User

At least as much as yours do... at least he is not a lazy spambot troll every day.

He screamed into the void.

And yet you and others keep calling him a dictator.... Well, for the federal election laws that were cited and the evidence shown, they had enough for a warrant. Apparently, that was not so debunked after all.

It was a strawman, I explained why. Notice... we did not invade Venezueala. We arrested the dictator who was not even recognized as the rightful ruler. No, I just point out the duplicity of your arguments that you support Russia, defend them, justify their actions, while you denounce NATO and say they do not need to exist. You never seem to have a negative thing to say about Russia, but NATO? Oh man. I already pointed out how this argument is just a ruse. Your arguments do not stop at just not wanting your money to pay for it. Because NATO exists in part to oppose Russian aggression that also threatens NATO. We also have a historical obligation to help Ukraine. Are you Russian? Do you live in Russia? What does any of this have to do with how you side with Russia, oppose NATO, and support, justify, and defend Russian aggression, but oppose NATO support for Ukraine? Did you know that NATO borders Russia?!?!?! No one is interested in a war with Russia. No shit. Neither was Ukraine. Russia had other plans, you know, the country you sit here defending. What does this have to do with anything other than you continuing to prove my point, that you can never quite seem to come up with any criticism of Russia or point out how poorly things are going for them on the war front? You are the one presuming WWIII here, essentially arguing that no one can do anything to oppose Russian aggression because OMG it will be WWIII! Here we are years later with NATO allies continuing to ever-increase their aid to Ukraine and the types of weapons, and... guess what, no WWIII. You dream on, NATO allies have no desire to see Russia conquer Ukraine. You continue to lie about how this all went down, as if it was just some natural uprising. There were plenty of complaints; Trump was one of the key figures before the war started. I don't have to convince myself of anything; you are here right now, proving you have some affinity for Russia. You completely ignored my calling out the conflicting nature of your argument as well. Imagine that.

Like I said, you guys don't care how many are killed, as long as it is not by guns. If they only stabbed a few people to death, oh well.

This sums up your mentality. You really do believe this crap is an ignorant meme. There are bridges between Mexico and America too! As well as a new one in the works.

OMG, what police force? Who is going to confiscate the guns? How will we ever do anything?!?!?!! Go play your stupid game somewhere else.

Oh man... not much of a dictator.

Sounds like they are already accountable as they were the first to die, at least 2 family members that is. However... would it have been better if they were stabbed to death in their sleep? If you think this person was so dangerous, why was he not in a care facility?

No, this was your strawman, not mine. I clearly said my statement was not an absolute, obviously. The difference is that you are taking sides with Russia and justifying their actions... and it appears you were siding with Maduro... do you like all the evil dictators around the world and take their sides? Sort of did... LOL NATO is not fighting, but we can certainly help. It's funny, though, that you think it is cool, justify, defend, and support saying it was Russia's business to help the ethnic Russians, but definitely not NATO's business, to oppose Russian aggression. Your criticisms are all one way, never the direction of Russia. OMG, you mean, war is a mess? Yes it is. You have been making it seem like literally anything and everything that happens is the end of the world for Ukraine for years now. And as before, your noticing of how bad things are never seems to look at Russia. Ukraine has not lost. You have been saying they have lost for years. Still there, still fighting. You play this stupid game over and over again, that we can't dare oppose Russian aggression or it will be WWIII! OMG! So, if you want to give Russia WWIII veto power over all their actions, you are just fine with them invading the whole damn world. Yes, I do expect Russia to pack up and leave. They are the wrongful aggressors here invading. I find it appalling that you just expect Ukraine to surrender and be conquered. The NATO alliance, while primarily to thwart the Soviet Union, purpose as a defensive alliance doesn't end nor has that purpose come to an end. To the point, Russia is still a threat and still poses a threat. You sit here trying to argue Russia is such a grave threat we must be concerned about angering them into WWIII and then also argue there is no need for NATO. Why... it is almost like you have a nefarious motive to just support Russia and because NATO opposes the kind of aggression from them you support here, you don't like NATO.

Oh yeah! So, it was about the same exact kind of comment, and I swear these same leftists were losing their minds about that comment, and now they are defending this one.

If it is OK for black people to have pride in their race, it is OK for white people. Also, the whole notion that there is some kind of systemic underlying racism in police killing black people is based on a lie. The data doesn't support that.

I wish this forum's search engine worked. I swear, wasn't it just a week ago that Trump said something stupid and all the leftists on here were accusing him of saying he was going to kill someone or something like that? And it was not even as direct as this comment was.

Hamas was throwing hand grenades into shelters, killing women and children cowering inside. You don't give a shit about children, only inasmuch as it serves you, supporting the terrorists you do.

You have no respect for human rights as you support Hamas raping, torturing, and murdering as many Israeli's as they can.

Yes, sovereign like those. My position is not one of absolutes, which leaves us to justification... and that you support Russia going to war here. We already know that. Yes, you have literally cheered them on and continue to support them. You brought up winning an election, in questioning Zelensky being able to win, I called out how you don't criticize Putin for his "win" (He is a dictator and did not win), and instead of dealing with that you play this dumb obfuscation game. More of your Russian propaganda to support them. Russia ran black ops with their military in the region, funding separatists and helping them take control of the regional government, and outright backing them with Russian military and equipment. As any country would do, yes, obviously duh, they resisted this and fought. Why does NATO exist? Why does NATO exist? Why does NATO exist?

Folks on the left like Beaver, never quite get around to reconciling how they think people are soooooooo dangerous they shouldn’t have access to guns, but that they should still be free to roam the streets. I mean, I guess it makes sense when all they do is care about the guns, as if stabbing people to death, running them down with a box truck, or pushing them into an oncoming train… are all just perfectly fine ways of killing people. Guns bad! Is about as fa as their ability to reason goes.

Yes, adults can do as they please, if the want to pretend to be something they are not… but this is also about what we are doing to children and while Adults can do as they please, I can certainly care to call it out for what it is and not participate.

“At least” We can understand English just fine.

What do you think is meant by saying AT LEAST in Somalia they execute pedophiles? I swear, you will continue to literally spin in your grave you do so much of it here.

Just remember this every time you do this same crap.

Why do you want to limit access to firearms for someone having psychiatric episodes? The threat they pose to society doesn't stop if they do not have a gun. I did not say we should involuntarily commit people so the firearms can stay in the home; I said we should do so because they are considered a threat to society. You clearly do not know much about firearms, as you can also keep them locked and secured. And to the earlier point... if these people are a threat to society, what does having them move out do?

LOL, you say this because you support this madness.

YOU are the biggest troll on this forum.

This is a lie. Yes, we have video, and you still lie.