I agree and nor did I say it did that I can see. I may have not been clear. It opened up the distinct possibility of private providers providing healthcare outside of the public system.
fair?
Hey
Don't get upset at me. The Liberals are the one's with the history of letting holocause deniers in their party.
And even let them run for the leadership of their party!
haha
them's the facts.
you are the one twisting them around.
Ah divert from the point and attack the poster. Such an immature response, really....
I would suggest that you take to Canadian History. Long before us white guys arrived here the injuns had vast trade networks from South America to the Arctic. And in fact according to archaeological records that included the trading of metals and finished metal products more than 3000 years before we (our ancestors) discovered metal working in Europe. Us white guys weren't half as advanced as the natives at the same time.
haha
You know that they have found 'white' DNA in 'natives' right? Europeans were here 13,000 years ago according to DNA records.
Indeed, if you can answer this then you have your answer:
"If we lock up murderers for committing crimes then why are there still murders?"
see how dumb your question is?
I doubt you do, but I know others will.
Holy cow! wrong again!
In fact, under the charter, it was ruled that governments cannot make people wait for timely service for healthcare and in effect, made private health care legal in Canada.
THAT was a precedent.
strike 3 - you're out!
Yes, according to your judgement Canadian soldiers are a bunch of murderers aren't they.
Here is the poll that refutes yoru scurious claims:
http://65.109.167.118/pipa/articles/home_p...nt=155&lb=hmpg1
and most telling especially considering your oft repeated slurs of Karzai:
Don't you get tired of being wrong all the time?
The defeat of Hitler brought peace. The defeat of Napoleon brought peace. The defeat of the french in North America brought peace. The defeat of Carthage brought peace.
I have many more if you wish.
yes what you didn't 'miss' you got completely wrong.
my god.
Go do some research and then come re-read this and laugh at yourself for being so uneducated about the issue. painful.
New Brunswick next up?
I fail to see the precendent setting ruling here. The judge ruled that the Quebec health act says that they should be covered. They can simply pass a law to say it does not if they so wish.
She was not ruling on a Charter issue. Also, last I heard New Brunswick has a different health act that Quebec. Why? They are different provinces.
No precendent here despite your claims.