Five of swords

I would be fine with organizing a cage match against your old French teacher if you like. But I'm just informing you what the actual official holocaust narrative is. Yes. The evidence is thr account of a bunch of eyewitnesses and some ex german officer confessions given under duress, and some photograph of a pile of shoes. There is no physical evidence that 'remains'. No bodies, no pieces of some gas delivery system, nothing. The germans were just so good at destroying evidence, you see. By the way, poland actually lost more than 10% of its population in ww2. At the end of the day, poland looks pretty stupid to not just give up the free city of danzig.

There is a room at auschwitz that people call a gas chamber. There is nothing else. Just a room. There is no mesh columns left, there is no fan blade from any ventilation system, there is a wooden door which could not possibly be airtight enough to be the 'original' door. Nothing. Nothing that would suggest that this room was ever a gas chamber rather then just a room. Yes the nsdap kept careful records. In fact we know that there was a typhus outbreak one month where about 6k jews died. But they lacked the capacity in the crematoria to dispose of 6k bodies in one month, so some were disposed in other ways. This is despite the fact that the ovens allegedly incinerated 1.5k bodies per day (and that estimate is reduced from the 1980's when it was claimed 4 million died at aushwitz...today the estimate is 1 million)

Without gas chambers, there is no holocaust. As I pointed out already, without gas chambers, you cannot accuse Hitler of doing anything that the usa did not also do against germans and Japanese people. It is meaningless. You don't seem to get that, and that frankly makes you a holocaust denier.

Well ok. You go to Germany and insist the holocaust was just concentration camps and see if you aren't arrested.

They don't, dude. Everyone knew jews and other political prisoners were sent to concentration camps. The usa also sent Japanese and German Americans to concentration camps. Hitler was no different from Truman whatsoever in that respect...and nobody was shocked by it, lol. The 'holocaust' is a term associated with the alleged death camps, such as aushwitz, which the usa never 'liberated'. All of those camps were 'liberated' by the soviets, and they could provide zero physical evidence that they were in fact death camps. The explanation being that the germans destroyed all the evidence.

Did you know concentration camps have nothing to do with the holocaust?

So you agree that what term is used is irrelevant. Glad that is settled.

It's difficult to obtain reliable information on an event that didn't occur. You shouldn't be too critical of journalists for that.

Dude...what I claimed was that you cannot find the truth about what happened in ww2 from a Google search. There just is no internet link that will tell you any truth about this topic. You would be forced to read books and stuff and indeed if you want any depth you have to read books never even translated to English (or some that were, but the bronze plates were destroyed following ww2). But you can't do good faith discussion so you can't avoid strawmanning. I get it. The fact that scientists use the term 'climate change' to refer to a recent increase in global temperature is just well known. I'm just going to dismiss that. I guess I could just inform you what 'ipcc' stands for in the UN ipcc report, but if you don't know this stuff then you lack the education to have a conversation on this subject.

Lol...ran cover for the holocaust?

The Israel hamas conflict will change everything for the NYT

You are actually just trying to argue linguistics lol...and it isn't even an argument it is just you being butthurt that a certain word is used to describe a certain phenomenon. You know how science works? It is empirical. You have to run experiments and stuff. How exactly would you propose to run an experiment demonstrating that there is no average temperature on planet earth if we use the word 'climate' to describe it? Would translations of the word climate into other languages also cause thermometers to shatter? Or does this only work in English? I would love to see you try your experiment.

So what if someone wanted to speak of the atmospheric conditions of earth as opposed to say, venus. If they happen to use the word 'climate' to describe that then would the universe explode from some logical contradiction woven into the fabric of the space time continuum? Oops, did I just do that?

So you are predicting no change. I'll actually predict something surprising. The NYT will shift to being a bit sympathetic to Trump. Not CNN, but the NYT will.

Actually. All journalism has been a farce for over 200 years. You should check out some of the howlers that were published during the French revolution.

It isn't open to debate. The allies had no knowledge of the holocaust until after 1945. This is just a fact. The polish resistance made claims earlier? Okay...no contradiction.

Well it is well known that public opinion had never informed public policy in any 'democracy'.

There was no knowledge of the holocaust in 1942, according to the official history. You seem to get a lot of things wrong.

Well here https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/us-government-turned-away-thousands-jewish-refugees-fearing-they-were-nazi-spies-180957324/ So about as popular as forced integration of schools was in the US south.

It seems like you just deny that it is possible for the earth's climate to change. If the sun exploded do you think it might have a chance in changing rhe climate?

It has never been true of any fascist state. Consider your sources. Try doing a Google search and find out when women first gained the right to vote in Italy. Curious what you find.

Well there was in fact greater than zero production in Germany, if that is inconsistent with socialism

I know people you trusted told you this but it simply isn't true.

Dude...if you are talking about the usa turning away the cruise ship with a bunch of jews from hitler's Germany, it is literally because the us suspected they were spies. It had nothing to do with antisemitism. Hitler had brought spies to the usa before under exactly the same cover. But the reason the usa historically did not want jews, like why the 1927 immigration bill tried very much to avoid importing jews, it is because they tend to dominate trade and finance and many people were worried they would just wind up taking over the usa with their connections to banking money. Antisemitism, I guess...but nothing to do with religion.

Lol. actually this has no relation whatsoever to fascism.