Jump to content
A Note on Topic Titles – Be Clear & Descriptive!

betsy

Senior Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    16,661

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    36

 Content Type 

Everything posted by betsy

  1. betsy
    Even Stormy Daniel's lawyer is coming to the rescue of Ford! https://www.businessinsider.com/michael-avenatti-brett-kavanaugh-2018-9 Ford's claim sorta contradicts Avenatti's, doesn't it? According to Ford, Judge and Kavanaugh were already drunk when they got to the party. No mention of them bringing the booze. There was also no mention of drugs. She also said, Judge was at some point telling Kavanaugh to stop - and actually distracted Kavanaugh when he rough-housed with him - giving an opportunity for Ford to lock herself in the bathroom. The two got distracted and went away - two boys who are drunk, and unfocused. The incident doesn't fit the description of a would-be gang-rape. Judge doesn't fit the characterization of Avenatti, as being into gang rapes.
  2. betsy
    Now that they see Ford isn't effective to sink down Kavanaugh - they've brought out another one! The Six Days Of Deborah Ramirez https://www.theamericanconservative.com/dreher/six-days-of-deborah-ramirez-kavanaugh/ Lol. This one's even really drunk! I feel so sorry for Kavanaugh, and his family.
  3. betsy
    Read my response! That's my answer to your irrelevant question! You don't like his method of streamlining - well, I do! You're missing the logic here. Everything is explained in my last post to you. You're the one being petulant. I don't have any obligation to debate with your irrelevant - and illogical - views. Plus, you're now resorting to personal attacks - which is typical to people like you. You didn't vote for him - I did!
  4. betsy

    Uh-oh.  The Dems had come up with another woman to delay the confirmation!

     

    The Six Days Of Deborah Ramirez

    https://www.theamericanconservative.com/dreher/six-days-of-deborah-ramirez-kavanaugh/

     

    I feel so sorry for Kavanaugh.

    1. Show previous comments  15 more
    2. scribblet

      scribblet

      Again, you are name calling, I'm not lying, he admitted to apologizing for the incident.  

    3. betsy

      betsy

      This is about the on-going saga of the Kavanaugh controversy.

      I've deleted off-topic posts, name-callings, and posts that are based on ignorance.

    4. betsy

      betsy

       

      Quote

      The New Yorker’s Jane Mayer said she first saw Yale University alumni emails about Brett Kavanaugh’s alleged sexual misconduct in July.

      The second woman accusing Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct — Deborah Ramirez — just went public with her story, but Yale University classmates of Ramirez and Kavanaugh were corresponding about the alleged incident well before reporters contacted Ramirez, New Yorker reporter Jane Mayer told NBC News on Monday.

      https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/9/24/17895740/new-yorker-jane-mayer-yale-university-emails-brett-kavanaugh-deborah-ramirez

       

      How did Mayer learned about these alleged emails?  Lol. 

       

      If the New Yorker already got a whiff of possible misconduct by Kavanaugh in July - why wait until now to come out with the story?  That would've been a breaking news then, wouldn't it?   With Kavanaugh freshly announced as the nominee!  Why sit on that bombshell for 2 months???  That's quite unusual for a newspaper to keep quiet about something this sensational - considering it's around the time of the height of MeToo exposures.

       

      Why didn't they come out right after Ford came out with her allegation???  What were they waiting for?

      Nah.  Something doesn't add up.

       

      Just because  they've been talking about it in July - does not mean those emails weren't deliberately planted - just in case Kavanaugh would be the one nominated.   I tend to suspect the Dems had prepared quite a while back how to delay or boot out Kavanaugh (if he was the one nominated for the position).

       

      This is well-orchestrated -  in advance.  That's how it smells like to me.

  5. betsy

    Senate Majority Leader assured evangelical voters, Kavanaugh will be confirmed!

    https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/kavanaugh-senate-supreme-court-testimony-1.4834910

     

     

     

     

     

    1. Show previous comments  27 more
  6. betsy
    Why? Is there a ban for oil? List of countries by oil production https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_oil_production That they singled out the tar sands, actually support my point! Pick-n-choose! Nah. There's no real urgency!
  7. betsy
    I did answer your question. Read it again.
  8. betsy
    I don't care how you do your assessment. I didn't vote for you to be the Premier of Ontario - nor do I think you even ran for that position! As you'd said, ONTARIO IS BROKE! Lol, I already suspected that even before he came to power! Typical - we're all for getting rid of the deficits and climbing out of the hole - but only, if we're not affected in any way! He's gotta start somewhere! He can't afford to please everyone, he's got to be firm if he wants to achieve his goal - which is getting rid of the deficit! So, Toronto council cut it is! You don't like it, you don't agree - too bad - vote him out next time. Streamlining the government and saving through efficiency, are among the reasons I voted for Ford! Even if he touches and streamline the city where I am - I'm okay with that. I want him to do what he promised! I want to see the deficit down, or gone! That's what happens when you're broke - and you want to get out of being broke! You tighten up your belt! Unless, you can come up and produce a money tree - then, we're all laughing! Maybe you do, but I don't want more of the same - like, the Liberals playing shell-game with our money! And, this isn't about me! I gather you didn't vote for him. Well, I did! Enough said!
  9. betsy
    I'm an Ontarian. But, that's irrelevant.
  10. betsy
    I disagree. Any informed opinion, is relevant. Where I live is, irrelevant.
  11. betsy
    I'm expressing my opinion. Don't read it if you don't want it.......but, don't tell me I can't give my two cent!
  12. betsy
    It's irrelevant whether we're Torontonians or not. May I remind you of our constitutional right - after all, isn't breach of free expression what anti-Fords are accusing him of? We have the right to our opinion.
  13. betsy
    Whether it's "picayune" or not....that's subjective. It may be picayune to you, but it's not to me. I like to see the buck-saving start NOW! Let's just wait and see what the Supreme Court has to say about this. No point getting yourself all agitated..
  14. betsy
    I heard a person being interviewed on TV (an expert of something).....that the Supreme Court will support this latest ruling that's been presided by three judges. The latest ruling had the judges criticizing the first one! Judge Belobaba erred in his decision and they explained how. He got slapped down. https://globalnews.ca/news/4464728/appeal-court-stay-toronto-city-council/ It's a done deal.
  15. betsy
    That's why they're simply picking and choosing......and being frivolous. With the carbon or pollution taxation - that's just plain money grab! There's no urgency.
  16. betsy

    Ford was DRUNK!    By her own admission!

     

     

     

    According to Blasey, now Christine Blasey Ford, all three had been drinking; but the boys were especially intoxicated

    In other words, she was drunk too - but she says, the boys were more drunk than she was.  How can she tell ?   :lol:

     

    She can't remember details that other sex assault/rape victims could never forget! 

     

     

    Dr. Ford's testimony lacks key details

     

    https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2018/09/19/brett-kavanaugh-hearing-dr-christine-blasey-ford-sexual-assault-column/1346536002/

     

    No wonder she didmn't want to testify!  Can you imagine the cross-examination? :lol:

     

    1. Show previous comments  31 more
    2. scribblet

      scribblet

      https://apnews.com/1e4a28d230914d678fa17036ecab90ac/AP-source:-Kavanaugh,-Ford-agree-to-testify-on-Thursday

      Tentatively as she is demanding that he testifies first...   which is unusual as the accused  can't speak to the issue unless he knows what the accuser has said.  

      All designed to drag it out and run down the clock.   Grassley is nuts if he lets the Dems. roll over him on this one.

       

    3. Hal 9000

      Hal 9000

      It's obvious that she doesn't want to testify.  The Dems are simply waiting until they can blame Grassley and claim victimhood.  Ford is full of shit.   

    4. scribblet

      scribblet

      Exactly.   I'm not sure of the timel ine or what will happen if she doesn't testify Thursday, but IMO if she does not, they should just have the vote.   This is just  organized political blackmail and I'd like to know who is paying for her high priced democrat lawyers.  

  17. betsy
    So.....what's the point of banning tar sands? And all these other bannings that they pick-and-choose according to their whims? Today - it's plastic straws! Tomorrow - meh, maybe it'll be cows - for all the fartings they do! We are being treated like idiots! And, a lot of us are just fine with that!
  18. betsy
    What it tells me is that they've been prepared for this change - and everything is running fine. All those whiners were just being drama queens - especially Horwath! Torontonians should vote for those nominees who showed a good attitude of welcoming the challenge up ahead - instead of being whiners!
  19. betsy
    And? Obviously, you didn't read the article. And if you did- you're like the other guy - you better try to comprehend what it says, and get back to me when i asked, what's the point of banning tar sands. I'll ignore you for now.
  20. betsy
    Look at my latest post. Found it at Toronto site. Everything is cool.
  21. betsy
    It's the same thing. Certifying is a process that makes it official. Scroll a little bit below - check the withdrawal info. Also this: Key Dates July 30 City Clerk certified 544 candidates who filed a nomination to run for the offices of Mayor, Councillor and School Board Trustee under the 47-ward model. August 20 Also, the first day for a candidate who has already filed a nomination under the 47-ward model to notify the Clerk of their intent to continue running in the election and of their new ward number. September 14 Nominations close at 2 p.m. Also, deadline for candidates who have already filed a nomination under the 47-ward model to notify the Clerk of their intent to continue to run; otherwise they are deemed withdrawn and their name will not appear on the ballot. https://www.toronto.ca/city-government/elections/general-information/better-local-government-act-2018-bill-5/25-wards-candidate-faqs/ Lol. They just made it sound like the sky was falling. See? Everything is fine.
  22. betsy
    No, stick to the issue. I'm correcting your comment that, "the election was underway!" It was not!
  23. betsy
    Lol. They differ, don't they? See? They can't even get the date right! Which one is the right one? See the INEFFICIENCY????? Streamline farther!
  24. betsy
    What's wrong with my site? It's Toronto's site! Straight from the horse's mouth, so to speak. https://www.toronto.ca/city-government/elections/candidate-information/become-a-candidate/ 
  25. betsy
    WRONG! The filing wasn't even closed yet - anyone can still withdraw - so, what are you on about the election was already underway? Don't take my word for it. Here! https://www.toronto.ca/city-government/elections/candidate-information/become-a-candidate/ You're just repeating the lies they're spouting off!
×
×
  • Create New...