Signals.Cpl

Schools don't need to be powerless, they can suspend/expel bullies and if that should fail to get the message across then police should get involved with progressively tougher punishments. Right now there are parents who are informed that their child is a bully and they don't take it seriously, but they will have to take it seriously and take actions to stop their children if the police starts fining the children and by extend the parents and if necessary place a restraining order and progressively larger distances if necessary...

It's so cute when you try to act smart... Please provide a source for that, what is the evidence for that claim how is it compared to other nations. Do we use the same standard to measure our "literacy and math rates" as the rest of the world? etc...

I would like to see evidence of your claims as well...

One line is not enough, the whole point of a report card is to make sure that the parents are kept up to day on the progress of their children, getting a report card that is full of useless generic comments like: "Grade: 58% Needs to spend more time on homework. Pay Attention in class." does not help either the parents or children.

To me this seems well beyond bullying or even harassment, this seems really close to murder. The piece of garbage that did this intended to cause great pain, it seems that the individual went well out of his way to ruin this young women's life in any way possible. This is a situation where I am all for vigilante justice, maybe if people had a little more fear of the consequences they would not be willing to push people to suicide. I can't see many people twice her age being able to handle her situation that much better through years of torment, yes she made a mistake but the piece of garbage decided to destroy her life by attacking her in every school she moved to while eliminating her friends wherever she went.

Go through each and every department's budget in great detail and make sure that every penny spent could be justified, whatever money cannot be justified is cut from their budget.

Yes they are, but at the same time they are also professionals who knew what was expected of them before they applied for the job. So if a teacher is not getting paid to mark assignments and tests on their own time should they cut back on that work in order to fit the marking in their work day? Or should they stop doing parent teacher interviews because they might not receive payment for the preparation that they have to put in before they meet the parents? People are turning against the teachers and their cause because it seems that they are trying to hold children hostage in order to have their demands met... give us x or we will not do after school clubs or sports, give us y or we will give you some indication of how your child is doing but if they are struggling in school we will not tell you why or in what area they are facing difficulties. Whats next? They will show up to work but will stop teaching or will they stop report cards altogether?

I think the results might be somewhat different than those from the Eastern Front in World War 2.

I was kidding, I didn't mean that you and socialist should be duking it out in person...

Be careful Mr. Canada, someone is stalking you... he knows where you reside...

Damn those Turkish bastards, how dare they defend their own nation from foreign aggressors!!!

Are you James Bond? Because you seem to be an expert on all things terrorism, military intelligence and military activities while knowing jack all.

Thats not what the RSM said...

Actually RCAF, currently doing college in Toronto. Another few months and I am out of here.

Already did a CT to the Reg Force 2 years ago so no class A for me anymore:)

I understand what you are saying, but the way I understood the suggestion it meant spreading false information in our own network which would negate the purpose because when you log in and have to wonder if its right or someone is spreading disinformation that source of information becomes useless.

This is not a movie, there are no RCMP/CSIS agents following his every move therefore his movements to and from the Russian Embassy would not be known. As part of various alliances we have to gather intelligence on issues wether they are of personal concern to us or not. You have no way to know what he needed to know or did not need to know because the CF will not release that information and at this point you are grasping at straws. He has been a member of the CF since 1996, waiting 4 more years would not have changed his situation or his allegiances. Its not first “term” officer, he was not elected to office. He had a job, he was given the tools to do his job and he chose to betray his country for a small sum of money as I said above waiting 4 more years wouldn't have changed his loyalty by much, after all he was in the military for 11 years before he betrayed his country. Monitored? Like having RCMP officers following him everywhere? Tapping his home phone, cell phone and work phone? Bugging his residence, car and office? That only happens in movies, and the issue with that is who will make sure that the people following him wont sell the information? After all if we have 100 Intelligence officers, and we have 500 RCMP officers following those intelligence officers now we just increased the people in the know by several hundred percent... So you think it is a good idea putting false information on a network designed to share the intelligence between the member nations? So if I needed to use a piece of intelligence, I would have to worry about its validity not only on the gathering end, but wether or not my side is feeding me bullshit? I would assume someone thought long and hard on how to keep the database physically safe. And you think feeding our people should prevent this hypothetical scenario? If I am going in to battle, I want to know that I have the best available intelligence which would give me the best chance to see my family again. Sitting in some godforsaken place about to walk in to god knows what wondering wether the intelligence I am acting on is not complete bullshit some officer is feeding me because he is given false information through the network meant to make intelligence more accessible? I would rather risk one guy leaking this information and causing problems than hundreds of soldiers, sailors and aircrew dying because the member nations are withholding or knowingly putting bullshit information in the network in order to prevent leaks. So you want to solve a relatively rare problem by causing massive damage to our intelligence gathering and distribution infrastructure? Fact is neither of us is privy to the infomration or its potential use therefore negating this remark. I know some people who would disagree. You really really have no idea what you are talking about do you? The CF has plenty of safeguards put in to place, sometimes they fail as those safeguards were designed by people and could be voided by people. You are making an assumption that is 100% wrong, there are safeguards no matter what security clearance you have you would have no acess to information you don’t need. How many times has this happened in Canada in the last 20 years? What was his exact job? What did he need to know? In what field was he involved? You don't know what his job was, I don’t know what his job was, and you seem to lack any form of knowledge about the subject so... There are security protocols put in place with regards to USB and other form of data storage, obviously this traitor found a way around it. You don’t know his job description and neither do I. What a newspaper said he did, and what he actually did most likely are two completely different things. Yes because you are in the know on this subject right? One guy does not constitute a structural problem with the organization it means he found a loophole he used to get around the safeguards and you can rest assured that any holes will be plugged soon if they have not been plugged already. Any scientific data to back this up? Because I can point to quite a few American cases where they betrayed their country even with 20 years service. And what would those officers with less than 20 years of service do? Deliver Timmies? What about the countless NCM’s who deal with top level intelligence? What do we do with them? Reality and what you THINK are two very different things. I have been in the military for 5 and a half years now and I can tell you what you are imagining here and reality do not match by a loooooong shot. You don’t know shit, because those in the know will not be discussing their jobs with anybody who does not need to know. What on earth are you going on about? Non issued sticks cannot be used in military computers without prior clearance by higher, if they are used without clearance by higher and by extension technical oversight the station is immediately shut down and account is locked until the user explains their actions. Seems to me that you read too many books from people who like yourself don't know what they are talking about. Says who? What proof can you present to support this garbage argument? Intelligence should be available when needed, and intelligence networks are not wikipedia where anyone and everyone is allowed access and allowed to change information as they please...

Not to such a degree as to make any and all intelligence useless because the people who need to know have to spend enormous amounts of time deciphering what is real and what is disinformation thereby making any timely action impossible.

How certain are you that the information was non-duty? Top Secret clearance combined with need to know led to this, he had access in order to do his job. What are you talking about? And what happens to our side? We put disinformation in our network to misinform the Russians in the off chance that they are spying? What happened here is an isolated case, making all of our intel useless because we are afraid someone will see it seems to be an over reaction. 1)What are you talking about? 2)He needed to know, it was his job. 3)What? What was his job? Bringing timmies? He had the clearance, and he had the need to know therefore he was given access. You are assuming he had no need to access the information, and shouldn't have been given duties in his field for the first “term” which as a concept is stupid beyond belief which points to you have absolutely zero idea as to what you are talking about. What is the point of time in a career that a member will be immune to betraying his/her country? He signed up for a job, he was allowed the resources to do the job, and he chose to betray his country he chose to betray Canada, and saying that he would have made a different choice if he were given access after his first 4 or 6 years is ignorant if you are willing to betray your country now it likely wont change much unless his personal situation changed.

RCN Super Carriers.

The Americans had wikileaks, I don't think they have much ground to complain about, not that this is a small deal since this traitor had access to information on the naval activities, movement and potentially strategy of the United States, United Kingdom, Canadian, Australian and New Zealand navies.

They did turn him over to Pakistan, and the Americans graciously picked him up from Pakistan as well. Where does the FBI make those claims?

Excuses, excuses and guess what, more excuses. All you provided was a lame attempt by some idiot to blame his actions on the police and escape consequences. So even if police were using excessive force in location A why does he destroy property not even associated with the police, and then assault police officers in location B? This bullshit will not fly for anyone else so why are you surprised? What we need is to let him finish his jail sentence, cut off his welfare and make him pay back every single cent of damage he did.

Read it again and tell me how his sentence is appropriate? How much is the appropriate level of damage to warrant something more than a slap on the wrist?

so he was 10 in 2002? I think your info is a little off...