User

No, but you sending me a DM saying you are ignoring me because I repeatedly call you out for lying in thread after thread is lashing out though. Speaking of being a SNOWFLAKE...

That isn't how it played out though, from what she claimed in the article. Again, it is like you didn't even read the article.

Only one is explicitly called out in the Constitution. Abortion is not. Rights often conflict, and there is a clear hierarchy of them. In regards to life vs control of body... life wins.

You continue to avoid the point, I presume because you realize how your position is obliterated by it. Here you go one more time: The issue with Biden was not merely that he was old. It was that he was barely sentient. The man can barely walk and is clearly incapable of going a full day at full mental capacity. They have terms for stuff like this, like sundowning. Trump is old, but he is not suffering those same kind of afflictions that Biden clearly was.

It is simply a fact. It is a rights issue, a right-to-life issue for the babies being killed.

Imagine not understanding (or caring) as to how this would be offensive.

Abortion is not a "civil human right" outlined in our Constitution. How so? I imagine almost everything in the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is already part of Canadian law if not more so, certainly the key components.

Now? He always could have been. You and others are not actually criticizing anything specific, you are just making general comments about age or others are nit picking things out of some desperate attempt to try to show Trump to be as bad as Biden.

Of course there was a dispute that occurred, she explained that... wait for it, in the article you claim to have read. Most people are not video recording at the moment, so it is not a matter of conveniently leaving it out of her video—she was not videotaping what would have been a normal boarding experience.

Trump people made Bidens mental health the main issue. Again, both are old, but only one was barely sentient. Trump doesn't need to be protected from the Press by someone dressed up like the Easter Bunny. Trump doesn't need the Secret Service to stand in his way and point to him how to find the door to his own home...

How so?

Your question: " Like when in the boarding process does anyone have a natural opportunity to refer to a flight attendant's gender?" was clearly explained in the article you now claim to have read... "The mother-of-one claims a United employee who identified as a female became visibly shaken when Longoria - who was distracted by her son having a meltdown - said 'thank you, sir,' as the employee handed her back her boarding passes." Your timing on the video is not what was said in the article either. She made the video before they agreed to get her another flight. Wait... do you not think it is a big social trend right now with pronouns and gender identity?

Her latest speech in Houston was one big lie after another. You are such an extreme partisan on this you have no care in the world for being honest about this. You don't care about lies at all. You just care about hating Trump. Never mind, her biggest lie was covering up Biden's mental health issues.

Its like you didn't even read the article.

Why do you only care about Republicans lying and ignore Kamala's lies? Her campaigns lies? Lies from her supporters and the left? Kamala is not the nominee yet. When she is, let's see what Trump will agree to or not agree to. That is what he said.

Elaborate.

Can you point to one time on the forum where you commented on Biden's age? You joined with enough time before he quit to have said something. Did you? None of these others caring about Trump's age now were making that kind of argument about Biden. Even then, it is entirely disingenuous. There is concern about someone being too old, and then there is Biden Barley being sentient to function old.

I hope you are not expecting any rational response. I tried already. He has none.

It had nothing to do with the Olympics other than their handing the opening ceremonies production over to a bunch of LGBTQ cultists. And to the point, if it were Christians put in charge who made some kind of play on the LGBTQ community, it would be outrage beyond outrage and I bet you would be in here on it too.

They made no such admissions.

It is not reasonable to expect anyone to waste their time watching a 47 minute video because someone posted it in an forum like this... If you or the original poster have a few points or something you want to highlight from the video for us to review, go for it.

No such evidence exists.

So, your idea of protecting constitutional rights threatening the constitutional right of free speech? I have a feeling you are just fine with Democrats threatening constitutional rights when it comes to gun control.

Hey, go yell into the wind. Clearly Nazism is in fact a thing. You might as well sit here arguing there is no grass. That was not the point being made. The discussion here was about nationalism until you know who drug up Nazism.

And? That does not make all nationalism Nazism.