are worthy of 'investigation'? No prosecutor is investigating him for hate speech, quite simply because what he said is not. The Tribunals clearly have no jurisdiction to hear these 'complaints' so tell me again why you think his comments are worthy of investigation? Please, in detail. tell us all.

THICK

me too!

That's it damnit. I'm doing it. I really AM going to buy some stock in Alcan. How's the price Morris?

Man, do you even read what you post? There is no law that they are ruling on here unless you think Mr Steyn was blocking someone's employment or right to rent an apartment. There is no ruling on 'law' here. Just a complaint because someone doesn't like what someone else says. Hate speech does not cover that and neither are these tribunals supposed to cover it, according to your own quote. So if you still refuse to see where the issue here, then that is saying alot about you. You are choosing your PC status over the law. Plain and simple.

Yes, if he asked people to commit violence against a visable minority, that would be hate speech and THAT would be handled in the courts, not some 'human rights tribunals'. what a crock. No, you are not a lawyer and neither are the people at the human rights commissions. If they are so sure that it is hate speech why not go to a federal prosecutor and help them build a case and bring it to COURT? This is not court, this is a kangaroo court and the CIC knows this. This complaint isn't going to the courts Hardner, or did you not only NOT read the book but you haven't even read about the issue? No COURT is deciding here, it is a TRIBUNAL. That is the whole freaking issue. You can't see the issue because you are too busy twisting yourself into a pretzel trying to be the most PC person on the board. THINK

WWI was foreign policy and Vimy Ridge was our greatest achievement in that war. Not a stretch in my opinion.