White Doors

http://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2007/02/27/c...ack-070227.html haha You must be licking your chops. Tell me, if the Taliban had killed Cheney (for the records they didn't even come close) would you think that to be a good thing? IOW, Do you think Cheney deserves to die?

I wasn't aware we were trying to conquer the place. What else would you call it? We are there occupying against the will of Afghans, excluding the Karzi puppet regime, we are trying to force them to conform to western ideology? And we are conductiing ourselves outside the framework of the Geneva Convention and International Law. One whole sentence of far left lunacy and all of it verifiably false. 1) All polls conducted in Afghanistan show that the majority of the populace wants us there. 2) We are according all Taliban and AlQuada prisioners 'rights' under the geneva convention even though we are under no obligation to do so as they are not POW under the rules of the geneve convention. In short, we are going above and beyond in according 'rights' to these terrorists. 3) International Law? This is a UN mandated mission. What Internaitonal law are we breaking here? (Oh, please stick to reality not fantasy in your response) haha thanks for coming out!

Paul said I could post it here. thanks

yay! more rectum talk!

thanks for your insightful(?) input!

ok then.....

More rectum ideas please!!

a 200 million hospital? would be very small.

Doesn't Rush Limbaugh make the same childish claim about "social progressives". I actually think quite a few CPC supporters would support the Green Party instead of the Liberal's or the NDP. I would have before they changed to May. She seems of the same bent as Layton and Suzuki.

Well gee, you sure convinced me!

I SO hear ya!

Hi Baylee!!

Are you baylee?

Definitely baylee

Your claim, your burden. Reverse onus of proof is classic conspiracy theory MO. Congrats.

Or so you would liek to believe. That does not make it fact. Sorry.

I don't know how conservative a judge Harper has to appoint to determine that locking people up without telling them why or charging them with anything does not violate the Charter. This very telling as to why the 2 sunset clauses need to be sunset, as they are dealing with this very thing. Being held, without charges, not knowing why, but yet being compelled to provide evidence that you did something wrong. It would seem that Harper is all about wanting to violate the Charter buy his support of the 2 clauses that violate; the Charter and International Laws and rights, and indeed common sense. You make this to be a partisan issue? Hello, the liberals passed this law.... Do you not have any shame with your lies and partisanship? Are you a paid member of the liberal party? Also, the Liberal SENATE recommended that it be extended too. You are nothing but a HACK.

Yes, it's called a commonwealth Nation. We have the british parliamentary system. If we are not a nation nor is the UK or India etc etc. You are either confused or purposefully being obtuse.

Canada is a federation. It is legally a Nation. If Canada is not Nation then no country on earth is. Canada also has jurisdiction on ALL treaty nations. No treaty nations can enact laws that contravene federal laws. It's quite simple really.

Treaty Indian or Metis "nations" are not sovereign or 'Nations' in any legal regards. fact.

Churchill also said he would fight on the side of satan against hitler when asked of his about-face on relations with the USSR. He was no friend of communism.

Well I like my mother in law.

Meanwhile he is gallavanting around the country in one of those huge tour busses that rockstars use. beds and all (even though they stay in hotels every night). it is diesel too. Get's about 8mpg. awesome!

Libertarian

Aww... It's posts like this that make me miss baylee.