White Doors

You and BC chick are the only one's who sound 'afraid' on this thread. Often you are afraid of things that only you two can see. Not unlike a child with a fear of monsters in the closet.

So you believe Hitler and Churchill were moral equivelants? Please elaborate, thanks!

Interesting, so if there were no Jews in America you think the policies towards Iran would be different? Or do you think that teh Jewish owned media would keep it on the front burner anyways?

Jim Harris? The former leader of the Green party? Hello?

cite?

And the best way to conserve it is to let it be priced by world standards. It will encourage innovation in other fields as it becomes more expensive. You want conservation AND cheap prices.... Why is it that left wingers always swim against the current?

Exactly!

And you find joy in this? Why?

So there are still Jews in Gaza? They didn't dismantle the settlements there? You think Israel searching gaza bound ships for weapons is ample pretext for hamas to launch missles at israel hoping to hit a school? Interesting!

you think Jews make bad citizens of countries that aren't predominately jewish? Aren't you answering your own question here in an anti-semetic way?

exactly. He sought to deflect from what I said, but he proved my very hypothesis of him by saying that. lol Well at least it;s not hard to see through poor arguments.

Ahhh.. nicely veiled shot at the jews! nice!

No, not anymore. When Harris was their leader, that was true, but now they are somewhere left of Chavez.

But the truth is, you and your ilk do not hope that. You hope it is a failure at the same time I know you hope that more Canadians do not die. You are fervant in both of your convictions, but please be honest with yourself, you and Myata really do hope that it fails. So you can tut tut and have your "I told you so's" (except even on the far left, no one was against the UN sanctioned Afghanistan mission at first - but this wouldn't be the first time hypocricy was conveniently ignored by the far left - see the biggest argument for not going to Iraq "But there is no UN sanction to do so wahhhh"...) Very good article in MacLeans this week about the progress in Afghanistan. Recommended reading armyguy. Some reporters get it.

This Canuck takes comfort in it!

If that is true, then perhaps you can explain the actions of hamas in gaza since Israel left? thanks!

I sure hope so! Can't wait to see Dion bumble hiw way through a campaign! LOL

I agree! Make love not war. Bring the troops home and we will have campfires and sing songs. What a glorious world it would be if we would just leave people alone. Ahhhh....

anyone can find any number of descriptive comments wrt anyone, "right" "left " or otherwise.

LOL

The farming subsidizes that farmers get from governments now will be come unnecessary when the produce they make becomes sufficiently profitable on it's own. They are unlikely to continue on inn their current form as we continue down this road of pricing food as a more valuable commodity, as it should be. Look at the oilsands in Alberta for an example, they increased the royalty rates when the commodity became more lucrative.

Good. I'm glad we won't send as much aid (assuming you are correct). The west assuaging their guilt and sending handouts has done more to keep the 3rd world poor than anything else. We may feel better about it, but it hasn't changed anything. My line of thinking not only reflects reality, it IS reality. That reality is the market forces at work. When poor people are given the tools to take themselves out of poverty, it works. ie: micro credit loans, see nobel prizes. When governments and large agencies give it away for nothing it encourages corruption and inefficiencies and does not provide an incentive or a means for the poor to better themselves, they merely become dependant and their handlers corrupt. Giving 'aid' to poor countries is what we do to make ourselves feel good, but THAT is what doesn't reflect reality. I think you need to spend some more time thinking about this subject before you tell someone that their views don't reflect reality. ps: neither is my point well intentioned, just verbalizing the facts and explaining how the results may be the exact opposite of 'the sky is falling' that so often makes the front page but has little to do with the reality you speak of.

I don't agree. i think the adjustments may be difficult, but I think higher priced foods are really a win win. Food should be more expensive. Think about it. The markets are going to do by themselves what endless rounds of WTO trade discussions couldn't - make 3rd world food producers competitive. This will in fact lift alot of people out of poverty. What do the poorest of the poor do in the world? They try to produce food to eat. If the produce that they are making become more valuable? Guess what? They aren't so poor anymore. The adjustments will be painful perhaps (this in large part is more to do with the fact the Europe subsidizes their farmers a way too much more than anything). The adjustments will invariably lead to Europe, the USA and then Canada reducing subsidies to domestic operations. Why? Because they won't need them anymore and the voting public will start to demand lower food prices. Why in that order? Because Europe subsidizes their farmers the most followed by the US and followed again by Canada. This is a good news story, chicken littles, notwithstanding.

Sheesh, personality plus. the guy has the charisma of drift wood.

Racist Pig!