betsy

Never mind most people. That's not the issue. In this video about Khadr, it's proven that he's speaking the truth, and you're not.

ARTICLE 38, jacee. Check it out again. I don't know what you've been reading, but you're definitely not on the same page.

You tried to explain it from legal realities????? Hahahahaha You're kidding, right?

NO, you didn't discredit him at all. What you don't seem to realize is that it was your credibility that took a big hit! You're giving a false opinion - it shows not only did you not understand the "bitch" part in the video - but you don't know what you're on about!

CHRETIEN - Prime Minister at the time - INTERCEDED FOR HIS DAD WHO WAS CAPTURED! Golly. You should read the OP! The history of the Khadrs are detailed by a news article.

All the way back since the time of Chretien!

Wrong! I pointed out - and had proven - you're wrong! What's the article 38, if not evidence? You were trying to discredit Levant, but it's you who's wrong. Levant may be right wing and emotional, but he ain't looney. And most importantly, he isn't a liar!

NGGGGYYYYYERK (that's the buzzer sound for EPIC WRONG!) That's the narrative that the Liberals want to spread around. But, the evidence shows that he isn't a child soldier. He's already 15 (almost 16, according to Levant).

Boy - your start is a dud. You're wrong about that, as proven: https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/customary-ihl/eng/docs/v1_cha_chapter39_rule136 Another dud. Levant didn't say, he "MAY have." He said, he called the black guard "bitch," (because she's female). He also called the black female guard, a "slave." video timer - 1:20 Nice try, Omni. Now you know why I wanted you to be specific. I knew, chances are.....you'd be wrong. Note; the emoticon crap - particularly the laughing ones - obviously, aren't for you.

We agree on some issues, yes. Religion - it's a very divisive subject (since not everyone adhere to the same doctrine), so it's understandable that we won't see eye to eye in some of those hot issues.

Levant was referring to article 38. Check video timer 0:37 Read for yourself: As the ICRC commentary on Protocol it makes clear, this is not a complete ban on the use of children in conflict. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_use_of_children https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/customary-ihl/eng/docs/v1_cha_chapter39_rule136 Ezra Levant is right! You're wrong.

I'll quote Rue's post about Chretien. Boy, that's the time of Chretien! How old was Omar then? Wasn't that red flag enough that the Khadr kids were with dangerous parents? Is there a different set of rules for people like Khadr, that the CAS cannot meddle with?

Which one? Be specific.

Well.....if he's an abused child - as you and a lot of people want to think - he spent most of his youth in torture FROM HIS OWN PARENTS! Why wasn't the CAS involved early on when it came to light that the Khadr kids were being raised as "soldiers?" One of his siblins even said that he was groomed to be a suicide-bomber. A lot of couples have had their children taken away from them for lesser reasons. Kids have been taken from drug addict parents - and yet the Khadr kids were left with terrorist parents, who gave them IEDs for toys.

I agree that sometimes he gets carried away. But it's about the message, not him. Which of his statement is false? You must know, thus you got into the emoticon crap. Point it out....be specific.

The issue is about the pay-out to Khadr. I've not said anything about dark-skinned Iraqis on this topic. You're attacking me personally.

I'm just wondering if mods are still responding to reports.

The topic is not about me, hot enough. Stop making personal attacks.

How many innocent people wrongfully convicted due to negligent investigations, and later after spending years in prison, had been released? Being in prison - among felons - is a horrific torture! Did their compensations amount to 10 million? Why should Khadr - who happily participated in terrorist activities - get 10 million?

Child soldier, my foot! Why would he be any different from a teen who gets tried as an adult for serious crime?

More like....it has sullied Trudeau's reputation all the more. I hope this becomes an albatross on the Libs' neck.

The Creator has intimate knowledge of His creation, another evidence is given to indicate the divine inspiration of the Bible, by revealing detailed knowledge of the physical world that was not understood by ‘science’ until many centuries, if not millennia, later. THE PHYSICAL LAWS ARE CONSTANT Jeremiah 31 35 Thus saith the Lord, which giveth the sun for a light by day, and the ordinances of the moon and of the stars for a light by night, which divideth the sea when the waves thereof roar; The Lord of hosts is his name: 36 If those ordinances depart from before me, saith the Lord, then the seed of Israel also shall cease from being a nation before me for ever. http://www.reasons.org/articles/testing-the-biblical-claim-of-constant-physics http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/ParticleAndNuclear/constants.html

A recap of evidences given: The Creator has intimate knowledge of His creation - evidences given to indicate the divine inspiration of the Bible, by revealing detailed knowledge of the physical world that was not understood by ‘science’ until many centuries, if not millennia, later. Refer to post #57 for some detailed explanations. All from the Book of Genesis 1 and 2: *In the beginning (consistent with science's discovery that the universe had a beginning) *All waters gather to one place, and land appear (consistent with science's claim that in the early times there was only one super ocean and only one super continent - Pangaea and Panthalassa) *The waters bringing forth creatures that has life (compatible with evolutionist claim that life started in the water). *"After their kind" in relation to reproduction - without any mention of genders, except to humans - male and female - (consistent with science discovery that some species don't require a mate in order to reproduce. Some creatures are asexual) *God formed man from dust (consistent with science finding that the human body is made up of elements that comes from dirt/dust). *God's curse towards the snake that it would from henceforth crawl on its belly and eat dust (compatible with science's discovery that snakes used to have limbs or legs) *Man's dominion of animals (consistent with reality - as can be observed, even today) ------------------------ *Stretches the Heavens (consistent with science discovery that the universe is stretching). Take note that most of the verses uses the present tense "stretches." How appropriate! The universe is still stretching. Job 9:8 He alone stretches out the heavens _ and treads on the waves of the sea. Psalm 104:2; Isaiah 40:22; Isaiah 42:5; Isaiah 44:24; Isaiah 45:12; Isaiah 48:13; Isaiah 51:13; Jeremiah 10:12 Jeremiah 51:15; Zechariah 12:1 ----------------------------------------------------------- *Psalm 102:25-26, Isaiah 51:6, Hebrews 1:10-11 indicate the universe is wearing out (consistent with the Second Law of Thermodynamics) Hydrological Cycle (post #454) Atoms (post #478) Springs in the Oceans (post #493) PATHS OF THE SEAS (post #495) THE EARTH IS ROUND (post #526) AXIAL TILT (post #526) AIR HAS WEIGHT (post #551) THE SINGING STARS (post #561) THE FIRST LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS (post #566) CHICKEN CAME FIRST (post #569) EARTH WAS COVERED WITH WATER (post #573) FORMATION OF CONTINENT(S) (post #577) THE BIBLE DESCRIBES THE CORRECT ORDER OF CREATION (post #599) PLEIADES, ORION, and ARCTURUS (post #603)

Here is Trudeau's response to criticisms: https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/trudeau-defends-apology-and-105-million-payment-to-omar-khadr/article35623594/ Justin, you did not have to go the extra-mile of ensuring that the real victims do not see a dime! I'm reminded of Biblical passages how leaders are supposed to dispense justice fairly. Oppression against widows (and orphaned children), comes to mind. Anyway.....the money is now gone, and the real victims are victimized again - thanks to the Liberals. Game over.

Yes, it does. The time-line from when the first leaked news that the government was going to settle (and the widow filed her case in Canada practically the same day), to the time the cheque was expeditely given, and promptly cashed - it stinks! Peter McKay voiced that concern over the timing of the pay-out, at one of the news channel. He said that the injunction filed by Speer was pushed back a few days. That he hope the government didn't do it purposefully on "stealth," so as to deprive the widow of Speer. The Liberals protected Khadr! https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/omar-khadr-settlement-federal-government-guantanamo-bay/article35581403/ For those who quickly raise the gender card - take note that the Liberals deceitfully deprived a widow with two children! https://www.therebel.media/speerkids_com_help_us_raise_1_million_for_omar_khadr_s_victims