User

So again... how do you bring Hamas to justice?

So... you expect that when the left promotes this garbage, no one is supposed to notice and refute the garbage? This is part of the classic leftist spin, where they say or do or promote something outrageous, and then the real issue is that the right noticed.

It was bad enough the judge let them even try to prosecute this, but then after the jurt instructions were provided saying they did not even have to agree on what this other crime was to convict him... it was clearly rigged. This has to get overturned on appeal. They likely know that, but they still get what they wanted though. They get their election interference, they get to claim he was a convicted felon...

Hamas controls Gaza. Hamas would likely control the West Bank if they held elections. So... who is running this state of Palestine you speak of?

LOL, Monkeypox. I forgot about the stupidity of this one. Easily one of the most preventable diseases known to man. Literally. Avoid promiscuous gay anal sex, and especially avoid gay anal sex orgies.

How did he violate NY State Election law? LOL It is just a big circular argument.

It is sad watching you twist and squirm like this. How is it above the law? You quote it. You made the claim, I refuted it with a source.

No, you are literally advocating for just that... when there are other options.

LOL... so, you heard she was not dominant, and where you heard this was on a video clip about her not being on the Olympic team where they never said she was not dominant. Fair enough...

It ws not Perspektiv who said otherwise. It was Perspektiv you told you heard otherwise too... I am asking you, who did you hear otherwise from that she was not dominant? Who is your favorite sports guy who said that? "Yeah because you say she's dominant and I have heard otherwise."

I am asking you to explain your statement. You claimed that you heard otherwise. From who? Are you now saying you agree that she is she's dominant or do you agree with who you heard otherwise from?

Even worse than that, he blew up an innocent family and claimed it was a retaliatory strike on those responsible for blowing up our soldiers... then tried to cover it up when they realized it was an innocent family.

Interesting. You have heard otherwise? Where did you hear that from? Do you believe that and why?

How? This is the most outlandishly naive demand. Hamas committed war crimes when they attacked Israel. So... do you support Israel bringing them to justice now?

Where did he say this? It is a well-known fact Biden talked to his ghostwriter about classified material... "Robert Hur: Biden told ghostwriter he had classified documents, read them out loud" https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2024/mar/12/robert-hur-biden-told-ghostwriter-he-had-classifie/

Yes... after you did, and when I mentioned it, it was to say there were more instances than in Colorado. The issue isn't special privileges, it is that you claimed he would be above the law... how? how would he be above the law?

And... if you read on to page 31... that is where you get the BS: "Although you must conclude unanimously that the defendant conspired to promote or prevent the election of any person to a public office by unlawful means, you need not be unanimous as to what those unlawful means were. In determining whether the defendant conspired to promote or prevent the election of any person to a public office by unlawful means, you may consider the following: (1) violations of the Federal Election Campaign Act otherwise known as FECA; (2) the falsification of other business records; or (3) violation of tax laws." They never outline exactly what it was that he was guilty of, it was a vague "unlawful means" which could have been anything above... All page 30 does is basically say "unlawful means" No one lied to us, but I do wonder if you know what you are doing is dishonest or not.

Then why isn't Russia begging to negotiate on terms that are not so beneficial to them? So.... taking what you say here, you want to leave Russia with all these advantages?

No, There were more instances than the Colorado one, the Democrat AG of Maine removed him from the ballot. Again all cheered on by the left... I did not F up, you are just being dishonest as usual. LOL, you are so dishonest. Now you change "above the law" to "above the current law"

Biden talked to his ghost writer about the classified documents... he did have intent. Duh.

You claimed: "Johnson wants to codify making former POTUS above the law. 🤮" You keep dishonestly trying to change the subject to "seeking special privileges" now. My understanding of your dishonest here is just fine.

Yeah, lets pretend like it was not supported and cheered on by Democrats. Just like you.

Right, so citizens elect their representatives to make decisions like we are talking about here with passing a law to move criminal actions against the President to Federal Courts. So, what is your problem with this? Um... no. The Constitution says no such thing. So, what is your point here? Saying Biden broke the law less than Trump did still means Biden broke the law. Thanks for coming to my Ted Talk.

It was. I wrote quite a bit, even honestly conceding what I have always thought about Trump's stupidity... and this is the best you are willing to do in response? Words have meaning and I earnestly try to use them correctly. Of course you are going to ignore my post... you have been doing that repeatedly throughout this thread when I throw the stupidity of your arguments back in your face. Let me guess, you do in fact question the Gore election, right? Let me guess, you don't actually blame Pelosi or other Democrats like Harris for the violence all summer long around the BLM protests/riots. Right? Let me know when you stop being a two-faced hypocrite on these things.

I guess you couldn't figure out how he was above the law here as you claimed...