BubberMiley

Q from Star Trek?

No. Q. The source of all your information.

Maybe she meant vitamin Q, as in her qualudes.

You think smaller countries are getting better deals?  How?  They have even less leverage.  I agree with you though.  The Harper government entered into this deal probably thinking that getting a foot in the door was all that mattered, and that down the road things would improve.  It hasn't.  It's time NATO countries banded together and renegotiated all trade agreements involving China.

We're locked in for 24 more years (something you don't see in the also-bad U.S.-China agreement). I think it's obvious Harper was attracted by Chinese investment. I'm sure it would be interesting to see whose pockets that "investment" wound up in.

Next time, vote Jagmeet for Canada and Canadians.

I think we’re just going around in circles.  I guess we can agree on somethings and agree to disagree on somethings.

Mental note for Trumpers: If you're planning a criminal conspiracy, don't document it in a PowerPoint 

No wonder they fought so hard to keep these documents from going public. Here's the one where they disabled the National Guard before their planned riot.

He locked us in for 31 years and had the bravery to announce it late on a Friday. And you were completely unaware for the last 7 years until I told you. I guess you just have to pretend it's not true, eh?

Complete nonsense.

What is? The fact that Harper signed an iron-clad 31 year trade agreement that he announced late on a Friday because he knew it was bad for Canada? No, that happened. 

Stop stroking yourself Bubber. It's unseemly.

We have an example of how the Alt-Right's reacts to counter protests in Charlottesville. 

You’re parroting fascist talking points.  

It's fascist now to call you an idiot?

I don’t care what you call me, just stop minimizing fundamental rights.

So the Democrats were the only ones talking sense, given that quote.

Well if you really  want to go back and debate the authorization of force against Iraq in 2002, 42% of Democrats in the Senate finalized the vote to go in and fight Operation Iraqi Freedom. It was not Dems unanimous against. You sounded like you wanted us to believe it was.

If you were able to read a little better, you would see Tucker actually did.

Complete nonsense.

I’m gainfully employed.  As if that matters.  Thank you for showing your true character!

Cite?

You first.

To be honest, I'm more concerned about Omarova's communist sympathies. 

I suspect they're current.

And I think trying to pass Boebert's husband off as a sex offender for wiggling his thumb out his zipper and calling it his dick when he was a 24 year old and out drinking with his oil rigger buddies is a bit of a stretch.

Sounds desperate, but what else is new?

And let's not lose sight of the fact what set this all off was Boebert reminding her Senate colleagues about the Ilhan Omar and Eric Swalwell scandals.

I think placing somebody who was shagging a chinese spy a few years ago on the House Intelligence committee is a little more serious than Boebert's husband being tried 17 years ago on a misdemeanor. 

Slow news day.

Holy shit. You're a mess.

yup... but atleast I'm not some yappy leftist, who never really moved out of moms basement. 

Mom even washes my hair for me. Why would I leave?

He obviously has nothing to hide. Why else would he be desperately trying to hide everything? 

Of course, to any authoritarian.  Anyone that doesn’t comply to any search and seizure for any reason is obviously hiding something.  That’s what the stop and frisk supporters would say too.

Stop and frisk supporters...like Trump and Giuliani? 

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/10/08/trump-praises-stop-and-frisk-calls-for-tougher-policing-tactics.html

But that's obviously completely different than Congress receiving government records. You'd have to be a halfwit to think it's the same...and then forget it was your side who was for it in the first place.

Scurry along, then. Accept you're out of your league and try again another day.

Does dismantling institutions of the constitutional republic include ignoring federal court rulings?  Asking for a friend.

Gosar is the they guy who's siblings campaigned against him because they said he wasn't fit for office.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/gosars-brothers-apologize-on-behalf-of-the-actual-sane-members-of-our-family/ar-AAL9wcx 

They were right but he seems to fit the bill as a good Republican these days. Yours too it would seem.

Who the hell is Kathy Griffin?

Exactly. Certainly not a member of the HofR.

Sounds just like Stacy Abrams!

Sounds kinda like Democrats in 2018, 2016, 2004 and 2000! ?

It does demonstrate (again) the stupidity of allowing people to sell memberships just before an election vote. You should be required to be a member in good standing of a party for at least a year before voting in a leadership or candidate election. Otherwise you get ethnic and religious groups, like the Sikhs who elected Jagmeet Singh, or in this case crazy anti-vaxxerers able to take over a party.

So you agree that Republicans who ignore their subpoenas are doing it because they have something to hide? And therefore Hillary, who testified under oath at length, obviously had nothing to hide. 

So you agree that Obama’s attorney general had something to hide?  

Yes.

Awkward being the hypocrite you accuse others of being (again), isn't it?

Investigating you for inciting a riot is different from stop and frisk because there is evidence you committed a crime. Even you are smart enough to understand that. That's why you "retired."

But if somebody has nothing to hide, why not comply?  Or do you now retract your premise?  Regardless, law enforcement should be conducting criminal investigations not politicians conducting meaningless show trials.  But fascists love show trials.  It’s a message to all their political opponents.  You could be next if you step out of line. 

I agree that Hilary's Benghazi hearings were show trials but I wouldn't call it fascist. But it gave you an opportunity to see what a person with integrity looks like when they've done nothing wrong.

So you think Giulianni was a fascist with stop and frisk too? Is that why you support him?

But there's a difference between complaining about a specific grievance like gerrymandering or foreign interference and declaring an election to be fixed with no evidence or even a credible accusation. One is pro-democratic and one is anti-democratic.

No police were killed on January 6th.  And less police were injured than during the BLM Antifa riots you said nothing about.

Mental illness is sad.

Nobody said it wasn't his choice. You're just changing the subject again to avoid the question I asked.

And it's other people's choice to consider him a blowhard moron. 

He’s anything but a blowhard moron.  His podcasts are 2-3 hours of in depth discussions.