User

They were not all Trump's cases nor were they all "lost". Most were never even heard because of standing issues and the vast majority of them were either not heard from standing issues or outright dismissed.

When have temperatures ever not been increasing or decreasing in all of the world's history?

Seriously... why are you even here? You need to use Discord with some like-minded folks with whom you can spend time all day long patting each other on the back for how brilliant everything you say is.

OK, yeah, they ban camping in public spaces. I was thinking about camping at anywhere. Also my brain was not thinking about the city proper... when counties usually have public campgrounds in them. Are you arguing that 100% of homeless people are so because of nothing they chose on their own? Where did I struggle? You have yet to ever even try to back up your assertion here, you just keep avoiding my questions.

Apparently you are the one who is having issues, as that isn't what I had troubles with grasping. Keep on running away.

You did not read my question well, and did not even remember the bounds of your own question to me... Nothing Grants Pass did criminalized someone for one night of having nowhere to sleep and thus by no other choice having to sleep in some public space. They did not ban all camping. What they did was put limits and restrictions on this so that the migrant homeless populations would not turn their city into a permanent homeless encampment. You do realize the vast majority of homeless people are there by choice, addiction, or mental health issues? The people we are talking about are not some down on their luck person who as your silly question frames, just needed a place to sleep and had no other alternatives.

As usual, you make stupid comments and then run away when called out.

What public examples? Again, the incident in question here was behind closed doors, it is the one that Biden is constantly pushing. Yes, he does attack people, but he has no such pattern of generally attacking veterans or service members. He does have a pattern of being nice to them, saying good things about them, and honoring them. You choose to ignore the 99% of his day to day life and act like this contested example is all the proof you need. I am the one being honest here about the facts.

You: The sky is yellow! Me: No it isn't. You: We both made assertions! *facepalm* And... how does this treat impoverished people as criminal deviants? Not all impoverished people are homeless nor do they try to live in public spaces or exceed camping limits in recreational areas... What do you mean if its true? Are you so obtuse here that you are going to deny the obvious? Can you show me where in America a homeless person has no other alternatives other than to be a criminal on night one of being on the streets?

Of course, it is a one-off and an aberration. Trump is a circus clown who attacks people. That doesn't mean he is attacking all POW's. You are still here hung up on the same two examples. That is all you got. It is almost entirely behind closed doors things Trump is accused of saying or doing that can never be vetted as truthful or not. You want to believe what you want to believe. You sit here asking why I don't listen to these people when you also don't listen to most people who don't confirm what you want to hear.

Try to actually answer the question. That would be a good place to start.

LOL, still obfuscating to avoid the stupidity of your comment. Not that you have demonstrated so far.

No, Zionists did not steal Palestine. Do we really need to review how world wars toppled the Ottoman Empire that left British in control and the history leading up to the eventual creation of Israel? That left the Palestinians their own land... Millions of Arabs live in Israel and function as citizens with equal rights. What is this "serious discrimination" you speak of?

You made an assertion, I rejected your assertion. It is your job to prove your assertion, not mine to defend my rejection of it. You also said criminalize their poverty, when what this criminalizes is someone living in public areas for a certain amount of time or other areas for any time at all. Are all public areas 100% off limits all the time to someone sleeping there? No. Can you show me where in America a homeless person has no other alternatives other than to be a criminal on night one of being on the streets?

You were the one who made this stupid distinction. You tell me what the context was you were using here and what makes someone an "African-American" vs Black. The only thing I didn't understand here was your stupid mention of some distinction between the terms African American and Black and how Black History month mainly refers to African Americans.

No, you said: "Blaming people for being poor and criminalized their poverty" I said: "No one is blaming the poor or criminalizing their poverty by enacting laws regarding how long people can "camp" on public property or otherwise sleep/live on public property." I simply refuse to play these dishonest games where folks like you make these assertions and then instead of defending them try to distract with questions that don't follow and then refuse to explain how the question would support their assertion.

Maybe it is a joke, mabye not. Me pointing out facts here doesn't make me naive or an ID10T. It makes you an extreme partisan who is a hypocrite and a liar. "they... LET YOU" Try to get some ability to comprehend words.

Except, it is not. This is the only example you got and the one Biden and team have to repeat over and over again. BS what? He was insulting McCain, not all POW's. Years later? Yeah right. And to the point of integrity, if he felt like he did, he should have said something then. What exactly is it that I am twisting myself into pretzels about here? My position is quite simple and factual. You are the one who is trying to contort an alleged bad comment said that most people deny him saying into something more than it is. Why don't you believe the majority of his closest confidants who reject this allegation? I deal in facts. You, not so much. What is this "disdain for service, service members you speak of? So far you have him insulting McCain and an allegation he said something that most people say he didn't.

Way to avoid the question. I asked: "OMG. Lets hear this brilliant distinction explained. What makes someone an "African-American" vs "Black" and how does "Black" History month mainly refer to "African-Americans?" Let me spell it out for you: Yet again you assert something incredibly dumb, and now you run away instead of owning up to it.

LOL You are dismissing this affidavit before any investigation because it is 3.5 years old. Trump did not brag about doing anything to her on tape.

And of course, you thought the same thing with E Jean Carroll coming out some 20 years later?

There is nothing rational or practical with your absurd claim that invading Ukraine was a matter of survival for Russia. It is Ukraine fighting for their survival right now.

How will it test that?

OMG. Lets hear this brilliant distinction explained. What makes someone an "African-American" vs "Black" and how does "Black" History month mainly refer to "African-Americans?" You can't make this garbage up it is so dumb.

Me: "He is not dismissing them, he is rightly trying to point out the insignificance of them... making the point that the cost to them in manpower is quite significant. You can look at a map for the past 2 years and see that the front lines have been relatively stagnant with tiny gains on each side back and forth. " You: Yeah, but every inch matters to the Ukrainians! (paraphrase) Seriously, you are just being obtuse now. ROFL, yes, in a thread filled with Putin sycophants and cheerleaders for Russia... we dare mention that there is a cost to Russian forces... and to you as well, since YOU are seemingly ignoring them too. I am not talking with a Russian general.. am I? I am not privy to the inner discussions of Russian generals and Putin, but I am certainly not under the belief that none of them care to mention or care about battlefield losses at all, as you are characterizing here. This is not WWII in the Seige of Leningrad. You tried to claim there were not any changes nor any changes in leadership, 2 pages after you claimed changes in leadership. Yes, Putin has repeatedly shaken up the command as they have repeatedly failed to deliver. Not very long at all... so good thing NATO has been continuing to step up in continued support.