Five of swords

Stalin had nothing to do with it. The uk and the usa were dedicated to destroying Germany long before they officially declared war. Hitler would say that this is because their politicians were controlled by jewish bankers. It is interesting to note that Churchill depended on the Jewish ceo of shell oil company to pay his gambling debts...but you can make up you own mind on that theory. Regardless, it seems pretty silly to call it suicide when it was a war that he desperately tried to avoid. What happened to Germany was murder, not suicide.

Hitler was quite open about the fact that he was inspired by how the usa managed to create a white continent not by enslaving the natives but rather by constantly pushing them deeper into the wilderness. He wanted to employ the same basic strategy to germanize Ukraine. So if that offends you, bear in mind that the usa did it first...

Are you changing your mind now about whether Hitler wanted war with the western powers?

Lol...do I need to point out that you cannot both have slaves and also kill them? Clearly Hitler had no intention of allowing these people to remain in Germany as slaves. He deported many. And it was thr official policy to deport them all, when possible. Of course according to people who believe the holocaust, his ultimate goal became extermination. You cannot enslave people that you killed. Right?

Lol...well...not everyone would consider that policy to be 'nice'. Some people would rather be slaves than deported or executed, I guess. But if knowing the real policies of Adolf Hitler makes you admire the guy then that is something for you to worry about, not me.

Nobody is a nazi. That is just a pejorative slang that anglos used for national socialists. Anyway your implication here is fascinating. Are you under the impression that anyone who can state hitler's ideas honestly would necessarily become a fan? Big if true, I guess. But of course...whether or not Hitler outlawed the thule society does not depend on whether or not I personally am a fan of Hitler. Right? That is just an elementary logical fallacy.

I would certainly agree that race was important to Hitler. That is also my impression from reading him. But you have lost the plot. This quote is 1) not from Hitler and 2) not about Germans being 'superior'.

Hitler wasnever going to allow slaves to exist. In fact that is an absurd idea and totally antithetical to national socialism, which required a homogeneous population. The resources he wanted was oil and farmland. Not, as you suggested, some radical natural selection to prove german superiority.

By stating facts? Hitler opposed any and all forms of secret societies even if they seemed to be on his 'side'. He outlawed the thule society. That is just a fact. If that contradicts what you want to believe about Hitler then oh well. Hitler was talking about himself in third person?

That isn't what Hitler said...that is your ridiculous interpretation if his world view. Again, I am asking you to actually quote Hitler. If someone else is telling you what they think Hitler thought, that means nothing.

You seem to be thinking about the thule society which hitler outlawed. There was nothing 'occult' about Hitler.

So...how does this quote even support your claim? Did he suggest germans are superior?

That is not at all the impression I got from it. Hitler certainly saw that the task ahead was monumental and dangerous and there would be a lot of glory involved. He certainly hoped Germans would be up to the task. But you might misunderstand what he actually wanted, which was just resources. Anyeay that whole thing wasn't even in mein kampf it wad in his unpublished 2nd book so I dunno where you got this.

This is like some guy in 1600 insisting that anyone who doesn't know that Jesus is God is ignorant, lol. You are simply parroting American propaganda. Ironically it was always America that was deeply invested in the question of which race was 'superior', not Germany. Superiority is a fundamental part of liberalism and the striving for meritocracy within it. National socialists rejected that obsession and preferred collaboration over competition. I think you are actually thinking about HS Chamberlain, who was not himself a national socialist but instead was britishand deeply full if liberal ideology. Hitler found his workamusing and poor tially useful primarilybecause the guy argued that jesus was Aryan rather than jewish...so it could perhaps be a way to fight Christian zionism. But that was the extent of its utility. Go ahead and find anything from Hitler and goebbles which suggested that they cared at all about which race was 'superior'. They simply didn't. This is a caricature of what they actually believed that was invented during denazification.

He wanted to colonize Ukraine so he wouldn't be dependent on other countries for oil and food. He saw firsthand the mass starvation that occurred during the blockade ending ww1, remember. It was just pragmatism...not some silly darwininan nietzsche thing.

Untermensch did not actually mean inferior, by the way. It meant a people who did not build their own independent civilization. So the bantu would not be untermensch, for example...because they did make their own thing. But Hitler would certainly say they have no high culture. Jews, meanwhile, would be untermensch because they always occupied a larger nation rather than building their own. But they certainly were not considered inferior but rather a very dangerous threat thanks to their cunning and resourcefulness.

His main difference from marxist thought was that he rejected the 'materialist dialectic' which basically considered all history and motives to be driven fundamentally by wealth. In that paradigm, nation is an 'illusion' which distracts from the real issue, which is class warfare. Hitler instead believed classes could be inspire to collaborate and be on the same team if they were sufficiently loyal to their national identity. Basically, if nation>money.

Don't agree with this at all. Hitler clearly wanted to avoid war. And survival doesn't imply superior. In fact he stated explicitly that great nations will quickly go extinct when they lose their will to survive. That is pretty much a direct quote from the book. He didn't suggest it is a good thing, just that it happens

Dude...this is Wikipedia and this is the official myth of the current day usa. This is about as useful as asking Stalin about what capitalists believe, lol. Try citing anything from any of the nsdap leadership...it doesn't exist

1) the past the third Reich was recalling was not mythical at all. In fact it was in the living memory of most germans. 2) until the nsdap acquired power they had no control over what media people listened to. 3) national socialists never suggested anyone was 'better'. Most if them would say that is a childish concern. What they focused on was the idea that Germans should be sovereign over Germany and that at that time they were not.

Control is basically the whole point of government. Civilization, even.

Might just be a psy op. Obviously most Muslims would want to kill someone for saying Muhammad loved gays.

Hitler did not like capitism either. He wanted all major business to ultimately be under state control. He had more tolerance for industry than finance. He was very interested in reducing global trade to a minimum.

Socialists kill other socialists all the time. Hitler was socialist. Uh no. There were dozens of parties

Eh? I think it is common knowledge that Islam doesn't like guys. But people can still support people who hate them. It is altruistic, not a contradiction.