User

No, just pointing out that this is all pure partisan politics at its worst.

There is no corruption as the status quo.

That the issues they are concerned with have been fixed, so there is no need. It is hyperbole. You are the one who has to read into the things that were not said to draw the absurd fear-mongering conclusions you are making. How exactly is it that Trump would quite literally ensure they would never have to vote again as you are implying he would somehow be ruler for life? How? That makes no sense.

This is beyond disingenuous. The argument is that the unborn child is a human life, and thus the commandment to not kill applies to them as anyone else... These verses were provided to show the Biblical case for the unborn child being recognized as a human life.

Otherwise he preached love... Seriously, are you even a Christian? Yes or No? You are clearly unaware of what Jesus was spending his time doing with his disciples and what he commanded they go do as well. Where am I using his words to denigrate others? Where? Lets see it.

Not interested in your bigotry. What do you base this on? The creators have not clearly said this. The appearance was taken to be exactly that by a lot of people too. But sure, Hodad is here to tell us we can't all believe our own lying eyes!

This is a question, not evidence to back up your absurd claim. Are you not familiar with the public reporting on what Clarence Thomas has said here regarding this?

Talk about a half-truth. He was nominated to be a prosecutor by Trump in general, then held over by Biden and appointed to the special prosecution by Merrick Garland. What is your point? This doesn't change the facts for how Hunter Biden was allowed to escape tax charges and was almost given a sweetheart plea deal. All under Biden and Biden's DOJ and Biden's AG.

Yet again, you clearly didn't read the article. "Footage shared by Longoria shows the moment United operations manager Gabriella Chidom informs her that she will not be able to get on the flight over 'what came out of her mouth.'"

To be a follower of Christ you must first believe in Christ... do you? Love != acceptance It is the same reason why you reprimand your children when they do something stupid or dangerous. You still love them even though you correct them. Jesus did this daily with his disciples. Yet, you would have us believe that we can't criticize mockery? Give me a break. Jesus was not some hippie from the 70's smoking pot going around holding up the peace sign saying "come on bro, love man, just love"

Jesus was asked this question and he was close, he was getting at what Jesus said here when asked, and this was what he said the greatest commandment was: "You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind." The next was to love your neighbor as you love yourself.

No, it isn't. The single most defining characteristic of being a Christian is being a follower of Christ. It is what the name means: CHRISTian. And by being a follower, that means you accept Christ as the son of God, who died for our sins. Love is part of what a Christian does, not what makes someone a Christian. Who is using Christs teachings to attack them? We are pointing out that they are being insulting with their mockery. That is a true observation regardless of Christs teachings.

Yes, his administration certainly did as did the DOJ in general. They drug their feet on the tax charges and hit the statute of limitations and then they tried to plead him out on a sweetheart deal that if a Judge had not reviewed and questioned the absurdity of it, there would never have been a prosecution at all.

You were the one making up the obviously absurdly false on its face claim that: "two justices are bought and paid for by billionaires (and tried to hide it)" And that they admitted to this... They never admitted to being "bought and paid for" nor is there evidence of that. Yes, Clarence Thomas went on vacations with his rich friend... but there is zero evidence that "bought" him.

She provided some video to back up her story and the response from United, as was pointed out by not just her but the author of the article certainly did not seem to add up either. The question is not if United would ban someone for life, but if that is something that the employees threatened. Certainly plausible and yes, the airlines have banned people for far less. How quickly you guys forget the mask mandate madness where families were getting booted because their young child had issues with keeping a mask on. Again... if you guys actually read the article or watched the video, the issue was clearly about more than having too much baggage.

Except, you characterized the events not as she claimed... I am keeping up just fine. Perhaps if you actually read the article you could too.

I didn't enjoy the show. I don't enjoy watching the cult of LGBTQ do things to denigrate my faith (never mind the disgusting nature of a naked dude on a platter or the idiocy of trying to say it was for the Greek God Dionysus making us aware of the absurdity of violence when they are ignorant of the cult of Dionysus that engaged in violent frenzied actions...) during what is supposed to be a worldwide event where athletes come together to compete as sportsman in fair competition against each other. What next? Are you going to call a black man a Ni$$er and then tell him it is his choice to be offended or not? LOL

People? What people? You tried to play this off as if it were anonymous people on social media. After you were called out, now you have pivoted to trying to criticize those people. That doesn't mean things are not offensive.

OK, what makes someone a Christian? It isn't love. Anyone can love others. Jesus preached on a great deal of things and love doesn't mean acceptance of deviant behavior.

Huh? Do you even know what makes someone a Christian? It doesn't seem like it.

That still isn't the subject. Just amazing...

Well, now you are just trying to change the subject. You tried to play this off like no one except anonymous people on social media cared. You were wrong. Own that.

Most major media outlets (if not all) have reported on this, and many prominent non-anonymous people, from Harris Butker to the Speaker of the House, have said something.

No, but you sending me a DM saying you are ignoring me because I repeatedly call you out for lying in thread after thread is lashing out though. Speaking of being a SNOWFLAKE...

That isn't how it played out though, from what she claimed in the article. Again, it is like you didn't even read the article.