tml12

Martin wanted Iraq and he wanted missile defence too... http://www.conservative.ca/EN/2459/35145

I agree with you that I don't support a free vote. But I maintain my position that marriage is a religious institution.

Nonsense. Any leader that is even willing to entertain the notion of denying rights to a minority is not fit to lead. The denial of rights ought to be an election issue. Marriage, as I see it, is a religious institution. The issue of SSM is NOT an issue of minority rights...

Nah, just the fact of a sepertist party being Her Majesty's Loyal Opposition. It happened in 1993...

Only a few TML12, and Cretien would have much rather given the inspectors more time. By the time the US invaded Iraq, Hussein had conceded everthing the US asked (except leaving the country or producing non-existent WMDs.) It was pretty obvious by March 2003 that Iraq had no WMDs, and the US didn't even alow Iraq time to dismantle the few mid-range misilles that did turn up. All the high explosives at al-Qua were ignored for days after the invasion even though the weapons inspectors repeatedly told the US that this was a highest priority target. These same explosives, of course, were later used by Iraqi militants to kill and maim thousands of US troops. I did NOT support the Iraq war...yet, Martin and Harper did. OK then, it is still not a reason to not vote Conservative...

Why would that matter? Because it is annoying to read... I'm glad you are at least reading my posts tml12. It would be nice if you stopped to think of them for a while before complaining about trivial things like the font. I have thought of them, I am not a neo-con, the info is scary, etc. Tell me now why that should make me vote Liberal.

Why would that matter? Because it is annoying to read...

River, Chretien sent soldiers to Iraq secretly...

I hate Chretien the most... Read this book: http://www.canadafreepress.com/jean-chretien-scandal.htm I want my money back!!! :angry: :angry: :angry:

One wonders why Martin dropped the Red Book... Hey, Martin said 'Screw the Red Book' remember LMAO...I sure do...he concluded that he knew "it was all a bunch of bullshit." The Liberals...at least Chretien fixed the elections...

River, Do you mind not making your font? This has nothing to do with politics but it makes it harder to read...

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/sto.../BNStory/Front/ Normand Lester's new book will be released tomorrow. How do you all think this will affect the debates, Quebec sovereigntists, and the federal election campaign?

He wants to shoot em too didn't you know. And he eats babies!!!

Are you saying the Ontario Liberal/NDP anti-American urban left is representative of Canada??? :angry: If they have TOO MANY PEOPLE from Ontario they are TRYING to be more representative of Canada!!!

You are too paranoid. All journalists seem to be looking forward to a change and are showing Harper in a more positive light. I have noticed a subtle change in tone coming from all media sources in the last 3 weeks. They are thinking realistically about change. When I was a teenager I voted NDP. But now in my 20s I have moved to the right. Now, I am centre-right with an emphasis on the common good. I will vote Conservative. I thought long and hard about the election and I realize the CPC is the only party telling it like it is and willing to stand up to corruption and cronyism. My other options: Bloc=A party of discrimination. Liberal=A party of corruption and lies. NDP=A party that will put us back in debt, scare investors, and raise taxes.

Anne McLellan... :angry:

Randomness? It was a simple bloody question. One word answer: YES. If you were asked 20 questions about your platform and then someone says, "do you love Canada?" would you be a little bewildered? Of course Harper loves Canada...

http://www.conservative.ca/EN/1141/ Eureka, What does equality, government transparency, family values, federalism, etc. have to do with taxes? The left is just getting silly...

Oh grow up Eureka you know well that we need to be on good terms with the Americans for a myriad of reasons. Your childish left-wing antics astound me... :angry:

One wonders why Martin dropped the Red Book...

Stephen Harper said this? This man is a visionary. Especially if he was referring to the very "legitimate" human rights commissions issued by the United Nations, headed by Iran, Syria, and Libya. You got it...

No objections by me...

Nor should it...well put guys.

At least Martin saw the light and got over it. Why though are conservatives still propagating the myth that we need to buy into the defence shield to protect Canada's sovereignty? How is having a bunch of useless American missiles on Canadian soil protecting our sovereignty???? At best they would ensure that Canada becomes a prime target in any nuclear war. Former US Ambassador Paul Cellucci even argued this nonesense on The Current (CBC radio) in October 2005. I guess you have to expect people to defend their jobs and business interests as a matter of have or have more. Why are you still defending the neo-cons on this one tml12? I thought you had grown up a bit. I am not defending the neo-cons River. I have argued on this forum many times River that the missile defence system proposed by the U.S. government is inherently flawed, and anyone with a B.S. Physics degree could find flaws in it. Why, tml12, do you support it then? Simply put,it concerns the defence of Canada and we need a seat at the table.

http://www.canada.com/national/features/de...5f-469ed04eda68 Martin says Conservatives soft on environment...