betsy

The Creator has intimate knowledge of His creation, another evidence is given to indicate the divine inspiration of the Bible, by revealing detailed knowledge of the physical world that was not understood by ‘science’ until many centuries, if not millennia, later. Pleiades, Orion and Arcturus Job 38 31 Canst thou bind the sweet influences of Pleiades, or loose the bands of Orion? 32 Canst thou bring forth Mazzaroth in his season? or canst thou guide Arcturus with his sons? In the verse, God seems to challenge Job's ability to “bind the sweet influences of Pleiades” - as if saying, “Job, do you think you can keep Pleiades together?” Pleiades (aka Seven Sisters), is an open star cluster in the constelation of Taurus. http://coldcasechristianity.com/2013/is-the-astronomy-in-the-book-of-job-scientifically-consistent/ In the verse, God seems to challenge if Job can “loose the bands of Orion.” This refers to the “belt” of Orion. In the verse, God seems to challenge Job if he can direct Arcturus (and his sons), anywhere he wants. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arcturus http://coldcasechristianity.com/2013/is-the-astronomy-in-the-book-of-job-scientifically-consistent/ Though astronomy dates back to antiquities, and is the oldest of natural sciences......the Bible gives some information that are not observable without modern-day technology.

I'm not forcing you to believe what I'm illustrating here, Gosthacked. Apparently, either you're not getting the logic behind the argument......or you're simply being a staunch atheist: you can't afford to open your mind. That's understandable. Either way, suit yourself. But I do question your sanity since you keep turning up in topics about God. It's not like as if you offer anything to refute the given argument. Saying, "it ain't so," with nothing to support your claim, isn't a rebuttal. Given your forcible self-confinement to a closed mind when it comes to the possibility of God's existence, what's the point of you debating in subjects such as these? So spare me the theatrics. I'm moving on.

From how the government acted to expedite giving the money asap - looks like the Liberals are really complicit to make sure the victim's don't get their hands on Khadr's reward.

The Liberals didn't want to disclose how much the reward is - they're hiding the real amount. We probably paid for Khadr's legal fees, as well. And maybe, he got his 20 million! Where's the Liberal's so-called transparency now? Furthermore, the apology says, http://www.castanet.net/news/Canada/201256/Official-apology-to-Khadr May have? I thought Canadian officials did play a role! Isn't that's why we're paying?

No doubt the cash will be hidden now, to prevent any from going into the hands of the victim, and victim's family. The Liberals are complicit in that too, that's why it was so hushed up - until someone leaked what was happening to the media. Of course, it's not only one terrorist who'll benefit from that cash. The Khadr siblings and matriarch will get a windfall.....and most likely, some of that cash will find its way to some terrorist cells.

Vets and soldiers should be in that press conference - and they should ask questions! I'd like to know why the Khadrs are so important to the Liberals.

Speaking of battlefields - our vets are not being properly helped dealing with PTSD over fighting with these scumbags - and yet, here we are, rewarding their enemy! How is that for morale, huh? What a big, big joke!

Only if there are witnesses. In the battlefield, anything goes.

Trump may be making a big mistake by spending time tweeting over the likes of these morons (even if they keep relentlessly attacking him) - but he's entitled to the same rights as everyone else, whether he's president or not. He has the right to express himself. He's not the first President to have had a war of words with the media, either! And before we start raising hell about these so-called expectations from leaders as to how women are regarded - let's not forget the actions of previous presidents like John Kennedy (and his strings of mistresses), and Bill Clinton's (strings of sex controversies), and his Hillary's reaction to women who complained!

I'm questioning the double-standard! And the agenda of little Miss Nitwit in raising the woman card over this "bleeding face-lift" issue - which I don't know what the hoopla is all about. It's not like as if only women have face-lifts these days. A lot of celebs have had them - regardless of gender! http://lookdamngood.com/top-10-male-celebs-you-didnt-know-had-plastic-surgery/?singlepage=1 Tom Cruise's nose wasn't like that when he started in Hollywood. Check out his early movies. She brought up the past incidents like the video with Billy Bush, and all the same-old allegations they used against Trump BEFORE the election! Well? Trump was elected despite of all that! Women voted for him! Yet, she got all prickly when the editor of Daily Mail pointed out that Trump isn't the only one saying disparaging remarks about women. Trumps remarks are being focused on, and usually taken out of context by pro-Dems/anti-Trump because of who he is. " 20-something" is an adult! He wouldn't be holding that position if he's not.

He's their prisoner! Why did he end up a prisoner in Gitmo? Whether their method is "illegal" or not.....that's their business. We shouldn't be intervening for terrorists like Chretien did with his dad - especially when they're also killing our own soldiers!

I assume he meant, "take no prisoners." It saves a lot of headache and diplomatic tensions.

And? What happened to the terrorist they got jailed in Guantanamo? What's he doing walking freely here on our street, and getting rewarded by the millions?

That's probably what will happen next time they catch a Canadian terrorist.

That "kid" is an associate producer! What? you're going use age as an excuse now? You don't know squat about this "kid" because he's not a celebrity like Trump! If he can disparage Kellyanne in such a way - then he can say other disparaging things about women......which is not a crime, I must add. You've got a double standard. Trump has the same freedom as everyone else. That's the point that's lost to our Little Miss Nitwit.

hahahahahaha

Justin Trudeau refused to provide ransom for two Canadians who eventually were beheaded. What's the reason why he didn't secure their release, and he let them get butchered? BECAUSE.................. PAYING RANSOM, SETS A BAD EXAMPLE. IT WILL ENDANGER THE LIVES OF CANADIANS ALL OVER THE WORLD. .........and here we are, setting an example on HOW TO PLAY CANADIANS FOR SUCKERS! Giving $10 million dollars to a terrorist - because we've allegedly violated his alleged rights.............................who was committing treason with his family (and helping kill Canadian soldiers, among others)................................by being complicit to his questioning in Guantanamo! DUH? Let not his citizenship put wool over our eyes and gets us all mushy. An enemy is an enemy. Perhaps the most dangerous is the enemy from within. The Khadrs were on the side of the enemies, like the ones who butchered two innocent Canadians. If we're guilty by being complicit to the brutal interrogation of a Canadian enemy (who deliberately and purposefully murdered, and maim ally soldiers).......... ........then, we are complicit to the murder of two Canadians, whose only mistake was being at the wrong place, at the wrong time! Withholding ransom which led to the death of two Canadians, and yet rewarding a terrorist with millions......whom ironically, belongs to same kind of terrorists that butchered the two Canadians. How do you score that with the families of these two innocent Canadians? How do you explain that to us?

The WORLD is not worried about right-wing Christians - or any other hybrid of terrorists! The WORLD is deeply concerned with ISLAMIST TERRORISTS! Not only is Islamist terrorism killing indiscriminately and wrecking lives and economies - it also inspires and brings out other unstable minds to act out - in an effort to draw attention to their cause, or to themselves............................. ..............................or, simply to retaliate! We are very much a huge part of that world. We're even vying to be leader of that world. If you hadn't noticed, we are on the hit list as target. If you want to know how seriously the danger is being regarded, all you have to do is go back to the celebration of 150th Canada Day - where-in prior to the occasion, our PM even took the time to come out on national tv to reassure the public of security! Did you see all the long faces in the very long line-up? More than half didn't even get to Parliament Hill! But of course, our PM isn't really taking the risk very seriously, otherwise, he wouldn't be throwing out the welcome mat to the whole world when he knows very well that proper vetting would be impossible! It makes me wonder if he knows something that the rest of us and our allies don't. Maybe, the coziness with the Aga Khan, or bailing out terrorists like the Khadrs (which Chretien also did), or giving protection to women wearing burquas, is paying off. Who knows..... And you think Islamist terrorism isn't THE problem? Are you abreast with current events?

The Creator has intimate knowledge of His creation, another evidence is given to indicate the divine inspiration of the Bible, by revealing detailed knowledge of the physical world that was not understood by ‘science’ until many centuries, if not millennia, later. The Bible Describes The Correct Order of Creation Day-Age interpretation means that each day in Genesis 1 is actually a long period of time during which God had created life. This interpretation of Genesis 1 is not figuratively in any way, and is astoundingly consistent with scientific findings/ theory. Read the article given below for the interpretation. Does Genesis One Conflict with Science? Day-Age Interpretation

If that's your counter-argument......then, everything must be going well over your head.

Right! This is NORTH AMERICA! This has been a predominantly Christian nation! http://www.pewforum.org/2015/04/02/north-america/ Like I said.....we already have our own to deal with. From looney environmentalists and radical leftists, too. No need to import anymore. Never mind "MOST LIKELY!" We know who are getting radicalized! You can call them "home-grown".....but majority of these so-called home-grown have their roots in Islam! Are you abreast with the news? How many killings all over the world have been perpetrated by Islamist terrorists, and how many from Christian right-wing? To even try to do a comparison, would be silly!

That's what I thought. Let Trump sort it out.