Rue

No I think anyone who reads what you have to say knows its caused by in-breeding.

Nothing to do with the thread,

Your brilliant contribution as usual has nothing to do with the thread.

That makes no sense. Whether email works or not as an education tool is not predicated on forcing people to use it but on its inherent qualities if it has them. If you think locking children at home in isolation in front of a tv screen is a good idea can I suggest it may not be and leave it at that. We already are bringing up a generation of brain dead, anti-social misfits.

There you go a perfect example of using one's intelligence, being rational, using common sense. Excuse me if I vomit buckets of annoyance.

You don't stop a virus by closing a port. Please give it some thought.

Exactly...so to run it as oh we need to panic thread is horseshit.

Oh he sure has. He's gonna hide under his bed until it blows over. Can some of you get a handle on your anxiety. So you are afraid of a virus. You can't see it, smell it, hear it, control it. Its the invisible boogy man so if you stock up on toilet paper and noodles and sodium glutamate, msg and salt and hide in your home, presto the bogyman will passover. Why don't you also smeer a lamb's blood on your front door while you are at it so your first born won't die. Where do y'all want to go with these threads anyways? The public schools are closed for two weeks for now. Its because many children are not supervised at home washing their hands, may travel during the break. and when they return they could spread any kind of virus including this one. Its a pre-caution. It doesn't mean you run it like some panic headline and piss your pants. It means we take common sense measures. This is not the first outbreak of a virus. What is the matter with some of you? Are you really that sheltered?

The Boogy man will not go away if you hide in your home. Its not how viruses work or spread. Try start with educating yourself on what a virus is, how they are all around you and they don't just magically go away because you stay at home.

Unless you are brocoli then you take it personally when people begin eating you,. Get a hold of your petunias people. Hoarding toilet paper and macaroni and cheese...really? The media and many people are to blame for group hysteria. There is educated awareness and there is stupid counter-productive hysteria. Its your choice whether to panic or use common sense and wash your phacking hands and relax. Hiding from life, fearing life, imagining viruses killing you is all bullshit. For phack's sake. This country had far worse with polio. We have had Sars, Legionaire's disease, AIDS, Spanish flue, Avian flu, swine flu, flus and viruses since the homo sapiens species existed and began shitting in his/her own water supply. Ignorance of illness will not help a damn thing. 10% of people who get it will not die from it. Bullshit. Oh maybe we should panic. Maybe we should send all kinds of emails hyping this...thanks but phack off. Its simply attention getting hysteria for a generation tin the first world who have never had anything threaten them and now feeling an invisible boogy man for the first time is gonna get em. You think people in the 3rd and 4th world who die from diaheria are sitting around like some of you wetting themselves out of fear? Get real man. This virus panic is a classic example of sheltered affluent people struggling with a phenomena most of the world lives with as a fact, of life. So I am actually fed up with the number of fearful sheep I hear. No I will not jump on any bandwagon of fear as some of you seem to be asking. I also expect the usual to come on here and blame it on immigrants or yellow skinned bastards, etc. I just had some lady lecture me not to walk 6 feet near her or touch doors as I was entering a building this a.m. She read it on the internet,. Just so you know, I have tuberculosis, leprosy, bubonic plague, std's, rabies, aids, mumps, measles, small pox, diptheria, German measles(oh its from those Germans) whooping cough, scabies, lice, syphilis, hepititis a,b.c, herpes (all 12 complexes of them), impitago, cholera, typhus, typhoid fever, ebola and whatever it is zombies get and Woody Harelson kills. Ok? Now kiss me.

Mee I jhust lyk to poynt out dee obveeus. Dam strayt. Do me a favour Taxme save your shit for someone else. Do I look like I would take anything you say on this forum as credible?

But does he boil his meat is the question. I am not sure but I think some Christians have a problem with him using their religion as he did and now does again. Not a role model. I prefr Besty as my role model. Or you. Oh my God. I think I am starting a cult for you guys.

Yes but not because of their skin colour but because of their not being part of their ancestry or traditions. I do not mean so get into a semantic argument with you at all. The poiint I am trying to make is is the same one we Jews do when we explain Zionism. We do not define our collective as a race any more than gays do with their collective or aboriginals do with their collective. Its not something I meant to argue in the sense that the above does not happen. It does. Also the point is no we can not go backwards and uninvent Canada . I agree with your point dwelling on the past not to make changes is pointless. Some aboriginal leaders are in denial, others are realistic and pragmatic, some are trying to find a balance between their traditions and our current Western technological ways. You all know that. I just think we sometimes misstate their collective identity as one based on race. It never was. That's a European concept invented by aEuropean to subjectively describe what people looked like based on secondary genetic characteristics such as lip size, nose shape, hair texture, amount of melanin in the skin. Its been proven scientifically absurd by what we know today about genetics and native peoples in Canada did not use it. Why would they? Also I can not speak for native peoples but someone for the sake of debate as I have, has raised the response. You'd have to ask native peoples how they define themselves. I don't myself define them by nose size or skin colour. I define them by their traditions/customs as they have asked me to. Lol you would no doubt call it being politically correct. No just I hate being referred to as a race-I know how that feels. I do not define you by your race. I define you by our individual opinions. You are Argus to me not someone white guy even if you are an albino.

I like some Christians. Some of my best friends have been Christian. I just do not understand what it is they have this need to play golf all the time or out mayonaise on everything or by Buicks. Also I do not understand why they thought Bob Hope or Bob Newhart or anyone with the name Bob was or is funny. Other then that they are usually o.k. unless they insist on boiling meat. Then I have to draw the line. Unless its a steamie from Montreal, you can not do that.

True. Its probably a false rumour like everything else all kidding aside.

If you are desperate burn one of those candles from Gwyneth Paltrow that smell like her you know what. It supposedly purifies the room. Oh tell me the world is not insane.

I blame people who eat bats. Shame. Bats are good. They eat mosquitoes.

Yah it does. A small part of a larger thing is just what some call humility . Egos man. They make some people very driven and successful and others delusional based on the same words they suck out of a religious book or work. I get why people are fed up with fundamentalist rigid religions I truly do starting with me but I also think we get as fundamental and rigid in our opposition to fundamentalism and extremism. It is what it is. Extremism can incite extreme reaction. which is what many extremists of course want- polarized conflict. Knowing when to ignore a target or having to take it out aint a decision that comes lightly.

The above idea was not and is not an aboriginal concept. It comes from people like you projecting it on aboriginals.

There is an actual difference. Aboriginals do not ethnically cleanse people who do not look like them. Not that you noticed by aboriginals do not "look like each other". They are a mix of many mixes. If they wanted to define access to land by looks they would have had far more many wars than we people who came after them before we got here. You also need to see why and when aboriginals pushed back to demand access to land. It wasn't until their access was restricted in the first place. Then they pushed back. No we can not go backwards and undo history but we need to stop misstating history as if they started the displacement process. They did not. They only reacted to being displaced. They did not institute any displacement of non aboriginals until we pushed them off land. You push something it pushes back. The misstating of history does not resolve it..it only further complicates it.

Nothing some prune juice can not fix. He's just irregular. Seriously though he looked like he was robot clone. Maybe they drugged him.

Please do not tell me to get my priorities straight. You need to read what you write. Each time he writes, each time he speaks, those are actions. His language has direct cause and effect. Of course we focus on what he says its public domain and it immediately causes reactions. If you can't understand that you need to get your head straight. Think about what you wrote. If people ignore what he said and only paid attention to his "actual" actions what would that mean? You even have the faintest idea what that means. What is an "actual action". Is communicating on twitter an "actual action" or in your world is it to be ignored. When he makes a speech, is that an "actual action" or is that to be ignored? You need to get real Y really.

Now you engage in semantics. Your statement is as stupid and makes the same generalization.

Aboriginals within their own laws do not define themselves as a race. They define themselves a collective of collectives based on common ancestry, i.e., origins and those origins are based on traditions that are followed. They also do not define themselves as owning property. Their concepts deal with collective rights associated with accessing land not owning it. It is Canadian non aboriginal laws that have used the concept of race or title to property and still might directly or indirectly. In fact I doubt you will find any aboriginal community leader use the term race as we have to define themselves or use the world title as we do in Canadian laws when it comes to property. I would love to see the terms used that way by them. I have never seen it yet. By the way the need to accessuse of land was not predicated by aboriginals-it only became an issue because of the French and British initiating it first causing initial limitation to access on aboriginals based on defining them as a race. The aboriginals realized that while French and English were both albino like compared to them, they were not of the same cultures. They defined them by their behaviour amd language and customs more than they did their albino features. Aboriginals did have albinos you know. All life with spinal cords tend to have them.

You stated: "I wonder if you all actually care, or if you're just drooling over the drama. I'm guessing the latter for most part. " I know what you wrote. Maybe for someone so specific with everyone else with your questioning you might want to write more clearly. That said please understand I was not drooling or looking for drama in my previous response to you. I am under the impression you were summarily dismissing the concerns or opinions of others. Now me I leak I don't drool. I can give you a medical report on the fluids if you want. Salaam.