User

Try to keep up with the discussion before jumping in. Apparently Rebound gave a big enough crap to try to say this was a lie. I suppose you are not really interested in the facts now that they show Rebound was wrong and that Tampon Tim did in fact support putting them in the boys restrooms. And we are talking about public policy being enacted by a public figure with tax dollars. This is my business. If you want to carry around tampons for yourself, go for it. Not my business. Show me where they were paid for that. They were both CSM's, how were either of them passed over for promotion? You can't deal with the facts, all you can do is try to make up crap to attack those presenting them.

No, you used pain to differentiate between a born child and an unborn one. Once I took pain off the table, your argument fell apart. Which, to the point, you have continued to ignore my repeated questions about killing a 5 year old and the morality opinion argument you were playing at. I don't need data to show the logical inconsistencies in your arguments. I just need to show you the better argument, and I did. Not me... and no, you were using that pain argument as part of the difference... "The difference is their ability to feel pain..." As I have logically reduced you to admitting now, pain had nothing to do with it. So, honestly, when your wife was pregnant with your daughter, did you think she was just a mere clump of cells and not a human life until viability and had a stranger beat your wife before then causing your daughter to have "died" in the womb (stopped developing) I am sure you and your wife would have been just fine with that because hey, not a human life yet. No feelings at all... right? For the millionth time, we are talking about the right to life for that unborn child as well... And the sexism card is just dumb, the pro-life movement is diverse and comprised of women as well. And for the millionth time, the unborn child is not a woman's body. And for the millionth time, even your own arguments do not respect a woman's body, you still think that unborn child is a human life after viability, no?

The fact that you are trying to hard to dodge this question only proves you know you are wrong.

He was conditionally promoted to the rank, not to the benefits package. You literally have no idea what you are talking about or are just being obtuse to avoid owning up to the facts here. He never owned that rank. IT. WAS. CONDITIONAL. He did not meet the conditions. I guess this is better than your usual "crying" schtick, but not that much.

Well, it was not a lie to say Obama never released his long form Birth Certificate and thanks to Trump's bringing it up, that put pressure on Obama and he finally did. If anything, we can say Trump helped put this story out of its misery and killed it.

Yet, you focused the argument on one of pain... as a reason to say it was wrong to kill a born person or child while arguing it is just fine to kill the unborn because they feel no pain. So... now after I have logically reduced your argument... the whole pain thing was a ruse and you are moving goal posts now to "not born" or "not past a certain state of development" Only if they try to kill their unborn child... most will not. The vast majority will not. You tried to act reasonably earlier, and I tried to play along, but now you resort to this petty language about being glad you live somewhere where my line of thinking isn't considered...

It is amazing how you just keep moving these goal posts here... Also, mental health still applies while that baby is lying on the floor. So, still a healthcare decision of the mother, no? But forcing a mother to raise and care for a child she doesn't want... isn't immoral? I did not ask you about when a soul exists. I asked you when you believe human life begins. I mean, clearly you think that must happen at least at birth, no? Is a 1 second old child that has just emerged from the birth canal a human life? This is some real Sea Lioning if I have ever seen it before... yeah, there are 1 million abortions a year in America, there are not 1 Million murders a year. There are about 100K abortions a year in Canada. About 1,000 murders. Do you really need a source? Do you really believe there are more murders than abortions? Really? I don't know the Canada stats, but in America 95%+ of abortions are for the mere convenience of it. <5% are due to Rape, incest, or the life of the mother. I don't like to use the term murder when talking about abortions, when it comes to the life of the mother, you have two conflicting right to life issues at hand, one must trump the other.

A newborn baby is dependent on the mother to live. If you leave it lying on the ground, it will die without support. I asked you what you think. Murder is more rare. Should we make murder legal?

You are either ignorant of these things or you are a liar. Which is it? The law was passed saying the menstrual products must be placed in bathrooms where they are used by students. It was specifically vague of gender to include transgender "boys" in the boys bathroom. Republicans tried to change this language, Democrats opposed. The bill was quite specifically written in such a way as to include ALL bathrooms, not just girls bathrooms. According to other Command Sergeant's Majors in an open letter back in 2018, they laid out the timing of Walz retirement to show he did in fact leave because he found out they were deploying to Iraq. Think about it... he accepted a conditional promotion to CSM... just to turn around and immediately retire right after? After finding out they would deploy to Iraq? You want to make this a game about how long people served... well, hear it from those who did:

That is not Democrats, that was the DOJ under Trump. And guess what Democrats were doing after those arrests? They were crying and complaining about them. Do you forget what the then Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi said? She called the federal officers kidnappers.

So... you think that is cool for 5 year olds too? What do you use as the basis then?

Are you confessing? This is exactly what you do here.

Yes, yes he has. Biden forced Israel to slow walk their invasion of Rafah and throughout the invasion has continually demanded Israel slow down or otherwise stop knowing full well their mission was to eliminate Hamas. Biden used weapons as leverage against them. Biden has made this war drag on. No other country in the Middle East wants anything to do with the Palestinians like that. We fire bombed and then atomic bombed the Japanese into submission. You want to green light doing the same to Gaza?

It was "conditional" and he failed to meet the conditions. I don't need to cope and seethe, you do.

Except, he didn't retire as a Sgt Maj. His retirement checks are only at the pay grade of E-8. He was given a conditional promotion that he failed to live up to the conditions of. He knows that. Saying you retired as a Sgt Maj is disingenuous at best, hyping up yourself, and almost certainly just being dishonest trying to pump yourself up to being something you didn't officially earn. I am still verifying the paperwork, but the reports I have read show he was conditionally promoted in April 2005 and retried May 2005. He was in the Guard... so, he may have only been a Sgt Maj "conditionally" for one weekend. So, bragging about that after the fact... come on.

This is your bogus response NOW, only after we can throw this in your face about a candidate you are supporting. Last year you were on here bringing up Trump when it was convenient for you then... "Except competitive tennis is way longer than twenty minutes, very hard on the feet, and, of course, Trump didn’t have bone spurs at all."

Maybe just stop telling girls they have to compete against males, just because those males want to be girls... and stop telling us we have to go along with the fantasy. Not that you will respond, because you are cowardly hiding from me.

We are not talking about some oddball hypothetical trolly question. We are talking very specifically about killing 1 unborn child vs killing any other 1 person or 5 year old.

That is a bit of a fallacious question. You might as well ask what logic determines killing a 5 year old is unethical. The logic is regarding the unborn child being a human life. Whether or not you think killing anyone is ethical or not is a different argument.

That is not what Trump said at all. The point Trump was making was that if the other NATO countries can't fairly contribute to their own defense, why should we? Trump has consistently pushed for NATO countries to contribute more to their defense so it is not just America footing most of the bill. They are dying because Biden has pushed Israel to make this war drag on longer and longer while Biden also has encouraged Hamas to continue fighting while Biden puts most of the pressure on Israel instead of Hamas.

This is not the definition of bribery. Almost universally, everyone in politics does this, in that they give special access to donors and consider what they are lobbying for. Bribery is doing something ILLEGAL for $$$. When parents offer $$$ to their kids to go pick up the dog poop in the backyard, that is not a bribe; it is an allowance.

Are you talking about the cult of Democrats in how they cheer on the merciless prosecution of anyone there on J6 while ignoring left wing violent protestors?

Saying that Harris is too stupid to be respected by Putin in any kind of negotiations is not being a "thug lover" for crying out loud.

No, what is lazy is that you are ignoring my challenges to this point I already made to you. I asked you this question to get at the morality being discussed here, did you ever answer? No. You are trying to get out of answering it now by saying killing a one year old is different because of pain. So... you are just fine with a mother killing her 1 year old for the convenience of it as long as it is painless?

Again... the unborn child certainly is not a turtle. It is a human. Human egg combined with human sperm, resulting in unique human DNA. The Pro-Life movement is diverse. It is not solely comprised of religious people and the general religious principles by which they say killing unborn children is wrong is the same for why they think killing 5 year olds is wrong. The logic, science, and reasoning applied to why the unborn child is a human life is not religious based.