User

Yes, just as you are doing so right now. It was not murder. The ICE officer did not break all the protocols.

Your usual dishonest misdirection. You can't argue about Biden, so you deflect and ignore the point. Um, no. You kept saying there was no evidence they were drug boats as if the US Military were just out blowing up people enjoying a picnic on their sailboat. I rightly mocked you because it would have to be a grand conspiracy from every level of the chain of command to just have the military out randomly blowing up innocent people just for fun. I am not suggesting anything about the Biden DOJ, they did outright abuse the DOJ to target people for political motivations. That is an observable fact. Where you seem to be having trouble is not that there wasn't just enough excuse to do it, but that they used that excuse to contort and twist the law anyway they could to do so. Which is why I am just fine with Trump doing the same. Great circular argument you have going there.

Who said anything about abuse of power? Corruption? These are reasons to go after these leftists. No one just randomly said go after anyone; these Democrats went on national TV to incite mutiny. Screw them. Go after them for anything and everything that they can.

This is not the only abuse nor anything specific I mentioned. Also: Emails show FBI didn't see probable cause to raid Mar-a-Lago, but did due to pressure https://katv.com/news/nation-world/emails-show-fbi-didnt-see-probable-cause-to-raid-mar-a-lago-but-did-due-to-pressure-donald-trump-jack-smith-biden-chuck-grassley "WASHINGTON (TNND) — Emails between the FBI and Department of Justice in 2022 show that the bureau didn’t see a probable cause to raid President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home, but did it under pressure from the Biden DOJ."

No, now you are just lying. It is like a 40-page document, which cleary cites more than you lie about here. This investigation has presently focused on the following deficiencies or defectswith the November 3, 2020, election and tabulation of the votes thereof:a. The tabulator machines used by Fulton County are designed to create and save ascanned image of each ballot. Fulton County has admitted that it does not havescanned images of all the 528,777 ballots counted during the Original Count or the527,925 ballots counted during the Recount.1b. Fulton County has confirmed that during the Recount of votes, some ballots werescanned multiple times. Ballot images made available in response to public recordrequests show ballots with unique markings duplicated within the ballot images.c. During the Risk Limiting Audit, auditors counting the votes by hand reported votetallies for batches inconsistent with the actual votes within the batch. The State’sPerformance Review Board2 reported that Secretary of State investigatorsconfirmed inaccurate batch tallies from the Risk Limiting Audit.d. Auditors assisting in the Risk Limiting Audit reported counting purported absenteeballots that had never been creased or folded, as would be required for the ballot tobe mailed to the voter and for the ballot to be returned in the sealed enveloperequiring the voter’s signature for authentication.e. On the day of the deadline to report the Recount results, Fulton County reported arecount totaling 511,343 ballots, 17,434 ballots fewer than original counted. Thefollowing day, Fulton County then reported a total of 527,925 ballots counted.1 The Fulton County Ballots were counted three times. For purposes of clarity, this affidavit usesthe following terms to refer to each of the three counts. “Original count” is used to reference theoriginal count of ballots on election night and into the following day. “Risk Limiting Audit”refers to the hand recount completed in mid-November 2020. “Recount” refers recountcompleted by machine in early December 2020.2 Following the election, the Georgia State Election Board convened a bipartisan PerformanceReview Board to review the election.

You sit here fear-mongering about how Russia is going to start WWIII, but then say others have an intense hatred/fear of Russia. LOL Once again, I will point out, Russia is invading Ukraine right now. Once again, you are lying about what happened in Ukraine. This is pure Russian propaganda that you are pushing to somehow justify their war, to all out full blown invade Ukraine.

What is crazy here is that you think they are such a threat to society you need to remove guns, but not remove them.

It is clear you did not even bother to read what the search was for and the crimes being alleged. No more a fascist than you were when you didn't give a shit when Biden was doing it and if the stupid search worked, likely supported it. How is that fascism? There is no conspiracy. They did it. And yet, my belief in Democacy is just fine, Democracy went on even after Biden abused the DOJ to target people politically. It will continue to go on, but only a bit more costly for the leftists who deserve everything they get. I have no remorse after what happened. Even now, you defend what Biden did, so no, now you leftists get what you get.

It is not indiscriminate. It is not because they are eccentric. Or an oddball. It is not because you think they are gay. It is because you think they are a threat to society. So... cool, you are fine with them having guns. They are not a threat. You keep saying you are just fine with people you think are a threat to society being out on the streets. Hell, you leftists are why there are crazy people stabbing people to death on the subway. Then, you turn around and want to prosecute the people who try to stop those crazy people. Arrested over and over again for violently attacking people until they finally kill or are killed, and all you give a shit about is the gun.

A crazy person locked up is no threat to anyone. Either they are crazy and a threat to society or they are not. Your position is that, you don't give a crap how many people they kill, as long as it is not with a gun.

My argument was not that it was completely debunked like yours. Your accusation of flip-flopping goes both ways, too. Um, I have made my position clear here numerous times, that on this issue, regarding the DOJ and going after people, I don't give a shit how valid or legitimate anything is, I want Trump to go after any and ever Democrat as much as he can. It is the only way to teach you, leftists, a lesson after what Biden did. After what the Biden DOJ did to Pro-Life folks, game on.

You are so incredibly ignorant. Reminds me of a friend from Malawi, who grew up a normal life, no problems, her family was fine, and she was black. A real African American. So.. what history of poor treatment does she share in common with anyone because she is black? You are so ignorant you don't even grasp it, that no, not all black people or asians or indigenous people have something of a history of treatment they share. Black Lives Matter is a slogan built on more ignorance, pushed by dishonet race baiting hustlers. The question is, which are you?

Because you are a coward.

At least as much as yours do... at least he is not a lazy spambot troll every day.

He screamed into the void.

And yet you and others keep calling him a dictator.... Well, for the federal election laws that were cited and the evidence shown, they had enough for a warrant. Apparently, that was not so debunked after all.

It was a strawman, I explained why. Notice... we did not invade Venezueala. We arrested the dictator who was not even recognized as the rightful ruler. No, I just point out the duplicity of your arguments that you support Russia, defend them, justify their actions, while you denounce NATO and say they do not need to exist. You never seem to have a negative thing to say about Russia, but NATO? Oh man. I already pointed out how this argument is just a ruse. Your arguments do not stop at just not wanting your money to pay for it. Because NATO exists in part to oppose Russian aggression that also threatens NATO. We also have a historical obligation to help Ukraine. Are you Russian? Do you live in Russia? What does any of this have to do with how you side with Russia, oppose NATO, and support, justify, and defend Russian aggression, but oppose NATO support for Ukraine? Did you know that NATO borders Russia?!?!?! No one is interested in a war with Russia. No shit. Neither was Ukraine. Russia had other plans, you know, the country you sit here defending. What does this have to do with anything other than you continuing to prove my point, that you can never quite seem to come up with any criticism of Russia or point out how poorly things are going for them on the war front? You are the one presuming WWIII here, essentially arguing that no one can do anything to oppose Russian aggression because OMG it will be WWIII! Here we are years later with NATO allies continuing to ever-increase their aid to Ukraine and the types of weapons, and... guess what, no WWIII. You dream on, NATO allies have no desire to see Russia conquer Ukraine. You continue to lie about how this all went down, as if it was just some natural uprising. There were plenty of complaints; Trump was one of the key figures before the war started. I don't have to convince myself of anything; you are here right now, proving you have some affinity for Russia. You completely ignored my calling out the conflicting nature of your argument as well. Imagine that.

Like I said, you guys don't care how many are killed, as long as it is not by guns. If they only stabbed a few people to death, oh well.

This sums up your mentality. You really do believe this crap is an ignorant meme. There are bridges between Mexico and America too! As well as a new one in the works.

OMG, what police force? Who is going to confiscate the guns? How will we ever do anything?!?!?!! Go play your stupid game somewhere else.

Oh man... not much of a dictator.

Sounds like they are already accountable as they were the first to die, at least 2 family members that is. However... would it have been better if they were stabbed to death in their sleep? If you think this person was so dangerous, why was he not in a care facility?

No, this was your strawman, not mine. I clearly said my statement was not an absolute, obviously. The difference is that you are taking sides with Russia and justifying their actions... and it appears you were siding with Maduro... do you like all the evil dictators around the world and take their sides? Sort of did... LOL NATO is not fighting, but we can certainly help. It's funny, though, that you think it is cool, justify, defend, and support saying it was Russia's business to help the ethnic Russians, but definitely not NATO's business, to oppose Russian aggression. Your criticisms are all one way, never the direction of Russia. OMG, you mean, war is a mess? Yes it is. You have been making it seem like literally anything and everything that happens is the end of the world for Ukraine for years now. And as before, your noticing of how bad things are never seems to look at Russia. Ukraine has not lost. You have been saying they have lost for years. Still there, still fighting. You play this stupid game over and over again, that we can't dare oppose Russian aggression or it will be WWIII! OMG! So, if you want to give Russia WWIII veto power over all their actions, you are just fine with them invading the whole damn world. Yes, I do expect Russia to pack up and leave. They are the wrongful aggressors here invading. I find it appalling that you just expect Ukraine to surrender and be conquered. The NATO alliance, while primarily to thwart the Soviet Union, purpose as a defensive alliance doesn't end nor has that purpose come to an end. To the point, Russia is still a threat and still poses a threat. You sit here trying to argue Russia is such a grave threat we must be concerned about angering them into WWIII and then also argue there is no need for NATO. Why... it is almost like you have a nefarious motive to just support Russia and because NATO opposes the kind of aggression from them you support here, you don't like NATO.

Oh yeah! So, it was about the same exact kind of comment, and I swear these same leftists were losing their minds about that comment, and now they are defending this one.

If it is OK for black people to have pride in their race, it is OK for white people. Also, the whole notion that there is some kind of systemic underlying racism in police killing black people is based on a lie. The data doesn't support that.