Signals.Cpl

Sorry where does she admit to telling him to dig it out of the garbage? Common sense states the teacher was making the comment for future reference while the child rephrased it "slightly".

Great job ignoring her:)

I am agreeing with you, Khadr and his kind don't give innocent people a chance so why should we.

More accurately I support death for people who will willingly commit mass murder. They do/did it in Afghanistan, America, Spain, France, England, Russia, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Israel, Pakistan, and many other countries. If you are willing to commit mass murder of people who have not done anything to deserve death means you don't deserve to live. Who will be responsible for the body count should it turn out that he cannot be rehabilitated and or has no desire to live a peaceful life? What if he decides to go to Afghanistan and kill Canadian soldiers or more Americans? Or is wounded in the process and comes to Canada for medical treatment after killing Canadian soldiers?

Give the little cockroach a chance, something many of his friends don't give to the little girls they murder in Afghanistan. They don't give a chance to civilians who they blow up in suicide bombings. Maybe you are right, we shouldn't even give the animal a chance.

I do too, if we go down that path any childhood trauma could excuse the same behaviour as an adult.

I reread the comments on the previous page, and I am sorry but using eyeball as a source does not add credibility to the argument actually it might be counterproductive to your argument.

I agree 100%, but the way jacee is going on as if there was a shred of proof that the teacher did tell the child to dig through the garbage proves that she did not read the article in question or chose to ignore parts of the article.

Enjoy? Fun? For sport? None of those apply to my post or point of view I can use smaller words for you if you want. He wants to fight for Afghanistan then he should go live there. Khadr and the other animals like him would kill me and any other western citizen given the chance, I don't see why I would wish him to live and get his chance to do it again.

So you want to know if every single one of those 20,000 jobs was necessary or unnecessary?

Any sources for that accusation?

Where was it PROVEN that the teacher told the child to dig through the garbage?

Then you agree there must be a reason to eliminate those jobs, thus someone decided we get the same or better level of service from less people. Could eliminate a whole level of unnecessary bureaucracy in some departments.

Get out of jail free card. He makes an IED that kills 5 Americans and in ensuing battle is injured, he comes to Canada to take advantage of the healthcare. His family as a whole have proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that they do not care about Canada except when it comes to healthcare or other events brought on by their terrorist activities. I don't think he is entitled to a Canadian Citizenship if he is going to Afghanistan and trying to kill me and other Canadian soldier,sailors and aircrew. Send him back to afghanistan and take his passport, let him get a 10min head start and send the Infantry to hunt the animal down. Hopefully someone takes care of that human Garbage.

Sorry I don't understand the question.

Well I am making an assumption. I am assuming that someone decided the jobs were non essential to the governments ability to provide services and it was not someone who picked jobs to be eliminated out of a hat.

First thing out of the mouth of the NDP propaganda was that the Conservatives did it, it couldn't possibly be the Liberals setting up the Conservatives or the NDP covering a bigger discrepancy it must be the Conservatives.When people have a suspected culprit in mind then they disregard evidence that might prove their innocence. The dead end in one part of the investigation might prove that the Conservatives were innocent and that it was another organization responsible for the event in question, but some people will never be satisfied with the conservatives being proven innocent.

How do you know its just an arbitrary number? Im assuming someone somewhere sat down and determined which jobs are required and which are not.You are assuming they are required and thats in arbitrary number.

Where does it say they were required in the first place? The federal governments job is to provide services in the most efficient way possible.

What do you smoke? Thats all I want to know.

Its not like his brother is getting free healthcare on our dime because he was injured by the Americans fighting Afghanistan. Its not like we will have to foot the bill for the RCMP/CSIS personnel who will be monitoring his activities for the next decade or more.What about the costs associated with lawyers and such and his continued healthcare? Honestly, fighting against Canada and/or our allies should be life in prison and revoking citizenship. He wanted to fight for the Taliban so let them take care of him.

First thing out of the anti-Conservative crowd was they are guilty so they went out and moulded the evidence to fit the accused thus all the evidence is to one level or another tainted.

Public sector is not welfare, if the jobs are not required then they should be removed.

I know the process, get the evidence and it will tell you who is guilty. As opposed to accusing someone of guilt and then fitting the evidence to "prove" your case.

And where do you get the figure that he was involved with them at 8? Got a source that he was fighting at 8?